Belatacept早期类固醇停药试验(BEST)对临床结果的药代动力学分析,并与报道的获益和BENEFIT- ext药代动力学分析进行比较

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Alexandra Pyatt, Melissa McGowan, Ryota Tanaka, Bradley Miyagawa, Tomoyuki Mizuno, Adele Rike Shields, Annette Christianson, Patricia West-Thielke, John P. Leone, E. Steve Woodle, Dixon Kaufman, Alexander Wiseman, Arthur J. Matas, Alexander A. Vinks, Rita R. Alloway
{"title":"Belatacept早期类固醇停药试验(BEST)对临床结果的药代动力学分析,并与报道的获益和BENEFIT- ext药代动力学分析进行比较","authors":"Alexandra Pyatt,&nbsp;Melissa McGowan,&nbsp;Ryota Tanaka,&nbsp;Bradley Miyagawa,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Mizuno,&nbsp;Adele Rike Shields,&nbsp;Annette Christianson,&nbsp;Patricia West-Thielke,&nbsp;John P. Leone,&nbsp;E. Steve Woodle,&nbsp;Dixon Kaufman,&nbsp;Alexander Wiseman,&nbsp;Arthur J. Matas,&nbsp;Alexander A. Vinks,&nbsp;Rita R. Alloway","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Belatacept (BELA) pharmacokinetic (PK) studies informed dosing strategies used in phase 3 studies, where fixed mg/kg dosing compared a less intensive (LI) and more intensive (MI) regimen. The LI regimen was preferred due to a better risk/benefit profile. We compared PK parameters observed in the BELA Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) with previous reports. BELA trough samples were analyzed using a validated quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay. Clearance (CL) was estimated with Bayesian estimation using a published BELA population PK model. Significantly higher CL was observed in subjects &lt;60 years old and African American (AA) patients, leading to decreased BELA exposure. No differences in allometrically scaled CL were observed by BMI or sex; however, overall BELA exposure was greater in males. There were no differences in exposure in subjects with rejection; however, subjects with infection had significantly higher exposure. BELA PK was not different between alemtuzumab and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin induction groups without steroids, but overall drug exposure was higher than previously reported in trials co-administering with basiliximab and steroids. Future studies to optimize BELA dosing strategies are warranted as BELA exposure in this analysis exceeded Phase 3 target thresholds.</p><p><b>Trial Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01729494</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70172","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Pyatt,&nbsp;Melissa McGowan,&nbsp;Ryota Tanaka,&nbsp;Bradley Miyagawa,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Mizuno,&nbsp;Adele Rike Shields,&nbsp;Annette Christianson,&nbsp;Patricia West-Thielke,&nbsp;John P. Leone,&nbsp;E. Steve Woodle,&nbsp;Dixon Kaufman,&nbsp;Alexander Wiseman,&nbsp;Arthur J. Matas,&nbsp;Alexander A. Vinks,&nbsp;Rita R. Alloway\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Belatacept (BELA) pharmacokinetic (PK) studies informed dosing strategies used in phase 3 studies, where fixed mg/kg dosing compared a less intensive (LI) and more intensive (MI) regimen. The LI regimen was preferred due to a better risk/benefit profile. We compared PK parameters observed in the BELA Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) with previous reports. BELA trough samples were analyzed using a validated quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay. Clearance (CL) was estimated with Bayesian estimation using a published BELA population PK model. Significantly higher CL was observed in subjects &lt;60 years old and African American (AA) patients, leading to decreased BELA exposure. No differences in allometrically scaled CL were observed by BMI or sex; however, overall BELA exposure was greater in males. There were no differences in exposure in subjects with rejection; however, subjects with infection had significantly higher exposure. BELA PK was not different between alemtuzumab and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin induction groups without steroids, but overall drug exposure was higher than previously reported in trials co-administering with basiliximab and steroids. Future studies to optimize BELA dosing strategies are warranted as BELA exposure in this analysis exceeded Phase 3 target thresholds.</p><p><b>Trial Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01729494</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70172\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Belatacept (BELA)药代动力学(PK)研究为3期研究中使用的给药策略提供了信息,其中固定mg/kg的给药剂量比较了低强度(LI)和高强度(MI)的给药方案。LI方案由于具有更好的风险/收益概况而被首选。我们比较了在BELA早期类固醇停药试验(BEST)中观察到的PK参数与之前的报道。使用经过验证的定量酶联免疫分析法分析BELA谷样品。清除率(CL)采用贝叶斯估计,使用已发表的BELA种群PK模型。在60岁受试者和非裔美国人(AA)患者中观察到明显较高的CL,导致BELA暴露减少。在异速缩放CL中,BMI和性别没有差异;然而,总体而言,男性的BELA暴露量更高。被拒绝者的暴露程度没有差异;然而,受感染的受试者的接触量明显更高。在没有类固醇的阿仑单抗组和兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白诱导组之间BELA PK没有差异,但总体药物暴露高于先前报道的与巴利昔单抗和类固醇联合使用的试验。由于本分析中贝拉a暴露量超过了3期目标阈值,因此有必要进行优化贝拉a给药策略的未来研究。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT 01729494
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Belatacept (BELA) pharmacokinetic (PK) studies informed dosing strategies used in phase 3 studies, where fixed mg/kg dosing compared a less intensive (LI) and more intensive (MI) regimen. The LI regimen was preferred due to a better risk/benefit profile. We compared PK parameters observed in the BELA Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) with previous reports. BELA trough samples were analyzed using a validated quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay. Clearance (CL) was estimated with Bayesian estimation using a published BELA population PK model. Significantly higher CL was observed in subjects <60 years old and African American (AA) patients, leading to decreased BELA exposure. No differences in allometrically scaled CL were observed by BMI or sex; however, overall BELA exposure was greater in males. There were no differences in exposure in subjects with rejection; however, subjects with infection had significantly higher exposure. BELA PK was not different between alemtuzumab and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin induction groups without steroids, but overall drug exposure was higher than previously reported in trials co-administering with basiliximab and steroids. Future studies to optimize BELA dosing strategies are warranted as BELA exposure in this analysis exceeded Phase 3 target thresholds.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01729494

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信