{"title":"全球变暖会影响生态盈余吗?","authors":"Tie-Ying Liu, Zhi-Yi Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper discusses the influence of global warming on the ecological surplus in 122 countries from 1992 to 2020 from a global perspective using a two-stage least squares approach. The robust results show that global warming has reduced the ecological surplus through an improvement in carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP and reductions in resource rents and forestland. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that the ecological surplus decreases with global warming in low-latitude countries and is unaffected by global warming in middle- and high-latitude countries. In addition, global warming positively affects the ecological surplus of developed countries but negatively affects that of developing countries. Global warming also has an adverse impact on the ecological surplus in energy-intensive countries but not on that in low-energy-intensity countries. Additionally, global warming reduces the ecological surplus for African Union (AU) countries but has no effect on European Union (EU) or Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) countries. Also, population aging further reduces the impact of global warming on the ecological surplus. This study provides evidence for maintaining the ecological surplus and ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 127015"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does global warming affect the ecological surplus?\",\"authors\":\"Tie-Ying Liu, Zhi-Yi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper discusses the influence of global warming on the ecological surplus in 122 countries from 1992 to 2020 from a global perspective using a two-stage least squares approach. The robust results show that global warming has reduced the ecological surplus through an improvement in carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP and reductions in resource rents and forestland. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that the ecological surplus decreases with global warming in low-latitude countries and is unaffected by global warming in middle- and high-latitude countries. In addition, global warming positively affects the ecological surplus of developed countries but negatively affects that of developing countries. Global warming also has an adverse impact on the ecological surplus in energy-intensive countries but not on that in low-energy-intensity countries. Additionally, global warming reduces the ecological surplus for African Union (AU) countries but has no effect on European Union (EU) or Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) countries. Also, population aging further reduces the impact of global warming on the ecological surplus. This study provides evidence for maintaining the ecological surplus and ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713812500192X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713812500192X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does global warming affect the ecological surplus?
This paper discusses the influence of global warming on the ecological surplus in 122 countries from 1992 to 2020 from a global perspective using a two-stage least squares approach. The robust results show that global warming has reduced the ecological surplus through an improvement in carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP and reductions in resource rents and forestland. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that the ecological surplus decreases with global warming in low-latitude countries and is unaffected by global warming in middle- and high-latitude countries. In addition, global warming positively affects the ecological surplus of developed countries but negatively affects that of developing countries. Global warming also has an adverse impact on the ecological surplus in energy-intensive countries but not on that in low-energy-intensity countries. Additionally, global warming reduces the ecological surplus for African Union (AU) countries but has no effect on European Union (EU) or Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) countries. Also, population aging further reduces the impact of global warming on the ecological surplus. This study provides evidence for maintaining the ecological surplus and ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.