利用机器学习预测血管内主动脉髂血管重建术后的预后

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ben Li, Badr Aljabri, Derek Beaton, Leen Al-Omran, Mohamad A. Hussain, Douglas S. Lee, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Ori D. Rotstein, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani, Mohammed Al-Omran
{"title":"利用机器学习预测血管内主动脉髂血管重建术后的预后","authors":"Ben Li, Badr Aljabri, Derek Beaton, Leen Al-Omran, Mohamad A. Hussain, Douglas S. Lee, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Ori D. Rotstein, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani, Mohammed Al-Omran","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01865-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Endovascular aortoiliac revascularization is a common treatment option for peripheral artery disease that carries non-negligible risks. Outcome prediction tools may support clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning algorithms that predict 30-day post-procedural outcomes. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent endovascular aortoiliac revascularization between 2011–2021. Input features included 37 pre-operative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day post-procedural major adverse limb event (MALE) or death. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 machine learning models were trained using pre-operative features. Overall, 6601 patients were included, and 30-day MALE/death occurred in 470 (7.1%) individuals. The best-performing model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.93–0.95). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.74 (0.73–0.76). The XGBoost model accurately predicted 30-day post-procedural outcomes, performing better than logistic regression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting outcomes following endovascular aortoiliac revascularization using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Ben Li, Badr Aljabri, Derek Beaton, Leen Al-Omran, Mohamad A. Hussain, Douglas S. Lee, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Ori D. Rotstein, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani, Mohammed Al-Omran\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01865-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Endovascular aortoiliac revascularization is a common treatment option for peripheral artery disease that carries non-negligible risks. Outcome prediction tools may support clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning algorithms that predict 30-day post-procedural outcomes. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent endovascular aortoiliac revascularization between 2011–2021. Input features included 37 pre-operative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day post-procedural major adverse limb event (MALE) or death. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 machine learning models were trained using pre-operative features. Overall, 6601 patients were included, and 30-day MALE/death occurred in 470 (7.1%) individuals. The best-performing model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.93–0.95). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.74 (0.73–0.76). The XGBoost model accurately predicted 30-day post-procedural outcomes, performing better than logistic regression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01865-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01865-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血管内髂主动脉血管重建术是外周动脉疾病的一种常见治疗选择,它具有不可忽视的风险。结果预测工具可能支持临床决策,但仍然有限。我们开发了机器学习算法来预测手术后30天的结果。使用国家外科质量改进计划靶向血管数据库来识别2011-2021年间接受血管内主动脉髂血管重建术的患者。输入特征包括37个术前人口学/临床变量。主要转归为术后30天主要肢体不良事件(MALE)或死亡。数据分为训练集(70%)和测试集(30%)。使用10倍交叉验证,使用术前特征训练6个机器学习模型。总共纳入6601例患者,其中470例(7.1%)发生30天男性死亡。表现最好的模型是XGBoost, AUROC (95% CI)为0.94(0.93-0.95)。相比之下,logistic回归的AUROC (95% CI)为0.74(0.73-0.76)。XGBoost模型准确预测手术后30天的预后,优于逻辑回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting outcomes following endovascular aortoiliac revascularization using machine learning

Predicting outcomes following endovascular aortoiliac revascularization using machine learning

Endovascular aortoiliac revascularization is a common treatment option for peripheral artery disease that carries non-negligible risks. Outcome prediction tools may support clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning algorithms that predict 30-day post-procedural outcomes. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent endovascular aortoiliac revascularization between 2011–2021. Input features included 37 pre-operative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day post-procedural major adverse limb event (MALE) or death. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 machine learning models were trained using pre-operative features. Overall, 6601 patients were included, and 30-day MALE/death occurred in 470 (7.1%) individuals. The best-performing model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.93–0.95). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.74 (0.73–0.76). The XGBoost model accurately predicted 30-day post-procedural outcomes, performing better than logistic regression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信