控制感与全因死亡率之间的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2025021
Ying Li, Yilin Chen, Xiwen Ding, Yin Chen, Wei Jiang
{"title":"控制感与全因死亡率之间的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Ying Li, Yilin Chen, Xiwen Ding, Yin Chen, Wei Jiang","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2025021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The salutary effects of a sense of control on health are well acknowledged; however, rigorous studies evaluating its effect on mortality remain scarce. This study aimed to study the association between a sense of control and mortality and to identify the effect of changes in this sense of control on mortality risk. This prospective cohort study included 22,793 participants over age 50 and their spouses, drawn from a nationally representative U.S. sample from 2006 to 2018. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses estimated the association between sense of control and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, and changes in sense of control levels associated with mortality risk were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Over the 12-year follow-up period, 5027 deaths were recorded. An increased sense of control was significantly associated with decreased mortality risk, as revealed by stratified analysis according to sex and age. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the second, third, and fourth quartiles of sense of control levels were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), respectively, relative to the first quartile. Compared to individuals with stable sense of control scores from baseline to study conclusion, the HR was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.70) for those with increased scores and 1.81 (95% CI, 1.53-2.13) for those with decreased scores. High levels of sense of control were significantly associated with reduced mortality risk. These findings underscore the importance of a sense of control as a focus for public health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"12 2","pages":"360-377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between sense of control and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Li, Yilin Chen, Xiwen Ding, Yin Chen, Wei Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/publichealth.2025021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The salutary effects of a sense of control on health are well acknowledged; however, rigorous studies evaluating its effect on mortality remain scarce. This study aimed to study the association between a sense of control and mortality and to identify the effect of changes in this sense of control on mortality risk. This prospective cohort study included 22,793 participants over age 50 and their spouses, drawn from a nationally representative U.S. sample from 2006 to 2018. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses estimated the association between sense of control and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, and changes in sense of control levels associated with mortality risk were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Over the 12-year follow-up period, 5027 deaths were recorded. An increased sense of control was significantly associated with decreased mortality risk, as revealed by stratified analysis according to sex and age. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the second, third, and fourth quartiles of sense of control levels were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), respectively, relative to the first quartile. Compared to individuals with stable sense of control scores from baseline to study conclusion, the HR was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.70) for those with increased scores and 1.81 (95% CI, 1.53-2.13) for those with decreased scores. High levels of sense of control were significantly associated with reduced mortality risk. These findings underscore the importance of a sense of control as a focus for public health interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"360-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277782/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2025021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2025021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

控制感对健康的有益影响是公认的;然而,评估其对死亡率影响的严谨研究仍然很少。本研究旨在研究控制感与死亡率之间的关系,并确定这种控制感的变化对死亡风险的影响。这项前瞻性队列研究包括22793名50岁以上的参与者及其配偶,这些参与者来自2006年至2018年具有全国代表性的美国样本。Cox比例风险回归分析估计了控制感与全因死亡率之间的关系。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线采用log-rank检验进行比较,与死亡风险相关的控制感水平变化采用Cox比例风险模型进行评估。在12年的随访期间,记录了5027例死亡。根据性别和年龄进行的分层分析显示,控制感的增强与死亡率风险的降低显著相关。相对于第一个四分位数,控制感水平的第二、第三和第四个四分位数的风险比(hr)分别为0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98)、0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92)和0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87)。与从基线到研究结论控制感得分稳定的个体相比,得分升高者的HR为0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.70),得分降低者的HR为1.81 (95% CI, 1.53-2.13)。高水平的控制感与降低死亡风险显著相关。这些发现强调了控制感作为公共卫生干预重点的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association between sense of control and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study.

Association between sense of control and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study.

Association between sense of control and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study.

Association between sense of control and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study.

The salutary effects of a sense of control on health are well acknowledged; however, rigorous studies evaluating its effect on mortality remain scarce. This study aimed to study the association between a sense of control and mortality and to identify the effect of changes in this sense of control on mortality risk. This prospective cohort study included 22,793 participants over age 50 and their spouses, drawn from a nationally representative U.S. sample from 2006 to 2018. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses estimated the association between sense of control and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, and changes in sense of control levels associated with mortality risk were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Over the 12-year follow-up period, 5027 deaths were recorded. An increased sense of control was significantly associated with decreased mortality risk, as revealed by stratified analysis according to sex and age. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the second, third, and fourth quartiles of sense of control levels were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), respectively, relative to the first quartile. Compared to individuals with stable sense of control scores from baseline to study conclusion, the HR was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.70) for those with increased scores and 1.81 (95% CI, 1.53-2.13) for those with decreased scores. High levels of sense of control were significantly associated with reduced mortality risk. These findings underscore the importance of a sense of control as a focus for public health interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信