加强参与以支持血友病中的共同决策:为血友病患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员开发材料。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Haemophilia Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1111/hae.70062
Laura Meade, Haowei (Linda) Sun, Robert J. Klaassen, Roxana Bahar, Shade Olatunde, Michelle Santos, Sheri vanGunst
{"title":"加强参与以支持血友病中的共同决策:为血友病患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员开发材料。","authors":"Laura Meade,&nbsp;Haowei (Linda) Sun,&nbsp;Robert J. Klaassen,&nbsp;Roxana Bahar,&nbsp;Shade Olatunde,&nbsp;Michelle Santos,&nbsp;Sheri vanGunst","doi":"10.1111/hae.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Treatment decision making can be complex and challenging for people with haemophilia (PwH) and their caregivers. A shared decision-making (SDM) approach can ensure that decisions about treatment and care incorporate patients’ beliefs, values, and preferences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The aims were to: (1) identify potential drivers and barriers to SDM between PwH/caregivers and clinicians, (2) develop tools to facilitate SDM in clinic appointments, and (3) gain feedback on the usability and design of these tools to inform refinements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Virtual focus groups were conducted with adolescent and adult PwH, caregivers of children with haemophilia, and physicians and allied health professionals (AHPs) across Canada to inform the development of tools to support SDM in clinical appointments. The usability and acceptability of the tools were examined in one-to-one interviews. These findings were used to further refine the tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thematic analysis from five focus groups (<i>n</i> = 23) identified broad themes pertaining to barriers of SDM, factors influencing treatment decisions, and strategies to facilitate SDM. Insights were used to develop an Appointment Planner including pre-appointment questions and priority setting for PwH/caregivers and a Conversational Prompt Guide including considerations for clinicians. The findings of one-to-one interviews (<i>n</i> = 25) indicated good usability and acceptability and informed minor refinements to the tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study demonstrates the acceptability of specific tools to facilitate SDM based on qualitative research with the target populations. Initial feedback was positive. Further research is required to assess whether the tools can facilitate SDM by improving communication and strengthening relationships between PwH/caregivers and clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":"31 5","pages":"933-948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hae.70062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Engagement to Support Shared Decision Making Within Haemophilia: Development of Materials for People With Haemophilia, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals\",\"authors\":\"Laura Meade,&nbsp;Haowei (Linda) Sun,&nbsp;Robert J. Klaassen,&nbsp;Roxana Bahar,&nbsp;Shade Olatunde,&nbsp;Michelle Santos,&nbsp;Sheri vanGunst\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hae.70062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Treatment decision making can be complex and challenging for people with haemophilia (PwH) and their caregivers. A shared decision-making (SDM) approach can ensure that decisions about treatment and care incorporate patients’ beliefs, values, and preferences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aims were to: (1) identify potential drivers and barriers to SDM between PwH/caregivers and clinicians, (2) develop tools to facilitate SDM in clinic appointments, and (3) gain feedback on the usability and design of these tools to inform refinements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Virtual focus groups were conducted with adolescent and adult PwH, caregivers of children with haemophilia, and physicians and allied health professionals (AHPs) across Canada to inform the development of tools to support SDM in clinical appointments. The usability and acceptability of the tools were examined in one-to-one interviews. These findings were used to further refine the tools.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thematic analysis from five focus groups (<i>n</i> = 23) identified broad themes pertaining to barriers of SDM, factors influencing treatment decisions, and strategies to facilitate SDM. Insights were used to develop an Appointment Planner including pre-appointment questions and priority setting for PwH/caregivers and a Conversational Prompt Guide including considerations for clinicians. The findings of one-to-one interviews (<i>n</i> = 25) indicated good usability and acceptability and informed minor refinements to the tools.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study demonstrates the acceptability of specific tools to facilitate SDM based on qualitative research with the target populations. Initial feedback was positive. Further research is required to assess whether the tools can facilitate SDM by improving communication and strengthening relationships between PwH/caregivers and clinicians.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haemophilia\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"933-948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hae.70062\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haemophilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hae.70062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hae.70062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于血友病患者及其护理人员来说,治疗决策可能是复杂和具有挑战性的。共同决策(SDM)方法可以确保有关治疗和护理的决策纳入患者的信仰、价值观和偏好。目的:目的是:(1)确定PwH/护理人员和临床医生之间SDM的潜在驱动因素和障碍,(2)开发工具以促进门诊预约中的SDM,以及(3)获得关于这些工具的可用性和设计的反馈,以便为改进提供信息。方法:对加拿大各地的青少年和成人PwH、血友病儿童的照顾者、医生和联合卫生专业人员(ahp)进行虚拟焦点小组研究,以告知在临床预约中支持SDM的工具的开发。这些工具的可用性和可接受性在一对一的访谈中进行了检验。这些发现被用来进一步完善这些工具。结果:来自五个焦点小组(n = 23)的专题分析确定了与SDM的障碍、影响治疗决策的因素和促进SDM的策略有关的广泛主题。这些见解被用来开发一个预约计划,包括预约前的问题和PwH/护理人员的优先级设置,以及一个对话提示指南,包括临床医生的考虑。一对一访谈的结果(n = 25)表明了良好的可用性和可接受性,并告知了工具的细微改进。结论:本研究通过对目标人群的定性研究,证明了特定工具促进SDM的可接受性。最初的反馈是积极的。需要进一步的研究来评估这些工具是否可以通过改善PwH/护理人员和临床医生之间的沟通和加强关系来促进SDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhancing Engagement to Support Shared Decision Making Within Haemophilia: Development of Materials for People With Haemophilia, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals

Enhancing Engagement to Support Shared Decision Making Within Haemophilia: Development of Materials for People With Haemophilia, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals

Introduction

Treatment decision making can be complex and challenging for people with haemophilia (PwH) and their caregivers. A shared decision-making (SDM) approach can ensure that decisions about treatment and care incorporate patients’ beliefs, values, and preferences.

Aims

The aims were to: (1) identify potential drivers and barriers to SDM between PwH/caregivers and clinicians, (2) develop tools to facilitate SDM in clinic appointments, and (3) gain feedback on the usability and design of these tools to inform refinements.

Methods

Virtual focus groups were conducted with adolescent and adult PwH, caregivers of children with haemophilia, and physicians and allied health professionals (AHPs) across Canada to inform the development of tools to support SDM in clinical appointments. The usability and acceptability of the tools were examined in one-to-one interviews. These findings were used to further refine the tools.

Results

Thematic analysis from five focus groups (n = 23) identified broad themes pertaining to barriers of SDM, factors influencing treatment decisions, and strategies to facilitate SDM. Insights were used to develop an Appointment Planner including pre-appointment questions and priority setting for PwH/caregivers and a Conversational Prompt Guide including considerations for clinicians. The findings of one-to-one interviews (n = 25) indicated good usability and acceptability and informed minor refinements to the tools.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates the acceptability of specific tools to facilitate SDM based on qualitative research with the target populations. Initial feedback was positive. Further research is required to assess whether the tools can facilitate SDM by improving communication and strengthening relationships between PwH/caregivers and clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haemophilia
Haemophilia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
28.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include: clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies component therapy in the developing world transfusion transmitted disease haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics nursing laboratory diagnosis carrier detection psycho-social concerns economic issues audit inherited platelet disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信