依唑康唑和钙通道阻滞剂治疗侵袭性真菌病伴高血压:来自FAERS和PBPK/PD模型的证据

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jianxing Zhou, Bo Xiao, Zipeng Wei, Mengting Jia, Xin Luo, Huimin Wei, Xiaohan Zhang, Maobai Liu, Yifan Zhang, Xuemei Wu
{"title":"依唑康唑和钙通道阻滞剂治疗侵袭性真菌病伴高血压:来自FAERS和PBPK/PD模型的证据","authors":"Jianxing Zhou,&nbsp;Bo Xiao,&nbsp;Zipeng Wei,&nbsp;Mengting Jia,&nbsp;Xin Luo,&nbsp;Huimin Wei,&nbsp;Xiaohan Zhang,&nbsp;Maobai Liu,&nbsp;Yifan Zhang,&nbsp;Xuemei Wu","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD) frequently present with hypertension, necessitating polypharmacy and increasing the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). This study evaluated the safety of combining isavuconazole (ISA), a triazole antifungal drug (TAD), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive patients with IFD using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. FAERS data on hypertension and hypotension involving TADs from 2015 (first quarter) to 2023 (fourth quarter) were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methods. DDI models were developed and validated using the Simcyp simulator and in vitro experiments. Dose regimen evaluation and optimization were conducted using the established DDI model. ISA was not associated with hypertension or hypotension. Nifedipine and amlodipine were frequently associated with hypotension induced by CYP3A4 inhibition. The simulated regimens showed that ISA doubled plasma exposure to nifedipine immediate-release (IR) and controlled-release (CR) formulations, increased the maximum concentration by 1.51-fold for nifedipine IR and 2.15-fold for nifedipine CR, and caused a 3.5- to 4.09-fold increase in maximum systolic blood pressure reduction for nifedipine IR. The effects of amlodipine were negligible. Dose optimization, such as halving the nifedipine dose, effectively managed the overexposure. ISA appears safe for use in hypertensive patients with IFD when combined with CCBs, with minimal risk of significant DDIs. Personalized dosing adjustments can mitigate DDI risk. These findings support the clinical use of ISA to enhance dosing precision and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 8","pages":"1359-1369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isavuconazole and Calcium Channel Blocker for Invasive Fungal Disease Accompanied With Hypertension: Evidence From the FAERS and PBPK/PD Model\",\"authors\":\"Jianxing Zhou,&nbsp;Bo Xiao,&nbsp;Zipeng Wei,&nbsp;Mengting Jia,&nbsp;Xin Luo,&nbsp;Huimin Wei,&nbsp;Xiaohan Zhang,&nbsp;Maobai Liu,&nbsp;Yifan Zhang,&nbsp;Xuemei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD) frequently present with hypertension, necessitating polypharmacy and increasing the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). This study evaluated the safety of combining isavuconazole (ISA), a triazole antifungal drug (TAD), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive patients with IFD using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. FAERS data on hypertension and hypotension involving TADs from 2015 (first quarter) to 2023 (fourth quarter) were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methods. DDI models were developed and validated using the Simcyp simulator and in vitro experiments. Dose regimen evaluation and optimization were conducted using the established DDI model. ISA was not associated with hypertension or hypotension. Nifedipine and amlodipine were frequently associated with hypotension induced by CYP3A4 inhibition. The simulated regimens showed that ISA doubled plasma exposure to nifedipine immediate-release (IR) and controlled-release (CR) formulations, increased the maximum concentration by 1.51-fold for nifedipine IR and 2.15-fold for nifedipine CR, and caused a 3.5- to 4.09-fold increase in maximum systolic blood pressure reduction for nifedipine IR. The effects of amlodipine were negligible. Dose optimization, such as halving the nifedipine dose, effectively managed the overexposure. ISA appears safe for use in hypertensive patients with IFD when combined with CCBs, with minimal risk of significant DDIs. Personalized dosing adjustments can mitigate DDI risk. These findings support the clinical use of ISA to enhance dosing precision and patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"1359-1369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70056\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.70056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

侵袭性真菌病(IFD)患者经常伴有高血压,需要多种药物治疗,并增加了药物相互作用(ddi)的风险。本研究利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和基于生理的药代动力学/药效学模型,评估了isavuconazole (ISA)、三唑类抗真菌药物(TAD)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)联合治疗高血压合并IFD患者的安全性。使用2015年(第一季度)至2023年(第四季度)涉及TADs的高血压和低血压的FAERS数据。歧化分析采用报告优势比(ROR)和信息成分(IC)方法进行。利用Simcyp模拟器和体外实验建立DDI模型并进行验证。采用建立的DDI模型进行给药方案评价和优化。ISA与高血压或低血压无关。硝苯地平和氨氯地平常与CYP3A4抑制引起的低血压相关。模拟方案显示,ISA使硝苯地平速释(IR)和控释(CR)制剂的血浆暴露量增加了一倍,硝苯地平IR的最大浓度增加了1.51倍,硝苯地平CR的最大浓度增加了2.15倍,硝苯地平IR的最大收缩压降低量增加了3.5至4.09倍。氨氯地平的作用可以忽略不计。剂量优化,如硝苯地平剂量减半,有效地控制了过度暴露。ISA在合并CCBs的高血压IFD患者中使用是安全的,显著ddi的风险最小。个性化的剂量调整可以降低DDI风险。这些发现支持ISA的临床应用,以提高给药精度和患者安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Isavuconazole and Calcium Channel Blocker for Invasive Fungal Disease Accompanied With Hypertension: Evidence From the FAERS and PBPK/PD Model

Isavuconazole and Calcium Channel Blocker for Invasive Fungal Disease Accompanied With Hypertension: Evidence From the FAERS and PBPK/PD Model

Isavuconazole and Calcium Channel Blocker for Invasive Fungal Disease Accompanied With Hypertension: Evidence From the FAERS and PBPK/PD Model

Isavuconazole and Calcium Channel Blocker for Invasive Fungal Disease Accompanied With Hypertension: Evidence From the FAERS and PBPK/PD Model

Patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD) frequently present with hypertension, necessitating polypharmacy and increasing the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). This study evaluated the safety of combining isavuconazole (ISA), a triazole antifungal drug (TAD), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive patients with IFD using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. FAERS data on hypertension and hypotension involving TADs from 2015 (first quarter) to 2023 (fourth quarter) were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methods. DDI models were developed and validated using the Simcyp simulator and in vitro experiments. Dose regimen evaluation and optimization were conducted using the established DDI model. ISA was not associated with hypertension or hypotension. Nifedipine and amlodipine were frequently associated with hypotension induced by CYP3A4 inhibition. The simulated regimens showed that ISA doubled plasma exposure to nifedipine immediate-release (IR) and controlled-release (CR) formulations, increased the maximum concentration by 1.51-fold for nifedipine IR and 2.15-fold for nifedipine CR, and caused a 3.5- to 4.09-fold increase in maximum systolic blood pressure reduction for nifedipine IR. The effects of amlodipine were negligible. Dose optimization, such as halving the nifedipine dose, effectively managed the overexposure. ISA appears safe for use in hypertensive patients with IFD when combined with CCBs, with minimal risk of significant DDIs. Personalized dosing adjustments can mitigate DDI risk. These findings support the clinical use of ISA to enhance dosing precision and patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信