KFLC与CSF总蛋白比值可替代KFLC指数诊断多发性硬化症:814例回顾性研究

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Estelle Moschetti, Mélany Venet, Lise Thibaudin, Amelie Moreau, Philippe Gonzalo, Jean-Philippe Camdessanche, Yannick Tholance
{"title":"KFLC与CSF总蛋白比值可替代KFLC指数诊断多发性硬化症:814例回顾性研究","authors":"Estelle Moschetti, Mélany Venet, Lise Thibaudin, Amelie Moreau, Philippe Gonzalo, Jean-Philippe Camdessanche, Yannick Tholance","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Biological analyses are crucial for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS), notably detection of oligoclonal bands (OCBs) of immunoglobulin G in CSF. Kappa free light chain (KFLC) quantification in serum and CSF has recently been proposed as an additional test. In a rational medicoeconomic approach, identifying algorithms or biomarkers is important. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the correlation between CSF kappa free light chain (KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>)/total CSF protein ratio (KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub>) and OCB status and its performance in diagnosing MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>KFLC measurements were performed prospectively with each OCB analysis, and the data were interpreted retrospectively. A total of 814 clinical cases were included: 153 with MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 181 with other inflammatory neurologic diseases, and 480 with noninflammatory neurologic diseases. Performances of KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> in predicting OCB status, diagnosing MS, and estimating evolution of CIS to MS were evaluated and compared with those of other KFLC parameters, i.e., KFLC index, and with OCB and IgG parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> and KFLC index performed similarly in predicting OCB status, with a sensitivity of 80.2% and a specificity of 93.4% at a threshold >0.21% for KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> (area under the curve: 0.93). The percentage of agreement between OCB status and KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> was 91.2%. Using KFLC<sub>CSF</sub> and KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> initially could reduce OCB testing by 68% and quantitative tests by 48.4%. For diagnosing MS/CIS, KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> performed similar to or slightly worse than the KFLC index but always outperformed IgG, OCB, and KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>. For this indication, the optimal threshold for KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> was >0.24%. It is important to note that KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> was the most predictive parameter for CIS progression to MS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To conclude, KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> is as an easier and cost-effective alternative for predicting OCB status and CIS progression to MS and assisting in the diagnosis of MS.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class II evidence that the KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Protein<sub>CSF</sub> ratio accurately distinguishes patients with CSF OCBs from those without CSF OCBs and patients with MS from those with other neurologic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 5","pages":"e200451"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KFLC to Total CSF Protein Ratio Is an Alternative to KFLC Index to Diagnose Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Study of 814 Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Estelle Moschetti, Mélany Venet, Lise Thibaudin, Amelie Moreau, Philippe Gonzalo, Jean-Philippe Camdessanche, Yannick Tholance\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Biological analyses are crucial for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS), notably detection of oligoclonal bands (OCBs) of immunoglobulin G in CSF. Kappa free light chain (KFLC) quantification in serum and CSF has recently been proposed as an additional test. In a rational medicoeconomic approach, identifying algorithms or biomarkers is important. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the correlation between CSF kappa free light chain (KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>)/total CSF protein ratio (KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub>) and OCB status and its performance in diagnosing MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>KFLC measurements were performed prospectively with each OCB analysis, and the data were interpreted retrospectively. A total of 814 clinical cases were included: 153 with MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 181 with other inflammatory neurologic diseases, and 480 with noninflammatory neurologic diseases. Performances of KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> in predicting OCB status, diagnosing MS, and estimating evolution of CIS to MS were evaluated and compared with those of other KFLC parameters, i.e., KFLC index, and with OCB and IgG parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> and KFLC index performed similarly in predicting OCB status, with a sensitivity of 80.2% and a specificity of 93.4% at a threshold >0.21% for KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> (area under the curve: 0.93). The percentage of agreement between OCB status and KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> was 91.2%. Using KFLC<sub>CSF</sub> and KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> initially could reduce OCB testing by 68% and quantitative tests by 48.4%. For diagnosing MS/CIS, KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> performed similar to or slightly worse than the KFLC index but always outperformed IgG, OCB, and KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>. For this indication, the optimal threshold for KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> was >0.24%. It is important to note that KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> was the most predictive parameter for CIS progression to MS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To conclude, KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Prot<sub>CSF</sub> is as an easier and cost-effective alternative for predicting OCB status and CIS progression to MS and assisting in the diagnosis of MS.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class II evidence that the KFLC<sub>CSF</sub>/Protein<sub>CSF</sub> ratio accurately distinguishes patients with CSF OCBs from those without CSF OCBs and patients with MS from those with other neurologic disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"e200451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200451\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200451","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:生物学分析是诊断多发性硬化症(MS)的关键,特别是检测脑脊液中免疫球蛋白G的寡克隆带(ocb)。血清和脑脊液中的Kappa游离轻链(KFLC)定量最近被提议作为一种附加的检测方法。在理性的医学经济学方法中,识别算法或生物标记物很重要。因此,本研究的目的是评估脑脊液游离轻链(KFLCCSF)/总脑脊液蛋白比(KFLCCSF/ProtCSF)与OCB状态的相关性及其在ms诊断中的作用。方法:每次OCB分析均前瞻性地进行KFLC测量,并对数据进行回顾性解释。共纳入814例临床病例:MS或临床孤立综合征(CIS) 153例,其他炎性神经系统疾病181例,非炎性神经系统疾病480例。评价KFLCCSF/ProtCSF在预测OCB状态、诊断多发性硬化症、估计CIS向多发性硬化症演变等方面的性能,并与其他KFLC参数(即KFLC指数)、OCB和IgG参数进行比较。结果:KFLCCSF/ProtCSF和KFLC指数在预测OCB状态方面表现相似,KFLCCSF/ProtCSF的敏感性为80.2%,特异性为93.4%,阈值为0.21%(曲线下面积:0.93)。OCB状态与KFLCCSF/ProtCSF的符合率为91.2%。最初使用KFLCCSF和KFLCCSF/ProtCSF可以减少68%的OCB测试和48.4%的定量测试。对于MS/CIS的诊断,KFLCCSF/ProtCSF的表现与KFLC指数相似或略差,但总是优于IgG、OCB和KFLCCSF。对于该适应症,KFLCCSF/ProtCSF的最佳阈值为0.0.24%。值得注意的是,KFLCCSF/ProtCSF是最能预测CIS进展为MS的参数。综上所述,KFLCCSF/ProtCSF是预测OCB状态和CIS进展为MS并协助MS诊断的一种更简单、成本效益更高的替代方法。该研究提供了II级证据,证明KFLCCSF/ProteinCSF比值能够准确区分脑脊液ocb患者与非脑脊液ocb患者,以及MS患者与其他神经系统疾病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KFLC to Total CSF Protein Ratio Is an Alternative to KFLC Index to Diagnose Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Study of 814 Cases.

Background and objectives: Biological analyses are crucial for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS), notably detection of oligoclonal bands (OCBs) of immunoglobulin G in CSF. Kappa free light chain (KFLC) quantification in serum and CSF has recently been proposed as an additional test. In a rational medicoeconomic approach, identifying algorithms or biomarkers is important. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the correlation between CSF kappa free light chain (KFLCCSF)/total CSF protein ratio (KFLCCSF/ProtCSF) and OCB status and its performance in diagnosing MS.

Methods: KFLC measurements were performed prospectively with each OCB analysis, and the data were interpreted retrospectively. A total of 814 clinical cases were included: 153 with MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 181 with other inflammatory neurologic diseases, and 480 with noninflammatory neurologic diseases. Performances of KFLCCSF/ProtCSF in predicting OCB status, diagnosing MS, and estimating evolution of CIS to MS were evaluated and compared with those of other KFLC parameters, i.e., KFLC index, and with OCB and IgG parameters.

Results: KFLCCSF/ProtCSF and KFLC index performed similarly in predicting OCB status, with a sensitivity of 80.2% and a specificity of 93.4% at a threshold >0.21% for KFLCCSF/ProtCSF (area under the curve: 0.93). The percentage of agreement between OCB status and KFLCCSF/ProtCSF was 91.2%. Using KFLCCSF and KFLCCSF/ProtCSF initially could reduce OCB testing by 68% and quantitative tests by 48.4%. For diagnosing MS/CIS, KFLCCSF/ProtCSF performed similar to or slightly worse than the KFLC index but always outperformed IgG, OCB, and KFLCCSF. For this indication, the optimal threshold for KFLCCSF/ProtCSF was >0.24%. It is important to note that KFLCCSF/ProtCSF was the most predictive parameter for CIS progression to MS.

Discussion: To conclude, KFLCCSF/ProtCSF is as an easier and cost-effective alternative for predicting OCB status and CIS progression to MS and assisting in the diagnosis of MS.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that the KFLCCSF/ProteinCSF ratio accurately distinguishes patients with CSF OCBs from those without CSF OCBs and patients with MS from those with other neurologic disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信