在急诊科设置病毒性肝炎自动筛查的可接受性:患者和卫生保健工作者的观点。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tahrima Kayes, Julia Di Girolamo, David S Prince, Harry Crane, Joseph Pipicella, Melissa Bagatella, Nathan Jones, Paul M Middleton, Miriam T Levy
{"title":"在急诊科设置病毒性肝炎自动筛查的可接受性:患者和卫生保健工作者的观点。","authors":"Tahrima Kayes, Julia Di Girolamo, David S Prince, Harry Crane, Joseph Pipicella, Melissa Bagatella, Nathan Jones, Paul M Middleton, Miriam T Levy","doi":"10.1111/imj.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for viral hepatitis by automatically ordering hepatitis B and C serology on blood samples already collected from patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is a relatively novel concept, with modest costs involved.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine patient and healthcare worker perspectives of automatic hepatitis screening at a large metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional survey study, patients admitted via ED and ED healthcare workers (HCWs) were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the level of patient and HCW acceptability of an automatic hepatitis screening process. Secondary outcomes were patient and HCW knowledge of viral hepatitis, perceptions and barriers to ED hepatitis screening in the absence of an automatic process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two percent of 273 patients who participated in the survey wished to know their viral hepatitis status, and 82% found automatic hepatitis B and C testing acceptable as part of their ED blood work. HCWs surveyed (48) believed this strategy would increase testing, as most did not routinely interrogate patients for risk factors or other eligibility criteria for hepatitis testing, as the presenting ED complaint was their priority. Even when indications for testing based on current guidelines were present, few (32%) HCWs initiated testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic viral hepatitis testing in ED is supported by the majority of patients and HCWs, and the latter believe it would increase testing rates. Increasing identification of patients with hepatitis, if accompanied by effective linkage to care, could facilitate World Health Organization elimination goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of automatic screening for viral hepatitis in an emergency department setting: patient and healthcare worker perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Tahrima Kayes, Julia Di Girolamo, David S Prince, Harry Crane, Joseph Pipicella, Melissa Bagatella, Nathan Jones, Paul M Middleton, Miriam T Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for viral hepatitis by automatically ordering hepatitis B and C serology on blood samples already collected from patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is a relatively novel concept, with modest costs involved.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine patient and healthcare worker perspectives of automatic hepatitis screening at a large metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional survey study, patients admitted via ED and ED healthcare workers (HCWs) were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the level of patient and HCW acceptability of an automatic hepatitis screening process. Secondary outcomes were patient and HCW knowledge of viral hepatitis, perceptions and barriers to ED hepatitis screening in the absence of an automatic process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two percent of 273 patients who participated in the survey wished to know their viral hepatitis status, and 82% found automatic hepatitis B and C testing acceptable as part of their ED blood work. HCWs surveyed (48) believed this strategy would increase testing, as most did not routinely interrogate patients for risk factors or other eligibility criteria for hepatitis testing, as the presenting ED complaint was their priority. Even when indications for testing based on current guidelines were present, few (32%) HCWs initiated testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic viral hepatitis testing in ED is supported by the majority of patients and HCWs, and the latter believe it would increase testing rates. Increasing identification of patients with hepatitis, if accompanied by effective linkage to care, could facilitate World Health Organization elimination goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过对急诊科(ED)患者已采集的血液样本进行乙型和丙型肝炎血清学自动排序筛查病毒性肝炎是一个相对较新的概念,成本适中。目的:本研究的目的是确定在澳大利亚悉尼的一家大型大都会医院患者和医护人员对自动肝炎筛查的看法。方法:在横断面调查研究中,通过急诊科入院的患者和急诊科医护人员(HCWs)被邀请参与。主要结果是患者和HCW对自动肝炎筛查过程的接受程度。次要结果是患者和HCW对病毒性肝炎的了解,在没有自动过程的情况下对ED肝炎筛查的认知和障碍。结果:参与调查的273名患者中有92%的人希望了解他们的病毒性肝炎状况,82%的人认为自动乙肝和丙肝检测可以作为ED血液工作的一部分。接受调查的医护人员(48人)认为这种策略会增加检测,因为大多数人没有常规询问患者的危险因素或其他肝炎检测的资格标准,因为出现ED的投诉是他们的首要任务。即使存在基于现行指南的检测指征,很少(32%)卫生保健工作者开始检测。结论:在ED中进行病毒性肝炎自动检测得到大多数患者和卫生保健工作者的支持,后者认为这可以提高检测率。增加对肝炎患者的识别,如果与护理有效联系起来,可以促进世界卫生组织消除肝炎的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability of automatic screening for viral hepatitis in an emergency department setting: patient and healthcare worker perspectives.

Background: Screening for viral hepatitis by automatically ordering hepatitis B and C serology on blood samples already collected from patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is a relatively novel concept, with modest costs involved.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine patient and healthcare worker perspectives of automatic hepatitis screening at a large metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia.

Methods: In this cross-sectional survey study, patients admitted via ED and ED healthcare workers (HCWs) were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the level of patient and HCW acceptability of an automatic hepatitis screening process. Secondary outcomes were patient and HCW knowledge of viral hepatitis, perceptions and barriers to ED hepatitis screening in the absence of an automatic process.

Results: Ninety-two percent of 273 patients who participated in the survey wished to know their viral hepatitis status, and 82% found automatic hepatitis B and C testing acceptable as part of their ED blood work. HCWs surveyed (48) believed this strategy would increase testing, as most did not routinely interrogate patients for risk factors or other eligibility criteria for hepatitis testing, as the presenting ED complaint was their priority. Even when indications for testing based on current guidelines were present, few (32%) HCWs initiated testing.

Conclusion: Automatic viral hepatitis testing in ED is supported by the majority of patients and HCWs, and the latter believe it would increase testing rates. Increasing identification of patients with hepatitis, if accompanied by effective linkage to care, could facilitate World Health Organization elimination goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信