细胞外囊泡作为创伤性脑损伤的生物标志物:动物和临床研究的系统综述

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nekane Romero-García, Alberto Ruiz-Pacheco, Javier Huete-Acevedo, Berta Monleón, Antoni Vicente, Cristina Mas-Bargues, Jorge Sanz-Ros, Maria Luisa García-Pérez, Andrea Gutiérrez, Jose Carbonell, Gerardo Aguilar, Fabio Tarantino, Consuelo Borrás, Chiara Robba, Rafael Badenes
{"title":"细胞外囊泡作为创伤性脑损伤的生物标志物:动物和临床研究的系统综述","authors":"Nekane Romero-García, Alberto Ruiz-Pacheco, Javier Huete-Acevedo, Berta Monleón, Antoni Vicente, Cristina Mas-Bargues, Jorge Sanz-Ros, Maria Luisa García-Pérez, Andrea Gutiérrez, Jose Carbonell, Gerardo Aguilar, Fabio Tarantino, Consuelo Borrás, Chiara Robba, Rafael Badenes","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05477-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Clinical or imaging scales are currently used to stratify severity, but they show a limited correlation with clinical prognosis, which has raised interest in biomarkers. Extracellular vesicles (EV)-based biomarkers may be superior to soluble biomarkers because of their stability, resistance to degradation and unique signature according to tissue of origin. Identification of EV-associated TBI biomarkers remains challenging due to the significant heterogeneity in experimental design, exosome isolation methods and study populations. This systematic review aims to analyze the role of EVs as biomarkers in TBI across both animal and clinical models, with particular focus on their association with prognosis. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 31st, 2024, using the terms “traumatic brain injury”, “extracellular vesicles” and “biomarkers”. Animal studies and human cohort, case control, and case series studies were included; previous reviews, congress abstracts, and non-peer-reviewed works were excluded. Studies conducted on adult individuals or in experimental models of acute TBI, regardless of the mechanism and severity, and which studied biomarkers within the first week of injury, were included. The primary outcome was the EV-based biomarker identified by each study and its diagnostic accuracy when provided. Secondary outcomes were sample type for EV isolation, origin of EVs and methods for isolation and characterization. A total of 18 animal and 19 human studies were included. miRNAs were the most frequently identified biomarker in animal studies, while proteins were most common in human studies. The most commonly identified proteins in EVs were GFAP, UCH-L1, and Tau, with miRNA-124-3p also being repeatedly found. EVs were most frequently obtained from plasma, followed by brain tissue lysates in animals and cerebrospinal fluid or saliva in humans. Most studies used ultracentrifugation or polymer-based precipitation for EV isolation, with western blotting and electron microscopy for characterization. Few studies provided a measure of accuracy for the studied biomarkers; the highest diagnostic performance has been achieved with neural EV-based miRNA panels. While several studies explored diagnostic applications, only a limited number investigated prognostic utility, with few using scales such as GOS-E or evaluating long-term neurocognitive complications. This review highlights the potential of EV-based biomarkers in TBI, emphasizing their stability and tissue-specific signatures. Standardized protocols for EV isolation and characterization are needed for consistency across studies. While diagnostic applications have been explored, more research is required on the prognostic value of EV biomarkers, particularly for neurological outcomes, with future studies incorporating performance metrics to assess their clinical relevance. ","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracellular vesicles as a biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of animal and clinical studies\",\"authors\":\"Nekane Romero-García, Alberto Ruiz-Pacheco, Javier Huete-Acevedo, Berta Monleón, Antoni Vicente, Cristina Mas-Bargues, Jorge Sanz-Ros, Maria Luisa García-Pérez, Andrea Gutiérrez, Jose Carbonell, Gerardo Aguilar, Fabio Tarantino, Consuelo Borrás, Chiara Robba, Rafael Badenes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05477-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Clinical or imaging scales are currently used to stratify severity, but they show a limited correlation with clinical prognosis, which has raised interest in biomarkers. Extracellular vesicles (EV)-based biomarkers may be superior to soluble biomarkers because of their stability, resistance to degradation and unique signature according to tissue of origin. Identification of EV-associated TBI biomarkers remains challenging due to the significant heterogeneity in experimental design, exosome isolation methods and study populations. This systematic review aims to analyze the role of EVs as biomarkers in TBI across both animal and clinical models, with particular focus on their association with prognosis. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 31st, 2024, using the terms “traumatic brain injury”, “extracellular vesicles” and “biomarkers”. Animal studies and human cohort, case control, and case series studies were included; previous reviews, congress abstracts, and non-peer-reviewed works were excluded. Studies conducted on adult individuals or in experimental models of acute TBI, regardless of the mechanism and severity, and which studied biomarkers within the first week of injury, were included. The primary outcome was the EV-based biomarker identified by each study and its diagnostic accuracy when provided. Secondary outcomes were sample type for EV isolation, origin of EVs and methods for isolation and characterization. A total of 18 animal and 19 human studies were included. miRNAs were the most frequently identified biomarker in animal studies, while proteins were most common in human studies. The most commonly identified proteins in EVs were GFAP, UCH-L1, and Tau, with miRNA-124-3p also being repeatedly found. EVs were most frequently obtained from plasma, followed by brain tissue lysates in animals and cerebrospinal fluid or saliva in humans. Most studies used ultracentrifugation or polymer-based precipitation for EV isolation, with western blotting and electron microscopy for characterization. Few studies provided a measure of accuracy for the studied biomarkers; the highest diagnostic performance has been achieved with neural EV-based miRNA panels. While several studies explored diagnostic applications, only a limited number investigated prognostic utility, with few using scales such as GOS-E or evaluating long-term neurocognitive complications. This review highlights the potential of EV-based biomarkers in TBI, emphasizing their stability and tissue-specific signatures. Standardized protocols for EV isolation and characterization are needed for consistency across studies. While diagnostic applications have been explored, more research is required on the prognostic value of EV biomarkers, particularly for neurological outcomes, with future studies incorporating performance metrics to assess their clinical relevance. \",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05477-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05477-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是世界范围内致残的主要原因之一。临床或影像学量表目前用于对严重程度进行分层,但它们与临床预后的相关性有限,这引起了人们对生物标志物的兴趣。基于细胞外囊泡(EV)的生物标志物可能优于可溶性生物标志物,因为它们具有稳定性,抗降解性和根据来源组织的独特特征。由于实验设计、外泌体分离方法和研究人群的显著异质性,鉴定ev相关的TBI生物标志物仍然具有挑战性。本系统综述旨在分析ev作为生物标志物在动物和临床模型中TBI中的作用,特别关注它们与预后的关系。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价。从成立到2024年12月31日,使用术语“创伤性脑损伤”、“细胞外囊泡”和“生物标志物”对四个电子数据库进行了检索。包括动物研究和人类队列研究、病例对照和病例系列研究;先前的综述、会议摘要和非同行评议的作品被排除在外。在成人个体或急性TBI实验模型中进行的研究,无论其机制和严重程度如何,都包括在损伤第一周内研究生物标志物的研究。主要结果是每项研究确定的基于ev的生物标志物及其提供时的诊断准确性。次要结果为分离EV的样本类型、EV的来源以及分离和鉴定方法。总共包括18项动物研究和19项人类研究。mirna是动物研究中最常见的生物标志物,而蛋白质在人类研究中最常见。EVs中最常见的蛋白是GFAP、UCH-L1和Tau, miRNA-124-3p也被反复发现。EVs最常从血浆中获得,其次是动物的脑组织裂解液和人类的脑脊液或唾液。大多数研究使用超离心或聚合物沉淀法分离EV,并用western blotting和电子显微镜进行表征。很少有研究为所研究的生物标志物提供准确性的测量;基于神经ev的miRNA面板具有最高的诊断性能。虽然有几项研究探索了诊断应用,但只有有限数量的研究调查了预后效用,很少使用GOS-E量表或评估长期神经认知并发症。这篇综述强调了基于ev的生物标志物在TBI中的潜力,强调了它们的稳定性和组织特异性特征。为了在研究中保持一致性,需要标准化的EV分离和表征方案。虽然已经探索了诊断应用,但还需要对EV生物标志物的预后价值进行更多的研究,特别是对神经预后的预测,未来的研究将纳入性能指标来评估其临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracellular vesicles as a biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of animal and clinical studies
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Clinical or imaging scales are currently used to stratify severity, but they show a limited correlation with clinical prognosis, which has raised interest in biomarkers. Extracellular vesicles (EV)-based biomarkers may be superior to soluble biomarkers because of their stability, resistance to degradation and unique signature according to tissue of origin. Identification of EV-associated TBI biomarkers remains challenging due to the significant heterogeneity in experimental design, exosome isolation methods and study populations. This systematic review aims to analyze the role of EVs as biomarkers in TBI across both animal and clinical models, with particular focus on their association with prognosis. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 31st, 2024, using the terms “traumatic brain injury”, “extracellular vesicles” and “biomarkers”. Animal studies and human cohort, case control, and case series studies were included; previous reviews, congress abstracts, and non-peer-reviewed works were excluded. Studies conducted on adult individuals or in experimental models of acute TBI, regardless of the mechanism and severity, and which studied biomarkers within the first week of injury, were included. The primary outcome was the EV-based biomarker identified by each study and its diagnostic accuracy when provided. Secondary outcomes were sample type for EV isolation, origin of EVs and methods for isolation and characterization. A total of 18 animal and 19 human studies were included. miRNAs were the most frequently identified biomarker in animal studies, while proteins were most common in human studies. The most commonly identified proteins in EVs were GFAP, UCH-L1, and Tau, with miRNA-124-3p also being repeatedly found. EVs were most frequently obtained from plasma, followed by brain tissue lysates in animals and cerebrospinal fluid or saliva in humans. Most studies used ultracentrifugation or polymer-based precipitation for EV isolation, with western blotting and electron microscopy for characterization. Few studies provided a measure of accuracy for the studied biomarkers; the highest diagnostic performance has been achieved with neural EV-based miRNA panels. While several studies explored diagnostic applications, only a limited number investigated prognostic utility, with few using scales such as GOS-E or evaluating long-term neurocognitive complications. This review highlights the potential of EV-based biomarkers in TBI, emphasizing their stability and tissue-specific signatures. Standardized protocols for EV isolation and characterization are needed for consistency across studies. While diagnostic applications have been explored, more research is required on the prognostic value of EV biomarkers, particularly for neurological outcomes, with future studies incorporating performance metrics to assess their clinical relevance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信