Mattia Gianassi , Leonardo Leoni , Italo Cesidio Fantozzi , Filippo De Carlo , Mario Tucci
{"title":"混合模型和多模型装配线:资源管理的系统文献综述","authors":"Mattia Gianassi , Leonardo Leoni , Italo Cesidio Fantozzi , Filippo De Carlo , Mario Tucci","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 632-657"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines: A systematic literature review on resource management\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Gianassi , Leonardo Leoni , Italo Cesidio Fantozzi , Filippo De Carlo , Mario Tucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Systems\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 632-657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612525001797\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612525001797","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines: A systematic literature review on resource management
In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Manufacturing Systems is dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge fundamental and applied research in manufacturing at the systems level. Encompassing products, equipment, people, information, control, and support functions, manufacturing systems play a pivotal role in the economical and competitive development, production, delivery, and total lifecycle of products, meeting market and societal needs.
With a commitment to publishing archival scholarly literature, the journal strives to advance the state of the art in manufacturing systems and foster innovation in crafting efficient, robust, and sustainable manufacturing systems. The focus extends from equipment-level considerations to the broader scope of the extended enterprise. The Journal welcomes research addressing challenges across various scales, including nano, micro, and macro-scale manufacturing, and spanning diverse sectors such as aerospace, automotive, energy, and medical device manufacturing.