Tahrima Kayes, Julia Di Girolamo, David S Prince, Harry Crane, Joseph Pipicella, Melissa Bagatella, Nathan Jones, Paul M Middleton, Miriam T Levy
{"title":"在急诊科设置病毒性肝炎自动筛查的可接受性:患者和卫生保健工作者的观点。","authors":"Tahrima Kayes, Julia Di Girolamo, David S Prince, Harry Crane, Joseph Pipicella, Melissa Bagatella, Nathan Jones, Paul M Middleton, Miriam T Levy","doi":"10.1111/imj.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for viral hepatitis by automatically ordering hepatitis B and C serology on blood samples already collected from patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is a relatively novel concept, with modest costs involved.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine patient and healthcare worker perspectives of automatic hepatitis screening at a large metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional survey study, patients admitted via ED and ED healthcare workers (HCWs) were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the level of patient and HCW acceptability of an automatic hepatitis screening process. Secondary outcomes were patient and HCW knowledge of viral hepatitis, perceptions and barriers to ED hepatitis screening in the absence of an automatic process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two percent of 273 patients who participated in the survey wished to know their viral hepatitis status, and 82% found automatic hepatitis B and C testing acceptable as part of their ED blood work. HCWs surveyed (48) believed this strategy would increase testing, as most did not routinely interrogate patients for risk factors or other eligibility criteria for hepatitis testing, as the presenting ED complaint was their priority. Even when indications for testing based on current guidelines were present, few (32%) HCWs initiated testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic viral hepatitis testing in ED is supported by the majority of patients and HCWs, and the latter believe it would increase testing rates. Increasing identification of patients with hepatitis, if accompanied by effective linkage to care, could facilitate World Health Organization elimination goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of automatic screening for viral hepatitis in an emergency department setting: patient and healthcare worker perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Tahrima Kayes, Julia Di Girolamo, David S Prince, Harry Crane, Joseph Pipicella, Melissa Bagatella, Nathan Jones, Paul M Middleton, Miriam T Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for viral hepatitis by automatically ordering hepatitis B and C serology on blood samples already collected from patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is a relatively novel concept, with modest costs involved.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine patient and healthcare worker perspectives of automatic hepatitis screening at a large metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional survey study, patients admitted via ED and ED healthcare workers (HCWs) were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the level of patient and HCW acceptability of an automatic hepatitis screening process. Secondary outcomes were patient and HCW knowledge of viral hepatitis, perceptions and barriers to ED hepatitis screening in the absence of an automatic process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two percent of 273 patients who participated in the survey wished to know their viral hepatitis status, and 82% found automatic hepatitis B and C testing acceptable as part of their ED blood work. HCWs surveyed (48) believed this strategy would increase testing, as most did not routinely interrogate patients for risk factors or other eligibility criteria for hepatitis testing, as the presenting ED complaint was their priority. Even when indications for testing based on current guidelines were present, few (32%) HCWs initiated testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic viral hepatitis testing in ED is supported by the majority of patients and HCWs, and the latter believe it would increase testing rates. Increasing identification of patients with hepatitis, if accompanied by effective linkage to care, could facilitate World Health Organization elimination goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Acceptability of automatic screening for viral hepatitis in an emergency department setting: patient and healthcare worker perspectives.
Background: Screening for viral hepatitis by automatically ordering hepatitis B and C serology on blood samples already collected from patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is a relatively novel concept, with modest costs involved.
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine patient and healthcare worker perspectives of automatic hepatitis screening at a large metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia.
Methods: In this cross-sectional survey study, patients admitted via ED and ED healthcare workers (HCWs) were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the level of patient and HCW acceptability of an automatic hepatitis screening process. Secondary outcomes were patient and HCW knowledge of viral hepatitis, perceptions and barriers to ED hepatitis screening in the absence of an automatic process.
Results: Ninety-two percent of 273 patients who participated in the survey wished to know their viral hepatitis status, and 82% found automatic hepatitis B and C testing acceptable as part of their ED blood work. HCWs surveyed (48) believed this strategy would increase testing, as most did not routinely interrogate patients for risk factors or other eligibility criteria for hepatitis testing, as the presenting ED complaint was their priority. Even when indications for testing based on current guidelines were present, few (32%) HCWs initiated testing.
Conclusion: Automatic viral hepatitis testing in ED is supported by the majority of patients and HCWs, and the latter believe it would increase testing rates. Increasing identification of patients with hepatitis, if accompanied by effective linkage to care, could facilitate World Health Organization elimination goals.
期刊介绍:
The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.