小脑认知情感/Schmahmann综合征量表:更新和见解。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Maia Hirsch, Brigitte Jacoby, Samantha Pierce, Jason MacMore, Jeremy D Schmahmann
{"title":"小脑认知情感/Schmahmann综合征量表:更新和见解。","authors":"Maia Hirsch, Brigitte Jacoby, Samantha Pierce, Jason MacMore, Jeremy D Schmahmann","doi":"10.1007/s12311-025-01890-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective / Schmahmann Syndrome scale (CCAS-S) detects cognitive and neuropsychiatric changes in cerebellar disease (CD). It has good sensitivity and specificity, but a false positive rate ~ 5%. We determined that healthy controls (HC) fail digit span tasks (DS) when presented with one repetition opportunity. We tested the hypothesis that providing participants a second attempt at DS would improve performance and decrease false positive rate. We also evaluated influence of age and education on CCAS-S scores. We administered the CCAS-S to 50 CD and 85 HC, providing a second attempt at forward / reverse DS for each failed number sequence, using either the same numbers, or a different set of numbers of the same length. Performance with same vs different digits was identical. After second DS attempt, raw score increased: HC, 106.1 ± 9.4 to 106.8 ± 9.2; CD, 89.2 ± 15.5 to 90.6 ± 15.8, and failed domains decreased: HC, 0.67 ± 0.89 to 0.4 ± 0.73; CD, 2.62 ± 1.9 to 2.24 ± 1.9. False positive definite CCAS (≥ 3 failed domains) decreased in HC, 4.7% to 1.2%. In CD, definite CCAS remained high, 48% to 38%. Some older HC failed ≥ 3 domains. Education (all ≥ 12 years) did not impact performance in HC; CD with more education failed fewer domains. False positive definite CCAS-S was reduced to 1.2% by second attempt at forward and backward DS. The CCAS-S detected incipient cognitive impairment in older individuals. Education effects were modest, but cohorts with education ≤ 11 years need further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50706,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum","volume":"24 5","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Updates and Insights.\",\"authors\":\"Maia Hirsch, Brigitte Jacoby, Samantha Pierce, Jason MacMore, Jeremy D Schmahmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12311-025-01890-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective / Schmahmann Syndrome scale (CCAS-S) detects cognitive and neuropsychiatric changes in cerebellar disease (CD). It has good sensitivity and specificity, but a false positive rate ~ 5%. We determined that healthy controls (HC) fail digit span tasks (DS) when presented with one repetition opportunity. We tested the hypothesis that providing participants a second attempt at DS would improve performance and decrease false positive rate. We also evaluated influence of age and education on CCAS-S scores. We administered the CCAS-S to 50 CD and 85 HC, providing a second attempt at forward / reverse DS for each failed number sequence, using either the same numbers, or a different set of numbers of the same length. Performance with same vs different digits was identical. After second DS attempt, raw score increased: HC, 106.1 ± 9.4 to 106.8 ± 9.2; CD, 89.2 ± 15.5 to 90.6 ± 15.8, and failed domains decreased: HC, 0.67 ± 0.89 to 0.4 ± 0.73; CD, 2.62 ± 1.9 to 2.24 ± 1.9. False positive definite CCAS (≥ 3 failed domains) decreased in HC, 4.7% to 1.2%. In CD, definite CCAS remained high, 48% to 38%. Some older HC failed ≥ 3 domains. Education (all ≥ 12 years) did not impact performance in HC; CD with more education failed fewer domains. False positive definite CCAS-S was reduced to 1.2% by second attempt at forward and backward DS. The CCAS-S detected incipient cognitive impairment in older individuals. Education effects were modest, but cohorts with education ≤ 11 years need further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebellum\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebellum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-025-01890-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-025-01890-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小脑认知情感/ Schmahmann综合征量表(CCAS-S)检测小脑疾病(CD)的认知和神经精神改变。具有良好的敏感性和特异性,但假阳性率为5%。我们确定健康对照(HC)在提供一次重复机会时数字跨度任务(DS)失败。我们对假设进行了检验,即让参与者进行第二次DS测试可以提高他们的表现并降低误报率。我们还评估了年龄和教育程度对CCAS-S分数的影响。我们将CCAS-S应用于50个CD和85个HC,为每个失败的数字序列提供第二次正向/反向DS尝试,使用相同的数字或相同长度的不同数字集。相同数字和不同数字的性能是相同的。第二次DS尝试后,原始评分从HC的106.1±9.4提高到106.8±9.2;CD从89.2±15.5降至90.6±15.8,失效域减少:HC从0.67±0.89降至0.4±0.73;CD为2.62±1.9 ~ 2.24±1.9。假阳性确定CCAS(≥3个失败域)在HC中下降了4.7%至1.2%。在CD中,明确的CCAS仍然很高,为48%至38%。一些老HC≥3个结构域失效。教育程度(≥12年)不影响HC患者的表现;受过更多教育的CD在更少的领域失败。通过第二次正反向DS检测,假阳性确定CCAS-S降至1.2%。CCAS-S检测老年人早期认知障碍。教育效果一般,但受教育≤11年的队列需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Updates and Insights.

The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective / Schmahmann Syndrome scale (CCAS-S) detects cognitive and neuropsychiatric changes in cerebellar disease (CD). It has good sensitivity and specificity, but a false positive rate ~ 5%. We determined that healthy controls (HC) fail digit span tasks (DS) when presented with one repetition opportunity. We tested the hypothesis that providing participants a second attempt at DS would improve performance and decrease false positive rate. We also evaluated influence of age and education on CCAS-S scores. We administered the CCAS-S to 50 CD and 85 HC, providing a second attempt at forward / reverse DS for each failed number sequence, using either the same numbers, or a different set of numbers of the same length. Performance with same vs different digits was identical. After second DS attempt, raw score increased: HC, 106.1 ± 9.4 to 106.8 ± 9.2; CD, 89.2 ± 15.5 to 90.6 ± 15.8, and failed domains decreased: HC, 0.67 ± 0.89 to 0.4 ± 0.73; CD, 2.62 ± 1.9 to 2.24 ± 1.9. False positive definite CCAS (≥ 3 failed domains) decreased in HC, 4.7% to 1.2%. In CD, definite CCAS remained high, 48% to 38%. Some older HC failed ≥ 3 domains. Education (all ≥ 12 years) did not impact performance in HC; CD with more education failed fewer domains. False positive definite CCAS-S was reduced to 1.2% by second attempt at forward and backward DS. The CCAS-S detected incipient cognitive impairment in older individuals. Education effects were modest, but cohorts with education ≤ 11 years need further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebellum
Cerebellum 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Official publication of the Society for Research on the Cerebellum devoted to genetics of cerebellar ataxias, role of cerebellum in motor control and cognitive function, and amid an ageing population, diseases associated with cerebellar dysfunction. The Cerebellum is a central source for the latest developments in fundamental neurosciences including molecular and cellular biology; behavioural neurosciences and neurochemistry; genetics; fundamental and clinical neurophysiology; neurology and neuropathology; cognition and neuroimaging. The Cerebellum benefits neuroscientists in molecular and cellular biology; neurophysiologists; researchers in neurotransmission; neurologists; radiologists; paediatricians; neuropsychologists; students of neurology and psychiatry and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信