全身性药物治疗和痴呆风险:一个系统的总括性回顾

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Clara Belessiotis-Richards, Joseph Hayes, Ying Feng Yap, Shivangi Talwar, Michelle Eskinazi, Wenqianglong Li, Harry Ward, Pilar A. Letrondo, Madeleine Morelli-Batters, Andrea Bruun, Rongyu Lin, Talen Wright, Naaheed Mukadam
{"title":"全身性药物治疗和痴呆风险:一个系统的总括性回顾","authors":"Clara Belessiotis-Richards, Joseph Hayes, Ying Feng Yap, Shivangi Talwar, Michelle Eskinazi, Wenqianglong Li, Harry Ward, Pilar A. Letrondo, Madeleine Morelli-Batters, Andrea Bruun, Rongyu Lin, Talen Wright, Naaheed Mukadam","doi":"10.1038/s41380-025-03129-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Previous meta-analyses have found that systemic medications may modulate dementia risk. We aimed to provide an overview of this evidence to guide clinical practice and future research.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses (PROSPERO CRD42021226307), searching databases from inception to 15th April 2024. Only peer-reviewed meta-analyses examining dementia risk and systemic medications in humans were included. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted study data and assessed quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Three authors independently rated the certainty of evidence for each drug using the GRADE framework.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>68 meta-analyses were included, across 11 drug categories. Across meta-analyses, available data were primarily observational. Confounding by indication and potential reverse causality were important limitations. Randomised-controlled data were rare but supported an association between treatment of hypertension and reduced dementia incidence. Overall, we found moderate certainty evidence of reduced risk of dementia associated with anti-hypertensives, statins, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and moderate certainty of increased risk with anticholinergics.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Discussion</h3><p>Currently, there is insufficient evidence to advise repurposing any systemic drugs with the primary aim of reducing dementia risk. On the basis of our findings, we recommend proactive treatment of hypertension to reduce risk of all-cause dementia. Our findings did not find a difference between antihypertensive drug classes, but dementia risk was associated with blood pressure reading. In addition, we advise avoidance of anticholinergic drugs in cognitive impairment, with assessment of anticholinergic burden and consideration of alternatives during routine clinical contacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic medications and dementia risk: a systematic umbrella review\",\"authors\":\"Clara Belessiotis-Richards, Joseph Hayes, Ying Feng Yap, Shivangi Talwar, Michelle Eskinazi, Wenqianglong Li, Harry Ward, Pilar A. Letrondo, Madeleine Morelli-Batters, Andrea Bruun, Rongyu Lin, Talen Wright, Naaheed Mukadam\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41380-025-03129-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Previous meta-analyses have found that systemic medications may modulate dementia risk. We aimed to provide an overview of this evidence to guide clinical practice and future research.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses (PROSPERO CRD42021226307), searching databases from inception to 15th April 2024. Only peer-reviewed meta-analyses examining dementia risk and systemic medications in humans were included. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted study data and assessed quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Three authors independently rated the certainty of evidence for each drug using the GRADE framework.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>68 meta-analyses were included, across 11 drug categories. Across meta-analyses, available data were primarily observational. Confounding by indication and potential reverse causality were important limitations. Randomised-controlled data were rare but supported an association between treatment of hypertension and reduced dementia incidence. Overall, we found moderate certainty evidence of reduced risk of dementia associated with anti-hypertensives, statins, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and moderate certainty of increased risk with anticholinergics.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Discussion</h3><p>Currently, there is insufficient evidence to advise repurposing any systemic drugs with the primary aim of reducing dementia risk. On the basis of our findings, we recommend proactive treatment of hypertension to reduce risk of all-cause dementia. Our findings did not find a difference between antihypertensive drug classes, but dementia risk was associated with blood pressure reading. In addition, we advise avoidance of anticholinergic drugs in cognitive impairment, with assessment of anticholinergic burden and consideration of alternatives during routine clinical contacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03129-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03129-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的荟萃分析发现,全身性药物可能会调节痴呆症的风险。我们的目的是概述这些证据,以指导临床实践和未来的研究。方法:我们对meta分析(PROSPERO CRD42021226307)进行了总括性回顾,检索了从建立到2024年4月15日的数据库。仅纳入了同行评审的荟萃分析,研究了人类痴呆风险和全身药物。两位作者独立筛选纳入的研究,提取研究数据,并使用AMSTAR-2工具评估meta分析的质量。三位作者使用GRADE框架对每种药物的证据确定性进行了独立评估。结果纳入了68项荟萃分析,涉及11个药物类别。在荟萃分析中,可用的数据主要是观察性的。适应症的混淆和潜在的反向因果关系是重要的限制。随机对照数据很少,但支持高血压治疗与降低痴呆发病率之间的关联。总的来说,我们发现中度确定的证据表明,抗高血压药物、他汀类药物、钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)可降低痴呆风险,而抗胆碱能药物可增加痴呆风险。目前,没有足够的证据建议以降低痴呆风险为主要目的重新使用任何全身药物。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议积极治疗高血压以降低全因痴呆的风险。我们的研究结果没有发现降压药种类之间的差异,但痴呆风险与血压读数有关。此外,我们建议认知障碍患者避免使用抗胆碱能药物,评估抗胆碱能负担并在常规临床接触中考虑替代药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Systemic medications and dementia risk: a systematic umbrella review

Systemic medications and dementia risk: a systematic umbrella review

Background

Previous meta-analyses have found that systemic medications may modulate dementia risk. We aimed to provide an overview of this evidence to guide clinical practice and future research.

Methods

We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses (PROSPERO CRD42021226307), searching databases from inception to 15th April 2024. Only peer-reviewed meta-analyses examining dementia risk and systemic medications in humans were included. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted study data and assessed quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Three authors independently rated the certainty of evidence for each drug using the GRADE framework.

Results

68 meta-analyses were included, across 11 drug categories. Across meta-analyses, available data were primarily observational. Confounding by indication and potential reverse causality were important limitations. Randomised-controlled data were rare but supported an association between treatment of hypertension and reduced dementia incidence. Overall, we found moderate certainty evidence of reduced risk of dementia associated with anti-hypertensives, statins, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and moderate certainty of increased risk with anticholinergics.

Discussion

Currently, there is insufficient evidence to advise repurposing any systemic drugs with the primary aim of reducing dementia risk. On the basis of our findings, we recommend proactive treatment of hypertension to reduce risk of all-cause dementia. Our findings did not find a difference between antihypertensive drug classes, but dementia risk was associated with blood pressure reading. In addition, we advise avoidance of anticholinergic drugs in cognitive impairment, with assessment of anticholinergic burden and consideration of alternatives during routine clinical contacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信