Tieshi Zhu, Yong He, Yuzhang Bei, Hui Mai, Le Zhao
{"title":"与阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷单药治疗与更高的死亡风险相关:对NHANES 1999-2018的回顾性分析。","authors":"Tieshi Zhu, Yong He, Yuzhang Bei, Hui Mai, Le Zhao","doi":"10.1080/09537104.2025.2532454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clopidogrel and aspirin are widely used antiplatelet agents. Although clopidogrel resistance is more prevalent in Asian populations, a Korean study suggested that clopidogrel was superior to aspirin in patients who completed standard dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the comparative effectiveness of clopidogrel versus aspirin in populations with lower levels of clopidogrel resistance remains to be further investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1,007 participants from NHANES 1999-2018 who were receiving aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare the risks of mortality between the two groups. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding individuals who died within the first 6 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all Cox models, clopidogrel use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (Model 1, HR1.47, 95%CI 1.20-1.79, <i>p</i> < .01; Model 2, HR1.25, 95%CI 1.02-1.54, <i>p</i> = .03; Model 3, HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.08-1.64, <i>p</i> = .01; Model 4, HR1.31, 95%CI 1.06-1.63, <i>p</i> = .01), stroke and cardiac mortality (Model 1, HR1.76, 95%CI 1.27-2.43, <i>p</i> < .01; Model 2, HR1.41, 95%CI 1.01-1.97, <i>p</i> = .04; Model 3, HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.17, <i>p</i> = .01; Model 4, HR1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08, <i>p</i> = .03) compared with aspirin. These associations remained consistent in sensitivity analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves also indicated higher risks of all-cause mortality, stroke and cardiac mortality in the clopidogrel group relative to the aspirin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this community-based population, clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality, stroke and cardiac mortality compared with aspirin.</p>","PeriodicalId":20268,"journal":{"name":"Platelets","volume":"36 1","pages":"2532454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clopidogrel monotherapy is associated with higher mortality risk compared to aspirin: a retrospective analysis of NHANES 1999-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Tieshi Zhu, Yong He, Yuzhang Bei, Hui Mai, Le Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09537104.2025.2532454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clopidogrel and aspirin are widely used antiplatelet agents. Although clopidogrel resistance is more prevalent in Asian populations, a Korean study suggested that clopidogrel was superior to aspirin in patients who completed standard dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the comparative effectiveness of clopidogrel versus aspirin in populations with lower levels of clopidogrel resistance remains to be further investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1,007 participants from NHANES 1999-2018 who were receiving aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare the risks of mortality between the two groups. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding individuals who died within the first 6 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all Cox models, clopidogrel use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (Model 1, HR1.47, 95%CI 1.20-1.79, <i>p</i> < .01; Model 2, HR1.25, 95%CI 1.02-1.54, <i>p</i> = .03; Model 3, HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.08-1.64, <i>p</i> = .01; Model 4, HR1.31, 95%CI 1.06-1.63, <i>p</i> = .01), stroke and cardiac mortality (Model 1, HR1.76, 95%CI 1.27-2.43, <i>p</i> < .01; Model 2, HR1.41, 95%CI 1.01-1.97, <i>p</i> = .04; Model 3, HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.17, <i>p</i> = .01; Model 4, HR1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08, <i>p</i> = .03) compared with aspirin. These associations remained consistent in sensitivity analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves also indicated higher risks of all-cause mortality, stroke and cardiac mortality in the clopidogrel group relative to the aspirin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this community-based population, clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality, stroke and cardiac mortality compared with aspirin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Platelets\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2532454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Platelets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2025.2532454\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Platelets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2025.2532454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:氯吡格雷和阿司匹林是广泛应用的抗血小板药物。尽管氯吡格雷耐药在亚洲人群中更为普遍,但韩国的一项研究表明,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后完成标准双重抗血小板治疗的患者中,氯吡格雷优于阿司匹林。然而,氯吡格雷与阿司匹林在氯吡格雷耐药水平较低人群中的相对有效性仍有待进一步研究。方法:本研究纳入了1999-2018年NHANES中1007名接受阿司匹林或氯吡格雷单药治疗的参与者。采用Cox比例风险回归和Kaplan-Meier生存分析比较两组患者的死亡风险。通过排除随访前6个月内死亡的个体进行敏感性分析。结果:在所有Cox模型中,氯吡格雷使用与全因死亡风险显著升高相关(模型1,HR1.47, 95%CI 1.20-1.79, p p = 0.03;模型3,HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.08 ~ 1.64, p = 0.01;模型4,HR1.31, 95%CI 1.06-1.63, p = 0.01),卒中和心脏死亡率(模型1,HR1.76, 95%CI 1.27-2.43, p = 0.04;模型3,HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.17, p = 0.01;模型4,HR1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08, p = .03)。这些关联在敏感性分析中保持一致。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线还显示,与阿司匹林组相比,氯吡格雷组的全因死亡率、中风和心脏死亡率风险更高。结论:在这个以社区为基础的人群中,与阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷单药治疗与更高的全因死亡率、中风和心脏死亡率相关。
Clopidogrel monotherapy is associated with higher mortality risk compared to aspirin: a retrospective analysis of NHANES 1999-2018.
Background: Clopidogrel and aspirin are widely used antiplatelet agents. Although clopidogrel resistance is more prevalent in Asian populations, a Korean study suggested that clopidogrel was superior to aspirin in patients who completed standard dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the comparative effectiveness of clopidogrel versus aspirin in populations with lower levels of clopidogrel resistance remains to be further investigated.
Methods: This study included 1,007 participants from NHANES 1999-2018 who were receiving aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare the risks of mortality between the two groups. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding individuals who died within the first 6 months of follow-up.
Results: Across all Cox models, clopidogrel use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (Model 1, HR1.47, 95%CI 1.20-1.79, p < .01; Model 2, HR1.25, 95%CI 1.02-1.54, p = .03; Model 3, HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.08-1.64, p = .01; Model 4, HR1.31, 95%CI 1.06-1.63, p = .01), stroke and cardiac mortality (Model 1, HR1.76, 95%CI 1.27-2.43, p < .01; Model 2, HR1.41, 95%CI 1.01-1.97, p = .04; Model 3, HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.17, p = .01; Model 4, HR1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08, p = .03) compared with aspirin. These associations remained consistent in sensitivity analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves also indicated higher risks of all-cause mortality, stroke and cardiac mortality in the clopidogrel group relative to the aspirin group.
Conclusion: In this community-based population, clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality, stroke and cardiac mortality compared with aspirin.
期刊介绍:
Platelets is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of platelet- and megakaryocyte-related research.
Platelets provides the opportunity for contributors and readers across scientific disciplines to engage with new information about blood platelets. The journal’s Methods section aims to improve standardization between laboratories and to help researchers replicate difficult methods.
Research areas include:
Platelet function
Biochemistry
Signal transduction
Pharmacology and therapeutics
Interaction with other cells in the blood vessel wall
The contribution of platelets and platelet-derived products to health and disease
The journal publishes original articles, fast-track articles, review articles, systematic reviews, methods papers, short communications, case reports, opinion articles, commentaries, gene of the issue, and letters to the editor.
Platelets operates a single-blind peer review policy. Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.