模拟平台训练和评估儿科急症护理程序技能:范围审查

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Shayan Novin, Tehrim Younas, Jessie Xu, Samuel Graef, Nima Karimi, Maggie Xu, Jo-Anne Petropoulos, Quang Ngo, Elif Bilgic
{"title":"模拟平台训练和评估儿科急症护理程序技能:范围审查","authors":"Shayan Novin,&nbsp;Tehrim Younas,&nbsp;Jessie Xu,&nbsp;Samuel Graef,&nbsp;Nima Karimi,&nbsp;Maggie Xu,&nbsp;Jo-Anne Petropoulos,&nbsp;Quang Ngo,&nbsp;Elif Bilgic","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Medical trainees have limited opportunities to practice certain pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) procedures in the clinical setting. Simulation-based education provides an opportunity for trainees to improve their technical and non-technical skills. This scoping review aimed to explore the ways in which simulation has been used to train and assess medical learners.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A search was conducted from 2011 to August 2022 using MEDLINE, OVID Embase, OVID Emcare, and Cochrane Trials, among others. The review included empirical studies that used simulation for training medical trainees in four essential pediatric procedures: intubation, lumbar puncture, intraosseous insertion, and chest tube insertion. Six reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were recorded, stored, and summarized in a standardized spreadsheet.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The search retrieved 4073 articles, of which 207 underwent full-text screening. Data were extracted from 107 studies. Among these, 69 studies focused exclusively on intubation skills, 19 studies on lumbar puncture, 10 studies on intraosseous insertion, and two studies on chest tube insertion. The majority of studies (<i>n</i> = 61) involved residents, while 15 studies focused on medical students. Training platforms included mannequins (<i>n</i> = 84), ex-vivo models (<i>n</i> = 6), task trainers (<i>n</i> = 4), and standardized patients (<i>n</i> = 1). Competency was largely assessed using an assessment tool (<i>n</i> = 45) as the sole assessment method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation-based training and assessment can support medical learners in developing key technical and non-technical skills related to PEM procedures. However, there is a need for diversification of simulation platforms used, expansion of procedures targeted in simulation-based training and assessment programs, and creation of standardized and procedure-specific assessments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation Platforms to Train and Assess Pediatric Acute Care Procedural Skills: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Shayan Novin,&nbsp;Tehrim Younas,&nbsp;Jessie Xu,&nbsp;Samuel Graef,&nbsp;Nima Karimi,&nbsp;Maggie Xu,&nbsp;Jo-Anne Petropoulos,&nbsp;Quang Ngo,&nbsp;Elif Bilgic\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medical trainees have limited opportunities to practice certain pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) procedures in the clinical setting. Simulation-based education provides an opportunity for trainees to improve their technical and non-technical skills. This scoping review aimed to explore the ways in which simulation has been used to train and assess medical learners.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A search was conducted from 2011 to August 2022 using MEDLINE, OVID Embase, OVID Emcare, and Cochrane Trials, among others. The review included empirical studies that used simulation for training medical trainees in four essential pediatric procedures: intubation, lumbar puncture, intraosseous insertion, and chest tube insertion. Six reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were recorded, stored, and summarized in a standardized spreadsheet.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The search retrieved 4073 articles, of which 207 underwent full-text screening. Data were extracted from 107 studies. Among these, 69 studies focused exclusively on intubation skills, 19 studies on lumbar puncture, 10 studies on intraosseous insertion, and two studies on chest tube insertion. The majority of studies (<i>n</i> = 61) involved residents, while 15 studies focused on medical students. Training platforms included mannequins (<i>n</i> = 84), ex-vivo models (<i>n</i> = 6), task trainers (<i>n</i> = 4), and standardized patients (<i>n</i> = 1). Competency was largely assessed using an assessment tool (<i>n</i> = 45) as the sole assessment method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Simulation-based training and assessment can support medical learners in developing key technical and non-technical skills related to PEM procedures. However, there is a need for diversification of simulation platforms used, expansion of procedures targeted in simulation-based training and assessment programs, and creation of standardized and procedure-specific assessments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70083\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学培训生在临床环境中实践某些儿科急诊医学(PEM)程序的机会有限。基于模拟的教育为受训者提供了提高技术和非技术技能的机会。这一范围审查旨在探讨的方式,其中模拟已被用于培训和评估医学学习者。方法检索自2011年至2022年8月的MEDLINE、OVID Embase、OVID Emcare和Cochrane Trials等。这篇综述包括了一些实证研究,这些研究使用模拟技术对医学实习生进行四项基本儿科手术的培训:插管、腰椎穿刺、骨内插入和胸管插入。六名审稿人独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。数据被记录、存储并汇总在一个标准化的电子表格中。结果共检索到4073篇文章,其中207篇进行了全文筛选。数据来自107项研究。其中专门研究插管技巧的研究69项,腰椎穿刺19项,骨内插入10项,胸管插入2项。大多数研究(n = 61)涉及住院医生,而15项研究关注医科学生。训练平台包括人体模型(n = 84)、离体模型(n = 6)、任务训练器(n = 4)和标准化患者(n = 1)。能力评估主要使用评估工具(n = 45)作为唯一的评估方法。结论基于模拟的培训和评估可以帮助医学学习者发展与PEM程序相关的关键技术和非技术技能。然而,需要使用多样化的模拟平台,扩展基于模拟的培训和评估计划的程序,并创建标准化和特定程序的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Simulation Platforms to Train and Assess Pediatric Acute Care Procedural Skills: A Scoping Review

Simulation Platforms to Train and Assess Pediatric Acute Care Procedural Skills: A Scoping Review

Background

Medical trainees have limited opportunities to practice certain pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) procedures in the clinical setting. Simulation-based education provides an opportunity for trainees to improve their technical and non-technical skills. This scoping review aimed to explore the ways in which simulation has been used to train and assess medical learners.

Methods

A search was conducted from 2011 to August 2022 using MEDLINE, OVID Embase, OVID Emcare, and Cochrane Trials, among others. The review included empirical studies that used simulation for training medical trainees in four essential pediatric procedures: intubation, lumbar puncture, intraosseous insertion, and chest tube insertion. Six reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were recorded, stored, and summarized in a standardized spreadsheet.

Results

The search retrieved 4073 articles, of which 207 underwent full-text screening. Data were extracted from 107 studies. Among these, 69 studies focused exclusively on intubation skills, 19 studies on lumbar puncture, 10 studies on intraosseous insertion, and two studies on chest tube insertion. The majority of studies (n = 61) involved residents, while 15 studies focused on medical students. Training platforms included mannequins (n = 84), ex-vivo models (n = 6), task trainers (n = 4), and standardized patients (n = 1). Competency was largely assessed using an assessment tool (n = 45) as the sole assessment method.

Conclusions

Simulation-based training and assessment can support medical learners in developing key technical and non-technical skills related to PEM procedures. However, there is a need for diversification of simulation platforms used, expansion of procedures targeted in simulation-based training and assessment programs, and creation of standardized and procedure-specific assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信