Douglas R. Krafft , Jonathan M. Waddell , Karen G. Keil , Brett A. Hayhurst , Brian C. McFall , James P. Selegean
{"title":"浊度与疏浚泥沙在俄亥俄州费尔波特港动态沿岸带的有利位置有关","authors":"Douglas R. Krafft , Jonathan M. Waddell , Karen G. Keil , Brett A. Hayhurst , Brian C. McFall , James P. Selegean","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2025.102533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The nearshore placement of sediments dredged via maintenance of navigation channels is a cost-effective management solution which offers myriad benefits that can include shoreline protection and habitat restoration. Benefits can be offset by concerns due to potential effects on the ecosystem from turbidity generated during placement. This study investigates the turbidity and geomorphic response of dredged sediment placed within the dynamic littoral zone of Lake Erie. Turbidity was measured at nine locations before, during, and after nearshore dredged material placement, and bathymetry was measured in four surveys to capture the effects of placing 39,400 m<sup>3</sup> of material from Fairport Harbor, Ohio. Nearshore turbidity measurements collected before dredging occurred could be explained using wave data, which provided an estimate for expected background turbidity during and after dredging. These wave models continued to fit measured turbidity data well during and after dredged material placement and indicate sediment placement did not significantly increase turbidity at any of the monitoring locations. Bathymetry surveys indicate sediment was placed within the active littoral zone and may have contributed to accretion along the onshore edge of the pre-existing bar. These observations indicate that nearshore placement of dredged material in this environment is aligned with natural sediment movement in the littoral zone, with minimal to negligible generation of turbidity beyond what occurs naturally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turbidity associated with the beneficial placement of dredged sediment in the dynamic littoral zone at Fairport Harbor, Ohio\",\"authors\":\"Douglas R. Krafft , Jonathan M. Waddell , Karen G. Keil , Brett A. Hayhurst , Brian C. McFall , James P. Selegean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jglr.2025.102533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The nearshore placement of sediments dredged via maintenance of navigation channels is a cost-effective management solution which offers myriad benefits that can include shoreline protection and habitat restoration. Benefits can be offset by concerns due to potential effects on the ecosystem from turbidity generated during placement. This study investigates the turbidity and geomorphic response of dredged sediment placed within the dynamic littoral zone of Lake Erie. Turbidity was measured at nine locations before, during, and after nearshore dredged material placement, and bathymetry was measured in four surveys to capture the effects of placing 39,400 m<sup>3</sup> of material from Fairport Harbor, Ohio. Nearshore turbidity measurements collected before dredging occurred could be explained using wave data, which provided an estimate for expected background turbidity during and after dredging. These wave models continued to fit measured turbidity data well during and after dredged material placement and indicate sediment placement did not significantly increase turbidity at any of the monitoring locations. Bathymetry surveys indicate sediment was placed within the active littoral zone and may have contributed to accretion along the onshore edge of the pre-existing bar. These observations indicate that nearshore placement of dredged material in this environment is aligned with natural sediment movement in the littoral zone, with minimal to negligible generation of turbidity beyond what occurs naturally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133025000279\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133025000279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Turbidity associated with the beneficial placement of dredged sediment in the dynamic littoral zone at Fairport Harbor, Ohio
The nearshore placement of sediments dredged via maintenance of navigation channels is a cost-effective management solution which offers myriad benefits that can include shoreline protection and habitat restoration. Benefits can be offset by concerns due to potential effects on the ecosystem from turbidity generated during placement. This study investigates the turbidity and geomorphic response of dredged sediment placed within the dynamic littoral zone of Lake Erie. Turbidity was measured at nine locations before, during, and after nearshore dredged material placement, and bathymetry was measured in four surveys to capture the effects of placing 39,400 m3 of material from Fairport Harbor, Ohio. Nearshore turbidity measurements collected before dredging occurred could be explained using wave data, which provided an estimate for expected background turbidity during and after dredging. These wave models continued to fit measured turbidity data well during and after dredged material placement and indicate sediment placement did not significantly increase turbidity at any of the monitoring locations. Bathymetry surveys indicate sediment was placed within the active littoral zone and may have contributed to accretion along the onshore edge of the pre-existing bar. These observations indicate that nearshore placement of dredged material in this environment is aligned with natural sediment movement in the littoral zone, with minimal to negligible generation of turbidity beyond what occurs naturally.
期刊介绍:
Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.