Jim Samuel;Tanya Khanna;Julia Esguerra;Srinivasaraghavan Sundar;Alexander Pelaez;Soumitra S. Bhuyan
{"title":"人工智能恐惧症的兴起!利用ML、NLP和llm揭示AI恐惧情绪的新闻驱动传播","authors":"Jim Samuel;Tanya Khanna;Julia Esguerra;Srinivasaraghavan Sundar;Alexander Pelaez;Soumitra S. Bhuyan","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3588179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary public discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) often displays disproportionate fear and confusion relative to AI’s actual potential. This study examines how the use of alarmist and fear-inducing language by news media contributes to negative public perceptions of AI. Nearly 70,000 AI-related news headlines were analyzed using natural language processing (NLP), machine learning (ML), and large language models (LLMs) to identify dominant themes and sentiment patterns. The theoretical framework draws on existing literature that posits the power of fear-inducing headlines to influence public perception and behavior, even when such headlines represent a relatively small proportion of total coverage. This research applies topic modeling and fear sentiment classification using BERT, LLaMA, and Mistral, alongside supervised ML techniques. The findings show a persistent presence of emotionally negative and fear-laden language in AI news coverage. This portrayal of AI as dangerous to humans or as an existential threat profoundly shapes public perception, fueling AI phobia that leads to behavioral resistance toward AI, which is ultimately detrimental to the science of AI. Furthermore, this can have an adverse impact on AI policies and regulations, leading to a stunted growth environment for AI. The study concludes with implications and recommendations to counter fear-driven narratives and suggests ways to improve public understanding of AI through responsible news media coverage, broad AI education, democratization of AI resources, and the drawing of clear distinctions between AI as a science versus commercial AI applications, to promote enhanced fact-based mass engagement with AI while preserving human dignity and agency.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"125944-125969"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11079577","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rise of Artificial Intelligence Phobia! Unveiling News-Driven Spread of AI Fear Sentiment Using ML, NLP, and LLMs\",\"authors\":\"Jim Samuel;Tanya Khanna;Julia Esguerra;Srinivasaraghavan Sundar;Alexander Pelaez;Soumitra S. Bhuyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3588179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary public discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) often displays disproportionate fear and confusion relative to AI’s actual potential. This study examines how the use of alarmist and fear-inducing language by news media contributes to negative public perceptions of AI. Nearly 70,000 AI-related news headlines were analyzed using natural language processing (NLP), machine learning (ML), and large language models (LLMs) to identify dominant themes and sentiment patterns. The theoretical framework draws on existing literature that posits the power of fear-inducing headlines to influence public perception and behavior, even when such headlines represent a relatively small proportion of total coverage. This research applies topic modeling and fear sentiment classification using BERT, LLaMA, and Mistral, alongside supervised ML techniques. The findings show a persistent presence of emotionally negative and fear-laden language in AI news coverage. This portrayal of AI as dangerous to humans or as an existential threat profoundly shapes public perception, fueling AI phobia that leads to behavioral resistance toward AI, which is ultimately detrimental to the science of AI. Furthermore, this can have an adverse impact on AI policies and regulations, leading to a stunted growth environment for AI. The study concludes with implications and recommendations to counter fear-driven narratives and suggests ways to improve public understanding of AI through responsible news media coverage, broad AI education, democratization of AI resources, and the drawing of clear distinctions between AI as a science versus commercial AI applications, to promote enhanced fact-based mass engagement with AI while preserving human dignity and agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Access\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"125944-125969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11079577\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11079577/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11079577/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Rise of Artificial Intelligence Phobia! Unveiling News-Driven Spread of AI Fear Sentiment Using ML, NLP, and LLMs
Contemporary public discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) often displays disproportionate fear and confusion relative to AI’s actual potential. This study examines how the use of alarmist and fear-inducing language by news media contributes to negative public perceptions of AI. Nearly 70,000 AI-related news headlines were analyzed using natural language processing (NLP), machine learning (ML), and large language models (LLMs) to identify dominant themes and sentiment patterns. The theoretical framework draws on existing literature that posits the power of fear-inducing headlines to influence public perception and behavior, even when such headlines represent a relatively small proportion of total coverage. This research applies topic modeling and fear sentiment classification using BERT, LLaMA, and Mistral, alongside supervised ML techniques. The findings show a persistent presence of emotionally negative and fear-laden language in AI news coverage. This portrayal of AI as dangerous to humans or as an existential threat profoundly shapes public perception, fueling AI phobia that leads to behavioral resistance toward AI, which is ultimately detrimental to the science of AI. Furthermore, this can have an adverse impact on AI policies and regulations, leading to a stunted growth environment for AI. The study concludes with implications and recommendations to counter fear-driven narratives and suggests ways to improve public understanding of AI through responsible news media coverage, broad AI education, democratization of AI resources, and the drawing of clear distinctions between AI as a science versus commercial AI applications, to promote enhanced fact-based mass engagement with AI while preserving human dignity and agency.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.