学者参与社会的微观基础

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Vitus Püttmann , Stephan L. Thomsen
{"title":"学者参与社会的微观基础","authors":"Vitus Püttmann ,&nbsp;Stephan L. Thomsen","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing societal challenges such as climate change and social inequality requires the knowledge generated by academics as well as their direct engagement with society, which supports the translation of knowledge into solutions. Understanding what drives academics' engagement is thus crucial for efforts to foster their impact on societal development. To obtain in-depth insights into these drivers, this study develops a differentiated perspective that considers academics' value orientations and engagement motives and accounts for differences between engagement forms. From this perspective, we develop hypotheses in response to three research questions: First, which differences are there between academics as regards their value orientations? Second, how are these value orientations linked to academics' motives? Third, are these differences reflected in academics' actual engagement? We test the hypotheses empirically using the outcomes of a census survey of professors at German higher education institutions governed by the state or religious institutions, which yielded 4249 responses. Our empirical analysis (using Stata 17) identifies four types of value orientations, characterized by differences in the boundaries that academics draw between science and other societal sectors and in the importance they assign to societal engagement as part of their duties. The types are also systematically linked to academics' intrinsic and extrinsic motives to engage. Both value orientations and motives are furthermore reflected in academics' actual engagement. Our findings thus highlight that understanding and fostering academics' societal roles requires consideration of the diverse forms of academics’ engagement and the specific motivations underlying it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 103314"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The microfoundations of academics’ engagement with society\",\"authors\":\"Vitus Püttmann ,&nbsp;Stephan L. Thomsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Addressing societal challenges such as climate change and social inequality requires the knowledge generated by academics as well as their direct engagement with society, which supports the translation of knowledge into solutions. Understanding what drives academics' engagement is thus crucial for efforts to foster their impact on societal development. To obtain in-depth insights into these drivers, this study develops a differentiated perspective that considers academics' value orientations and engagement motives and accounts for differences between engagement forms. From this perspective, we develop hypotheses in response to three research questions: First, which differences are there between academics as regards their value orientations? Second, how are these value orientations linked to academics' motives? Third, are these differences reflected in academics' actual engagement? We test the hypotheses empirically using the outcomes of a census survey of professors at German higher education institutions governed by the state or religious institutions, which yielded 4249 responses. Our empirical analysis (using Stata 17) identifies four types of value orientations, characterized by differences in the boundaries that academics draw between science and other societal sectors and in the importance they assign to societal engagement as part of their duties. The types are also systematically linked to academics' intrinsic and extrinsic motives to engage. Both value orientations and motives are furthermore reflected in academics' actual engagement. Our findings thus highlight that understanding and fostering academics' societal roles requires consideration of the diverse forms of academics’ engagement and the specific motivations underlying it.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225001464\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225001464","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应对气候变化和社会不平等等社会挑战需要学术界产生的知识以及他们与社会的直接接触,这支持将知识转化为解决方案。因此,了解是什么推动了学者的参与,对于促进他们对社会发展的影响至关重要。为了深入了解这些驱动因素,本研究发展了一个差异化的视角,考虑了学者的价值取向和参与动机,并解释了参与形式之间的差异。从这个角度出发,我们针对三个研究问题提出了假设:第一,学者之间在价值取向上存在哪些差异?第二,这些价值取向是如何与学者的动机联系起来的?第三,这些差异是否反映在学者的实际参与中?我们对由国家或宗教机构管理的德国高等教育机构的教授进行了一次人口普查调查,得到了4249份回复,并利用调查结果对这些假设进行了实证检验。我们的实证分析(使用Stata 17)确定了四种类型的价值取向,其特点是学术界在科学和其他社会部门之间划分的边界不同,以及他们将社会参与作为其职责的一部分赋予的重要性不同。这些类型也与学者参与的内在和外在动机系统地联系在一起。价值取向和动机都进一步体现在学者的实际参与中。因此,我们的研究结果强调,理解和培养学者的社会角色需要考虑学者参与的各种形式及其背后的具体动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The microfoundations of academics’ engagement with society
Addressing societal challenges such as climate change and social inequality requires the knowledge generated by academics as well as their direct engagement with society, which supports the translation of knowledge into solutions. Understanding what drives academics' engagement is thus crucial for efforts to foster their impact on societal development. To obtain in-depth insights into these drivers, this study develops a differentiated perspective that considers academics' value orientations and engagement motives and accounts for differences between engagement forms. From this perspective, we develop hypotheses in response to three research questions: First, which differences are there between academics as regards their value orientations? Second, how are these value orientations linked to academics' motives? Third, are these differences reflected in academics' actual engagement? We test the hypotheses empirically using the outcomes of a census survey of professors at German higher education institutions governed by the state or religious institutions, which yielded 4249 responses. Our empirical analysis (using Stata 17) identifies four types of value orientations, characterized by differences in the boundaries that academics draw between science and other societal sectors and in the importance they assign to societal engagement as part of their duties. The types are also systematically linked to academics' intrinsic and extrinsic motives to engage. Both value orientations and motives are furthermore reflected in academics' actual engagement. Our findings thus highlight that understanding and fostering academics' societal roles requires consideration of the diverse forms of academics’ engagement and the specific motivations underlying it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信