eDNA元条形码技术在传粉昆虫群落评价中的应用

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Stephanie S. Coster, Morgane Pommier, Nicholas J. Ruppel
{"title":"eDNA元条形码技术在传粉昆虫群落评价中的应用","authors":"Stephanie S. Coster,&nbsp;Morgane Pommier,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Ruppel","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pollinators play a critical role in ensuring the stability of food systems, yet their populations are in decline. To better understand and promote pollinator biodiversity, this study explored the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding techniques to assess plant–pollinator interactions. We conducted two experiments to optimize eDNA metabarcoding strategies for detecting pollinators on flowering plants. In the first experiment, we compared visual observations and eDNA detection via Illumina sequencing to characterize pollinator visitation on two native plant species in public and private green spaces across the Richmond, Virginia metropolitan area. Our findings revealed notable differences between the two methods, with visual surveys more sensitive to Hymenoptera and eDNA more sensitive to plant pests and other organisms. We devised a second experiment in a controlled environment at the Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden butterfly exhibit. Here, we tested different sampling strategies, primer pairs, and DNA sequencing platform (using Oxford Nanopore Technology). Despite detecting two butterfly species present in the exhibit, the eDNA metabarcoding showed limited sensitivity to the expected Lepidoptera. Our results indicate that while eDNA metabarcoding can detect a broader range of eukaryotic organisms, it may not be as effective for monitoring specific pollinator taxa like Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera. Factors such as sample type, primer bias, sequencing platform, and bioinformatics pipeline may impact detection outcomes. This study underscores the need for combining traditional monitoring techniques with eDNA metabarcoding to gain a comprehensive understanding of plant–pollinator interactions and improve pollinator conservation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Pollinator Community Assessment in a Field and Controlled Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie S. Coster,&nbsp;Morgane Pommier,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Ruppel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pollinators play a critical role in ensuring the stability of food systems, yet their populations are in decline. To better understand and promote pollinator biodiversity, this study explored the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding techniques to assess plant–pollinator interactions. We conducted two experiments to optimize eDNA metabarcoding strategies for detecting pollinators on flowering plants. In the first experiment, we compared visual observations and eDNA detection via Illumina sequencing to characterize pollinator visitation on two native plant species in public and private green spaces across the Richmond, Virginia metropolitan area. Our findings revealed notable differences between the two methods, with visual surveys more sensitive to Hymenoptera and eDNA more sensitive to plant pests and other organisms. We devised a second experiment in a controlled environment at the Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden butterfly exhibit. Here, we tested different sampling strategies, primer pairs, and DNA sequencing platform (using Oxford Nanopore Technology). Despite detecting two butterfly species present in the exhibit, the eDNA metabarcoding showed limited sensitivity to the expected Lepidoptera. Our results indicate that while eDNA metabarcoding can detect a broader range of eukaryotic organisms, it may not be as effective for monitoring specific pollinator taxa like Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera. Factors such as sample type, primer bias, sequencing platform, and bioinformatics pipeline may impact detection outcomes. This study underscores the need for combining traditional monitoring techniques with eDNA metabarcoding to gain a comprehensive understanding of plant–pollinator interactions and improve pollinator conservation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70162\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传粉媒介在确保粮食系统的稳定方面发挥着关键作用,但它们的数量正在减少。为了更好地了解和促进传粉媒介的生物多样性,本研究探索了利用环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码技术评估植物与传粉媒介的相互作用。我们进行了两个实验来优化eDNA元条形码策略,以检测开花植物的传粉者。在第一个实验中,我们比较了视觉观察和Illumina测序的eDNA检测,以表征弗吉尼亚州里士满市区公共和私人绿地上两种本地植物的传粉者访问。我们的研究结果显示了两种方法之间的显著差异,视觉调查对膜翅目昆虫更敏感,而eDNA对植物害虫和其他生物更敏感。我们在刘易斯·金特植物园蝴蝶展的一个受控环境中设计了第二个实验。在这里,我们测试了不同的采样策略、引物对和DNA测序平台(使用牛津纳米孔技术)。尽管在展览中发现了两种蝴蝶,但eDNA元条形码对预期的鳞翅目的敏感性有限。我们的研究结果表明,虽然eDNA元条形码可以检测更广泛的真核生物,但它可能不像膜翅目和鳞翅目那样有效地监测特定的传粉昆虫分类群。样品类型、引物偏倚、测序平台和生物信息学管道等因素可能影响检测结果。这项研究强调了将传统监测技术与eDNA元条形码技术相结合的必要性,以全面了解植物与传粉媒介的相互作用,并改善传粉媒介的保护工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Pollinator Community Assessment in a Field and Controlled Experiment

Evaluating eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Pollinator Community Assessment in a Field and Controlled Experiment

Pollinators play a critical role in ensuring the stability of food systems, yet their populations are in decline. To better understand and promote pollinator biodiversity, this study explored the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding techniques to assess plant–pollinator interactions. We conducted two experiments to optimize eDNA metabarcoding strategies for detecting pollinators on flowering plants. In the first experiment, we compared visual observations and eDNA detection via Illumina sequencing to characterize pollinator visitation on two native plant species in public and private green spaces across the Richmond, Virginia metropolitan area. Our findings revealed notable differences between the two methods, with visual surveys more sensitive to Hymenoptera and eDNA more sensitive to plant pests and other organisms. We devised a second experiment in a controlled environment at the Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden butterfly exhibit. Here, we tested different sampling strategies, primer pairs, and DNA sequencing platform (using Oxford Nanopore Technology). Despite detecting two butterfly species present in the exhibit, the eDNA metabarcoding showed limited sensitivity to the expected Lepidoptera. Our results indicate that while eDNA metabarcoding can detect a broader range of eukaryotic organisms, it may not be as effective for monitoring specific pollinator taxa like Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera. Factors such as sample type, primer bias, sequencing platform, and bioinformatics pipeline may impact detection outcomes. This study underscores the need for combining traditional monitoring techniques with eDNA metabarcoding to gain a comprehensive understanding of plant–pollinator interactions and improve pollinator conservation efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信