混合模型和多模型装配线:资源管理的系统文献综述

IF 14.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Mattia Gianassi , Leonardo Leoni , Italo Cesidio Fantozzi , Filippo De Carlo , Mario Tucci
{"title":"混合模型和多模型装配线:资源管理的系统文献综述","authors":"Mattia Gianassi ,&nbsp;Leonardo Leoni ,&nbsp;Italo Cesidio Fantozzi ,&nbsp;Filippo De Carlo ,&nbsp;Mario Tucci","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 632-657"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines: A systematic literature review on resource management\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Gianassi ,&nbsp;Leonardo Leoni ,&nbsp;Italo Cesidio Fantozzi ,&nbsp;Filippo De Carlo ,&nbsp;Mario Tucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Systems\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 632-657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612525001797\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612525001797","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代动态制造环境中,产品个性化和生产线定制化可能是竞争力的关键来源,这使得混合模型和多模型装配线不可或缺。内部和外部因素造成的变化以及资源的灵活性在这些情况下起着关键作用。尽管如此,关于在这种环境中如何考虑资源的系统分析仍然有限,特别是关于不同资源类型之间的可变性和相互作用的分析。因此,本文进行了系统的文献综述,分析了63项关于混合模型装配线(mmalp)和多模型装配线(MuMALPs)的研究。该评估调查了资源特征,如空间、操作人员技能、成本或设备可用性,以及是否以及如何解决操作时间或市场需求的变化。审查显示,成本和可得性是最常审查的资源特征,而空间的开发则相对较少。线条设计和线条平衡是主要目标,通常通过整数规划或元启发式来解决,而机器学习——尽管总体上不太常见——更常用于高可变性条件下。这些结果为研究人员和从业者提供了实用的见解,突出了这些发现所揭示的当前差距,并提出了根据所获得的结果进行探索的特别有价值的途径,从而强调了对柔性和可重构线进行更深入研究的必要性,以及在mmalp和MuMALPs的实际应用中更广泛的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines: A systematic literature review on resource management
In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Journal of Manufacturing Systems 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
23.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
216
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manufacturing Systems is dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge fundamental and applied research in manufacturing at the systems level. Encompassing products, equipment, people, information, control, and support functions, manufacturing systems play a pivotal role in the economical and competitive development, production, delivery, and total lifecycle of products, meeting market and societal needs. With a commitment to publishing archival scholarly literature, the journal strives to advance the state of the art in manufacturing systems and foster innovation in crafting efficient, robust, and sustainable manufacturing systems. The focus extends from equipment-level considerations to the broader scope of the extended enterprise. The Journal welcomes research addressing challenges across various scales, including nano, micro, and macro-scale manufacturing, and spanning diverse sectors such as aerospace, automotive, energy, and medical device manufacturing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信