健康社会决定因素对物质使用障碍治疗结果影响的性别差异

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
C Leonardo Jimenez Chavez, MacKenzie R Peltier, Sherry A McKee
{"title":"健康社会决定因素对物质使用障碍治疗结果影响的性别差异","authors":"C Leonardo Jimenez Chavez, MacKenzie R Peltier, Sherry A McKee","doi":"10.1186/s13293-025-00734-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) and clinical severity factors are known to shape substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes, yet limited research has explored how these influences differ by sex. Understanding these differences is important to improving treatment equity and outcomes in publicly funded treatment systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from the 2018-2022 Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharges (TEDS-D), a national dataset of adults discharged from publicly funded SUD treatment programs. Sex-stratified binary logistic regressions were used to examine predictors of two outcomes: treatment non-completion and substance use at discharge. Predictors included SDOH (i.e., employment, education level, housing status, criminal justice involvement, prior treatment history, marital status, health insurance coverage and treatment duration) and indicators of SUD severity (e.g., age at first use, polysubstance use, and co-occurring psychiatric disorders).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both SDOH and clinical severity indicators were significantly associated with poorer treatment outcomes, with distinct patterns by sex. Women showed more consistent risk for poor treatment outcomes across predictors, including unemployment, psychiatric comorbidities, and polysubstance use, while lack of prior treatment history was the strongest predictor of substance use at discharge and dropout for men. Other predictors, such as housing instability, criminal justice involvement, and later-onset substance use, were also associated with increased risk of non-abstinence and dropout, with notable sex differences. Health insurance coverage was associated with better outcomes for both sexes, with the protective effect more consistent in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the need for sex-informed treatment approaches that address both social determinants of health and clinical complexity. Tailoring care to the unique risks and contexts of men and women may improve retention and reduce substance use at discharge, particularly in publicly funded systems. Highlights We examined social determinants of health (SDOH), and substance use disorder (SUD) severity-related predictors of substance use and treatment completion in a national sample of approximately 7 million adults. Women demonstrated more consistent vulnerability across predictors, including unemployment, co-occurring psychiatric disorders, and polysubstance use. For men, lack of prior treatment for SUD was the most consistent predictor for substance use at discharge and treatment dropout. Housing instability, access to healthcare, and financial barriers showed sex-specific effects, with women generally experiencing great risk of unsuccessful treatment. Findings highlight the importance of improving SUD care to address sex-specific risks and structural barriers, especially in publicly funded systems. Plain English Summary Substance use treatment is not a one-size-fits-all process. Recovery is shaped by both structural challenges, such as housing instability or limited access to care, and the clinical severity of substance use. These factors influence whether someone completes treatment and stays abstinent, and they often affect men and women in different ways. In this study, we analyzed data from approximately 7 million publicly funded substance use treatment episodes across the United States. We looked at how social determinants of health (e.g. employment status, education, housing, access to treatment) and clinical factors (e.g. age of substance use onset, psychiatric comorbidities and polysubstance use), were associated with two key outcomes: whether a person completed treatment and whether they reported use of their primary substance at the end of care. We found that women often faced greater challenges, especially regarding unemployment, co-occurring mental health conditions and using more than one type of substance. For men, being new to treatment was a strong predictor of poorer treatment success. These findings demonstrate the need for treatment programs to offer support that meets men and women where they are, considering the different barriers and challenges each group may face along the path to sustained recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8890,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sex Differences","volume":"16 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in the impact of social determinants of health on substance use disorder treatment outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"C Leonardo Jimenez Chavez, MacKenzie R Peltier, Sherry A McKee\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13293-025-00734-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) and clinical severity factors are known to shape substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes, yet limited research has explored how these influences differ by sex. Understanding these differences is important to improving treatment equity and outcomes in publicly funded treatment systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from the 2018-2022 Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharges (TEDS-D), a national dataset of adults discharged from publicly funded SUD treatment programs. Sex-stratified binary logistic regressions were used to examine predictors of two outcomes: treatment non-completion and substance use at discharge. Predictors included SDOH (i.e., employment, education level, housing status, criminal justice involvement, prior treatment history, marital status, health insurance coverage and treatment duration) and indicators of SUD severity (e.g., age at first use, polysubstance use, and co-occurring psychiatric disorders).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both SDOH and clinical severity indicators were significantly associated with poorer treatment outcomes, with distinct patterns by sex. Women showed more consistent risk for poor treatment outcomes across predictors, including unemployment, psychiatric comorbidities, and polysubstance use, while lack of prior treatment history was the strongest predictor of substance use at discharge and dropout for men. Other predictors, such as housing instability, criminal justice involvement, and later-onset substance use, were also associated with increased risk of non-abstinence and dropout, with notable sex differences. Health insurance coverage was associated with better outcomes for both sexes, with the protective effect more consistent in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the need for sex-informed treatment approaches that address both social determinants of health and clinical complexity. Tailoring care to the unique risks and contexts of men and women may improve retention and reduce substance use at discharge, particularly in publicly funded systems. Highlights We examined social determinants of health (SDOH), and substance use disorder (SUD) severity-related predictors of substance use and treatment completion in a national sample of approximately 7 million adults. Women demonstrated more consistent vulnerability across predictors, including unemployment, co-occurring psychiatric disorders, and polysubstance use. For men, lack of prior treatment for SUD was the most consistent predictor for substance use at discharge and treatment dropout. Housing instability, access to healthcare, and financial barriers showed sex-specific effects, with women generally experiencing great risk of unsuccessful treatment. Findings highlight the importance of improving SUD care to address sex-specific risks and structural barriers, especially in publicly funded systems. Plain English Summary Substance use treatment is not a one-size-fits-all process. Recovery is shaped by both structural challenges, such as housing instability or limited access to care, and the clinical severity of substance use. These factors influence whether someone completes treatment and stays abstinent, and they often affect men and women in different ways. In this study, we analyzed data from approximately 7 million publicly funded substance use treatment episodes across the United States. We looked at how social determinants of health (e.g. employment status, education, housing, access to treatment) and clinical factors (e.g. age of substance use onset, psychiatric comorbidities and polysubstance use), were associated with two key outcomes: whether a person completed treatment and whether they reported use of their primary substance at the end of care. We found that women often faced greater challenges, especially regarding unemployment, co-occurring mental health conditions and using more than one type of substance. For men, being new to treatment was a strong predictor of poorer treatment success. These findings demonstrate the need for treatment programs to offer support that meets men and women where they are, considering the different barriers and challenges each group may face along the path to sustained recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sex Differences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sex Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00734-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sex Differences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00734-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已知健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和临床严重程度因素会影响物质使用障碍(SUD)的治疗结果,但有限的研究探讨了这些影响如何因性别而异。了解这些差异对于改善公共资助治疗系统的治疗公平性和结果非常重要。方法:本研究分析了2018-2022年治疗事件数据集-出院(ted - d)的数据,这是一个由公共资助的SUD治疗项目出院的成年人的国家数据集。使用性别分层二元逻辑回归来检查两种结果的预测因子:治疗未完成和出院时的物质使用。预测因素包括SDOH(即就业、教育水平、住房状况、刑事司法参与、既往治疗史、婚姻状况、健康保险覆盖率和治疗持续时间)和SUD严重程度指标(如首次使用年龄、多物质使用和共存精神障碍)。结果:SDOH和临床严重程度指标均与较差的治疗结果显著相关,且性别差异明显。在各种预测因素中,包括失业、精神合并症和多种药物使用,女性表现出更一致的治疗结果不良风险,而缺乏既往治疗史是男性出院和辍学时药物使用的最强预测因素。其他预测因素,如住房不稳定、刑事司法介入和后发性药物使用,也与不禁欲和辍学的风险增加有关,性别差异显著。健康保险覆盖范围与两性更好的结果相关,对女性的保护效果更为一致。结论:这些发现强调了性别知情的治疗方法的必要性,以解决健康的社会决定因素和临床复杂性。根据男性和女性的独特风险和情况量身定制护理可能会改善保留率并减少出院时的药物使用,特别是在公共资助的系统中。我们在全国约700万成年人的样本中研究了健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和物质使用障碍(SUD)严重程度相关的物质使用和治疗完成预测因素。女性在失业、同时发生的精神疾病和多种物质使用等预测因素上表现出更一致的脆弱性。对于男性来说,缺乏先前的SUD治疗是出院和治疗退出时药物使用的最一致的预测因素。住房不稳定、获得医疗保健和经济障碍的影响表现出性别差异,妇女通常面临治疗失败的巨大风险。研究结果强调了改善SUD护理以解决性别风险和结构性障碍的重要性,特别是在公共资助的系统中。药物滥用治疗不是一个放之四海而皆准的过程。影响康复的是结构性挑战,如住房不稳定或获得护理的机会有限,以及药物使用的临床严重程度。这些因素会影响某人是否完成治疗并保持禁欲,而且它们通常以不同的方式影响男性和女性。在这项研究中,我们分析了来自美国大约700万公共资助的药物使用治疗事件的数据。我们研究了健康的社会决定因素(如就业状况、教育、住房、获得治疗)和临床因素(如开始使用药物的年龄、精神合并症和多种药物使用)如何与两个关键结果相关联:一个人是否完成了治疗,以及他们是否报告在治疗结束时使用了主要药物。我们发现,妇女往往面临更大的挑战,特别是在失业、同时出现的精神健康状况和使用一种以上物质方面。对于男性来说,刚开始接受治疗是治疗成功率较低的一个强有力的预测因素。这些发现表明,考虑到每个群体在持续康复的道路上可能面临的不同障碍和挑战,治疗方案需要提供满足男性和女性的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in the impact of social determinants of health on substance use disorder treatment outcomes.

Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) and clinical severity factors are known to shape substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes, yet limited research has explored how these influences differ by sex. Understanding these differences is important to improving treatment equity and outcomes in publicly funded treatment systems.

Methods: This study analyzed data from the 2018-2022 Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharges (TEDS-D), a national dataset of adults discharged from publicly funded SUD treatment programs. Sex-stratified binary logistic regressions were used to examine predictors of two outcomes: treatment non-completion and substance use at discharge. Predictors included SDOH (i.e., employment, education level, housing status, criminal justice involvement, prior treatment history, marital status, health insurance coverage and treatment duration) and indicators of SUD severity (e.g., age at first use, polysubstance use, and co-occurring psychiatric disorders).

Results: Both SDOH and clinical severity indicators were significantly associated with poorer treatment outcomes, with distinct patterns by sex. Women showed more consistent risk for poor treatment outcomes across predictors, including unemployment, psychiatric comorbidities, and polysubstance use, while lack of prior treatment history was the strongest predictor of substance use at discharge and dropout for men. Other predictors, such as housing instability, criminal justice involvement, and later-onset substance use, were also associated with increased risk of non-abstinence and dropout, with notable sex differences. Health insurance coverage was associated with better outcomes for both sexes, with the protective effect more consistent in women.

Conclusions: These findings emphasize the need for sex-informed treatment approaches that address both social determinants of health and clinical complexity. Tailoring care to the unique risks and contexts of men and women may improve retention and reduce substance use at discharge, particularly in publicly funded systems. Highlights We examined social determinants of health (SDOH), and substance use disorder (SUD) severity-related predictors of substance use and treatment completion in a national sample of approximately 7 million adults. Women demonstrated more consistent vulnerability across predictors, including unemployment, co-occurring psychiatric disorders, and polysubstance use. For men, lack of prior treatment for SUD was the most consistent predictor for substance use at discharge and treatment dropout. Housing instability, access to healthcare, and financial barriers showed sex-specific effects, with women generally experiencing great risk of unsuccessful treatment. Findings highlight the importance of improving SUD care to address sex-specific risks and structural barriers, especially in publicly funded systems. Plain English Summary Substance use treatment is not a one-size-fits-all process. Recovery is shaped by both structural challenges, such as housing instability or limited access to care, and the clinical severity of substance use. These factors influence whether someone completes treatment and stays abstinent, and they often affect men and women in different ways. In this study, we analyzed data from approximately 7 million publicly funded substance use treatment episodes across the United States. We looked at how social determinants of health (e.g. employment status, education, housing, access to treatment) and clinical factors (e.g. age of substance use onset, psychiatric comorbidities and polysubstance use), were associated with two key outcomes: whether a person completed treatment and whether they reported use of their primary substance at the end of care. We found that women often faced greater challenges, especially regarding unemployment, co-occurring mental health conditions and using more than one type of substance. For men, being new to treatment was a strong predictor of poorer treatment success. These findings demonstrate the need for treatment programs to offer support that meets men and women where they are, considering the different barriers and challenges each group may face along the path to sustained recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sex Differences
Biology of Sex Differences ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sex Differences is a unique scientific journal focusing on sex differences in physiology, behavior, and disease from molecular to phenotypic levels, incorporating both basic and clinical research. The journal aims to enhance understanding of basic principles and facilitate the development of therapeutic and diagnostic tools specific to sex differences. As an open-access journal, it is the official publication of the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences and co-published by the Society for Women's Health Research. Topical areas include, but are not limited to sex differences in: genomics; the microbiome; epigenetics; molecular and cell biology; tissue biology; physiology; interaction of tissue systems, in any system including adipose, behavioral, cardiovascular, immune, muscular, neural, renal, and skeletal; clinical studies bearing on sex differences in disease or response to therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信