Hanna Kadri Laas, Tuuli Metsvaht, Kadri Tamme, Juri Karjagin, Kristiina Naber, Artjom Afanasjev, Carmen Tiivel, Irja Lutsar, Hiie Soeorg
{"title":"基于亚组的模型选择改进万古霉素浓度的预测。","authors":"Hanna Kadri Laas, Tuuli Metsvaht, Kadri Tamme, Juri Karjagin, Kristiina Naber, Artjom Afanasjev, Carmen Tiivel, Irja Lutsar, Hiie Soeorg","doi":"10.1128/aac.00174-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individualized dosing of vancomycin is recommended, model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) being the preferred method to improve efficacy and limit toxicity. However, its implementation poses challenges, including model selection and initiation dose determination. We developed a model selection tool (MST) and evaluated its potential to improve concentration prediction precision and reduce bias. Retrospective data from adult intensive care unit patients receiving intravenous vancomycin were collected and divided into training and validation data sets. Population predictions from published one-compartment models were computed, and the universally best-performing model (UBM) was selected. A genetic algorithm was used to create an MST. The ability to forecast the third concentration based on previous concentrations was evaluated. A total of 148 vancomycin treatment episodes were included in training and 67 in the validation data set. The MST showed 12% and 6% improved precision compared to the UBM in training and validation data sets, respectively (mean absolute percentage prediction error [mean PAPE] 22.8% vs 26.0% and 28.4% vs 30.2%). The UBM exhibited lower bias in both training and validation data sets (mean percentage prediction error [mean PPE] 5.8% vs 4.7% and -2.8% vs -1.5%, respectively). The MST showed improved performance in predicting the third concentration based on previous concentrations. In both data sets, accuracy was the best/highest when two prior measured concentrations were used (mean PAPE and PPE 17.0% and -3.0% in training and 18.9% and -1.0% in validation data set). Overall, the MST has the potential to enhance vancomycin dosing accuracy from the first dose and simplify model selection, facilitating the utilization of MIPD in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0017425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subgroup-based model selection to improve the prediction of vancomycin concentrations.\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Kadri Laas, Tuuli Metsvaht, Kadri Tamme, Juri Karjagin, Kristiina Naber, Artjom Afanasjev, Carmen Tiivel, Irja Lutsar, Hiie Soeorg\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.00174-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individualized dosing of vancomycin is recommended, model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) being the preferred method to improve efficacy and limit toxicity. However, its implementation poses challenges, including model selection and initiation dose determination. We developed a model selection tool (MST) and evaluated its potential to improve concentration prediction precision and reduce bias. Retrospective data from adult intensive care unit patients receiving intravenous vancomycin were collected and divided into training and validation data sets. Population predictions from published one-compartment models were computed, and the universally best-performing model (UBM) was selected. A genetic algorithm was used to create an MST. The ability to forecast the third concentration based on previous concentrations was evaluated. A total of 148 vancomycin treatment episodes were included in training and 67 in the validation data set. The MST showed 12% and 6% improved precision compared to the UBM in training and validation data sets, respectively (mean absolute percentage prediction error [mean PAPE] 22.8% vs 26.0% and 28.4% vs 30.2%). The UBM exhibited lower bias in both training and validation data sets (mean percentage prediction error [mean PPE] 5.8% vs 4.7% and -2.8% vs -1.5%, respectively). The MST showed improved performance in predicting the third concentration based on previous concentrations. In both data sets, accuracy was the best/highest when two prior measured concentrations were used (mean PAPE and PPE 17.0% and -3.0% in training and 18.9% and -1.0% in validation data set). Overall, the MST has the potential to enhance vancomycin dosing accuracy from the first dose and simplify model selection, facilitating the utilization of MIPD in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0017425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00174-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00174-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subgroup-based model selection to improve the prediction of vancomycin concentrations.
Individualized dosing of vancomycin is recommended, model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) being the preferred method to improve efficacy and limit toxicity. However, its implementation poses challenges, including model selection and initiation dose determination. We developed a model selection tool (MST) and evaluated its potential to improve concentration prediction precision and reduce bias. Retrospective data from adult intensive care unit patients receiving intravenous vancomycin were collected and divided into training and validation data sets. Population predictions from published one-compartment models were computed, and the universally best-performing model (UBM) was selected. A genetic algorithm was used to create an MST. The ability to forecast the third concentration based on previous concentrations was evaluated. A total of 148 vancomycin treatment episodes were included in training and 67 in the validation data set. The MST showed 12% and 6% improved precision compared to the UBM in training and validation data sets, respectively (mean absolute percentage prediction error [mean PAPE] 22.8% vs 26.0% and 28.4% vs 30.2%). The UBM exhibited lower bias in both training and validation data sets (mean percentage prediction error [mean PPE] 5.8% vs 4.7% and -2.8% vs -1.5%, respectively). The MST showed improved performance in predicting the third concentration based on previous concentrations. In both data sets, accuracy was the best/highest when two prior measured concentrations were used (mean PAPE and PPE 17.0% and -3.0% in training and 18.9% and -1.0% in validation data set). Overall, the MST has the potential to enhance vancomycin dosing accuracy from the first dose and simplify model selection, facilitating the utilization of MIPD in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.