止血带的使用与初次全膝关节置换术后短期假体存活的关系:来自挪威关节置换术登记的24,249个膝关节的研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Michelle Khan, Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre, Mona Badawy, Otto Schnell Husby, Geir Hallan, Paul Johan Høl, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ove Furnes
{"title":"止血带的使用与初次全膝关节置换术后短期假体存活的关系:来自挪威关节置换术登记的24,249个膝关节的研究。","authors":"Michelle Khan, Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre, Mona Badawy, Otto Schnell Husby, Geir Hallan, Paul Johan Høl, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ove Furnes","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.43981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides a bloodless surgical field, which may lead to a better cementation but reduced function and increased pain. We aimed to investigate the effect of a tourniquet during TKA on implant survival, implant loosening, infection, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Data from 24,249 TKAs, collected by the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 2019 and 2023, was included. Among these, 14,926 were operated on with tourniquet and 9,323 without tourniquet. Cumulative revision rates (CRRs) were estimated using 1 minus Kaplan-Meier estimates for all revision causes and Cumulative Incidence Function (CIF) for specific revision causes at 3 years of follow-up. Cox regression analyses estimated hazard rate ratios (HRRs) for all revisions and Fine and Gray analyses estimated sub-hazard ratios (SHRs) for specific revision causes. Both were adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, ASA score, fixation, implant type, and tranexamic acid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> At 3 years of follow-up CRR was lower for the tourniquet group at 2.49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21-2.81) vs 3.59% (CI 3.14-4.10) for the non-tourniquet group. We found an increased risk of revision in the non-tourniquet group (HRR 1.81, CI 1.46-2.46) after 3 months. CIF demonstrated a lower CRR for aseptic tibial loosening for the tourniquet group (0.08%, CI 0.04-0.15) compared with the non-tourniquet group (0.39%, CI 0.25-0.58). There was a higher risk of aseptic tibial loosening for non-tourniquet TKAs (SHR 6.06, CI 3.06-12.00), but no association with aseptic femoral loosening. There was no difference in infection or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Tourniquet use during TKA was associated with reduced risk of tibial loosening after 3 years but without increased risk of infection, femoral loosening, or mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"547-554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of tourniquet use on short-term implant survival after primary total knee arthroplasty: a study of 24,249 knees from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Khan, Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre, Mona Badawy, Otto Schnell Husby, Geir Hallan, Paul Johan Høl, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ove Furnes\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.43981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides a bloodless surgical field, which may lead to a better cementation but reduced function and increased pain. We aimed to investigate the effect of a tourniquet during TKA on implant survival, implant loosening, infection, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Data from 24,249 TKAs, collected by the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 2019 and 2023, was included. Among these, 14,926 were operated on with tourniquet and 9,323 without tourniquet. Cumulative revision rates (CRRs) were estimated using 1 minus Kaplan-Meier estimates for all revision causes and Cumulative Incidence Function (CIF) for specific revision causes at 3 years of follow-up. Cox regression analyses estimated hazard rate ratios (HRRs) for all revisions and Fine and Gray analyses estimated sub-hazard ratios (SHRs) for specific revision causes. Both were adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, ASA score, fixation, implant type, and tranexamic acid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> At 3 years of follow-up CRR was lower for the tourniquet group at 2.49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21-2.81) vs 3.59% (CI 3.14-4.10) for the non-tourniquet group. We found an increased risk of revision in the non-tourniquet group (HRR 1.81, CI 1.46-2.46) after 3 months. CIF demonstrated a lower CRR for aseptic tibial loosening for the tourniquet group (0.08%, CI 0.04-0.15) compared with the non-tourniquet group (0.39%, CI 0.25-0.58). There was a higher risk of aseptic tibial loosening for non-tourniquet TKAs (SHR 6.06, CI 3.06-12.00), but no association with aseptic femoral loosening. There was no difference in infection or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Tourniquet use during TKA was associated with reduced risk of tibial loosening after 3 years but without increased risk of infection, femoral loosening, or mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"547-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285508/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:止血带在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的使用提供了一个无血的手术区域,这可能导致更好的骨水泥,但功能降低和疼痛增加。我们的目的是研究TKA期间止血带对假体存活、假体松动、感染和死亡率的影响。方法:纳入2019年至2023年挪威关节成形术登记处收集的24249例tka的数据。其中使用止血带手术14926例,不使用止血带手术9323例。累积修订率(CRRs)使用1 - Kaplan-Meier估计值对所有修订原因和累积发生率函数(CIF)对特定修订原因进行3年随访。Cox回归分析估计了所有修订的风险率比(HRRs), Fine和Gray分析估计了特定修订原因的亚风险比(SHRs)。根据年龄、性别、诊断、ASA评分、固定、植入物类型和氨甲环酸的使用进行调整。结果:随访3年时,止血带组的CRR较低,为2.49%(95%可信区间[CI] 2.21-2.81),而非止血带组为3.59% (CI 3.14-4.10)。我们发现,3个月后,非止血带组的翻修风险增加(HRR 1.81, CI 1.46-2.46)。CIF显示止血带组无菌性胫骨松动的CRR (0.08%, CI 0.04-0.15)低于非止血带组(0.39%,CI 0.25-0.58)。无止血带tka发生无菌性胫骨松动的风险较高(SHR为6.06,CI为3.06-12.00),但与无菌性股骨松动无关。感染和死亡率没有差异。结论:TKA期间止血带的使用与3年后胫骨松动的风险降低相关,但没有增加感染、股骨松动或死亡的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of tourniquet use on short-term implant survival after primary total knee arthroplasty: a study of 24,249 knees from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Association of tourniquet use on short-term implant survival after primary total knee arthroplasty: a study of 24,249 knees from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Association of tourniquet use on short-term implant survival after primary total knee arthroplasty: a study of 24,249 knees from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Association of tourniquet use on short-term implant survival after primary total knee arthroplasty: a study of 24,249 knees from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Background and purpose:  Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides a bloodless surgical field, which may lead to a better cementation but reduced function and increased pain. We aimed to investigate the effect of a tourniquet during TKA on implant survival, implant loosening, infection, and mortality.

Methods:  Data from 24,249 TKAs, collected by the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 2019 and 2023, was included. Among these, 14,926 were operated on with tourniquet and 9,323 without tourniquet. Cumulative revision rates (CRRs) were estimated using 1 minus Kaplan-Meier estimates for all revision causes and Cumulative Incidence Function (CIF) for specific revision causes at 3 years of follow-up. Cox regression analyses estimated hazard rate ratios (HRRs) for all revisions and Fine and Gray analyses estimated sub-hazard ratios (SHRs) for specific revision causes. Both were adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, ASA score, fixation, implant type, and tranexamic acid use.

Results:  At 3 years of follow-up CRR was lower for the tourniquet group at 2.49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21-2.81) vs 3.59% (CI 3.14-4.10) for the non-tourniquet group. We found an increased risk of revision in the non-tourniquet group (HRR 1.81, CI 1.46-2.46) after 3 months. CIF demonstrated a lower CRR for aseptic tibial loosening for the tourniquet group (0.08%, CI 0.04-0.15) compared with the non-tourniquet group (0.39%, CI 0.25-0.58). There was a higher risk of aseptic tibial loosening for non-tourniquet TKAs (SHR 6.06, CI 3.06-12.00), but no association with aseptic femoral loosening. There was no difference in infection or mortality.

Conclusion:  Tourniquet use during TKA was associated with reduced risk of tibial loosening after 3 years but without increased risk of infection, femoral loosening, or mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信