数字标准化与适应:减轻外部责任-文献综述

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Keith D. Brouthers , Christine Ascencio , Mamoun Benmamoun , Hadi Alhorr
{"title":"数字标准化与适应:减轻外部责任-文献综述","authors":"Keith D. Brouthers ,&nbsp;Christine Ascencio ,&nbsp;Mamoun Benmamoun ,&nbsp;Hadi Alhorr","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102487"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review\",\"authors\":\"Keith D. Brouthers ,&nbsp;Christine Ascencio ,&nbsp;Mamoun Benmamoun ,&nbsp;Hadi Alhorr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Business Review\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,在国际上扩张的公司必须决定何时通过标准化或调整其产品、价格、促销和分销活动来修改其商业模式,以克服外国责任(LOF)。然而,通过基于互联网的数字企业(如网站、移动应用程序、社交媒体和在线平台)追求国际化的公司会遇到明显的进入壁垒,从而产生外部责任(LOO)。我们通过提出一个概念框架和理论视角来解释商业模式标准化或适应程度如何影响企业在数字国际化中减少LOF和LOO的程度,从而为这一文献做出贡献。然后,我们对现有的数字标准化和适应研究进行了系统的文献综述,强调了当前的发现,并确定了该领域的关键差距。我们对49项相关研究的回顾表明,现有的许多研究都是碎片化的,往往缺乏统一的理论基础,主要关注网站和促销适应,在很大程度上忽视了其他关键的商业模式组成部分和更广泛的数字特定的进入壁垒。根据我们的理论和文献综述,我们提出了指导未来研究的建议,并促进了我们对这一重要问题的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review
Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信