Keith D. Brouthers , Christine Ascencio , Mamoun Benmamoun , Hadi Alhorr
{"title":"数字标准化与适应:减轻外部责任-文献综述","authors":"Keith D. Brouthers , Christine Ascencio , Mamoun Benmamoun , Hadi Alhorr","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102487"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review\",\"authors\":\"Keith D. Brouthers , Christine Ascencio , Mamoun Benmamoun , Hadi Alhorr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Business Review\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review
Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.