实施结构化研究计划前后的居民学术活动和生产力结果:前后研究

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sydney Krispin, Eric Kontowicz, Brett Faine, Michael Takacs, Karisa K. Harland, J. Priyanka Vakkalanka, Kelli Wallace, Andrew Nugent, Nicholas M. Mohr
{"title":"实施结构化研究计划前后的居民学术活动和生产力结果:前后研究","authors":"Sydney Krispin,&nbsp;Eric Kontowicz,&nbsp;Brett Faine,&nbsp;Michael Takacs,&nbsp;Karisa K. Harland,&nbsp;J. Priyanka Vakkalanka,&nbsp;Kelli Wallace,&nbsp;Andrew Nugent,&nbsp;Nicholas M. Mohr","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs require participation in scholarly activity. In 2017, we launched a formal Resident Research Program (RRP) for physician residents in our 3-year accredited residency program. We aimed to measure the association between the implementation of the RRP and resident scholarly productivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This analysis was a before-after study of residents in a Midwestern university-based EM residency program (7–10 per class) graduating between 2013 and 2023. The RRP was implemented in July 2017 and offered resources and requirements; our study compared outcomes before and after the launch of the program. We provided a dedicated training program study coordinator, 24-h in-house research assistants, faculty/research staff mentorship, and research funding. Residents were required to complete a hypothesis-driven research project and submit an abstract to a professional meeting or manuscript for publication. We tracked scholarly productivity per class, including publications, presentations, first-author manuscripts, and faculty publications with a resident. We measured the association between the RRP and scholarly productivity through univariate Poisson regression models to report the unadjusted rate ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety residents were included (<i>n</i> = 43 after RRP launch). Annual mean resident scholarly productivity increased post-intervention for publications (10.4 vs. 6.2 publications per class, RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.09–2.59), presentations (7.4 vs. 3.7 abstracts per class, RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.19–3.42), and first-author publications (5.8 vs. 2.2 publications per class, RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.40–5.09). No significant change in faculty co-authors was observed (12.8 vs. 9.5, RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.95–1.92).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The implementation of a structured RRP was associated with increased resident scholarly productivity. The targeted research resources served as both a strategy to support resident research and enhance departmental academic engagement. Future research should examine the perceptions, quality, and impact of scholarly activity requirements on residents.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resident Scholarly Activity and Productivity Outcomes Before and After Implementing a Structured Research Program: A Before–After Study\",\"authors\":\"Sydney Krispin,&nbsp;Eric Kontowicz,&nbsp;Brett Faine,&nbsp;Michael Takacs,&nbsp;Karisa K. Harland,&nbsp;J. Priyanka Vakkalanka,&nbsp;Kelli Wallace,&nbsp;Andrew Nugent,&nbsp;Nicholas M. Mohr\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs require participation in scholarly activity. In 2017, we launched a formal Resident Research Program (RRP) for physician residents in our 3-year accredited residency program. We aimed to measure the association between the implementation of the RRP and resident scholarly productivity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This analysis was a before-after study of residents in a Midwestern university-based EM residency program (7–10 per class) graduating between 2013 and 2023. The RRP was implemented in July 2017 and offered resources and requirements; our study compared outcomes before and after the launch of the program. We provided a dedicated training program study coordinator, 24-h in-house research assistants, faculty/research staff mentorship, and research funding. Residents were required to complete a hypothesis-driven research project and submit an abstract to a professional meeting or manuscript for publication. We tracked scholarly productivity per class, including publications, presentations, first-author manuscripts, and faculty publications with a resident. We measured the association between the RRP and scholarly productivity through univariate Poisson regression models to report the unadjusted rate ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety residents were included (<i>n</i> = 43 after RRP launch). Annual mean resident scholarly productivity increased post-intervention for publications (10.4 vs. 6.2 publications per class, RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.09–2.59), presentations (7.4 vs. 3.7 abstracts per class, RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.19–3.42), and first-author publications (5.8 vs. 2.2 publications per class, RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.40–5.09). No significant change in faculty co-authors was observed (12.8 vs. 9.5, RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.95–1.92).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The implementation of a structured RRP was associated with increased resident scholarly productivity. The targeted research resources served as both a strategy to support resident research and enhance departmental academic engagement. Future research should examine the perceptions, quality, and impact of scholarly activity requirements on residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70082\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的急诊医学(EM)住院医师项目需要参与学术活动。2017年,我们为住院医师推出了正式的住院医师研究计划(RRP),该计划为期3年。我们的目的是衡量RRP的实施与居民学术生产力之间的关系。方法对2013年至2023年毕业的中西部大学EM住院医师项目(每班7-10人)的住院医师进行了前后研究。RRP于2017年7月实施,并提供了资源和要求;我们的研究比较了项目启动前后的结果。我们提供了专门的培训项目研究协调员,24小时内部研究助理,教师/研究人员指导和研究资金。居民被要求完成一个假设驱动的研究项目,并向专业会议提交摘要或手稿发表。我们跟踪每堂课的学术生产力,包括出版物、演讲、第一作者手稿和一位住院医师的教员出版物。我们通过单变量泊松回归模型测量RRP与学术生产力之间的关联,以95%置信区间(95% CI)报告未调整率比(RR)。结果RRP启动后共纳入90名居民(n = 43)。干预后,发表文章(每类10.4篇对6.2篇,RR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.09-2.59)、报告(每类7.4篇对3.7篇摘要,RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.19-3.42)和第一作者发表文章(每类5.8篇对2.2篇,RR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.40-5.09)的年平均学术生产力均有所提高。教职工共同作者未见显著变化(12.8 vs. 9.5, RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.95-1.92)。结论:结构化RRP的实施与住院医师学术生产力的提高有关。有针对性的研究资源既是支持居民研究的战略,也是加强部门学术参与的战略。未来的研究应该考察居民对学术活动要求的看法、质量和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Resident Scholarly Activity and Productivity Outcomes Before and After Implementing a Structured Research Program: A Before–After Study

Resident Scholarly Activity and Productivity Outcomes Before and After Implementing a Structured Research Program: A Before–After Study

Objectives

Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs require participation in scholarly activity. In 2017, we launched a formal Resident Research Program (RRP) for physician residents in our 3-year accredited residency program. We aimed to measure the association between the implementation of the RRP and resident scholarly productivity.

Methods

This analysis was a before-after study of residents in a Midwestern university-based EM residency program (7–10 per class) graduating between 2013 and 2023. The RRP was implemented in July 2017 and offered resources and requirements; our study compared outcomes before and after the launch of the program. We provided a dedicated training program study coordinator, 24-h in-house research assistants, faculty/research staff mentorship, and research funding. Residents were required to complete a hypothesis-driven research project and submit an abstract to a professional meeting or manuscript for publication. We tracked scholarly productivity per class, including publications, presentations, first-author manuscripts, and faculty publications with a resident. We measured the association between the RRP and scholarly productivity through univariate Poisson regression models to report the unadjusted rate ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

Ninety residents were included (n = 43 after RRP launch). Annual mean resident scholarly productivity increased post-intervention for publications (10.4 vs. 6.2 publications per class, RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.09–2.59), presentations (7.4 vs. 3.7 abstracts per class, RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.19–3.42), and first-author publications (5.8 vs. 2.2 publications per class, RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.40–5.09). No significant change in faculty co-authors was observed (12.8 vs. 9.5, RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.95–1.92).

Conclusions

The implementation of a structured RRP was associated with increased resident scholarly productivity. The targeted research resources served as both a strategy to support resident research and enhance departmental academic engagement. Future research should examine the perceptions, quality, and impact of scholarly activity requirements on residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信