早期高流量鼻氧对胸外科手术后膈功能和肺部并发症的影响:一项随机临床试验

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alberto Fogagnolo MD , Salvatore Grasso (Professor) , Martin Dres (Professor) , Danila Azzolina Professor, PhD , Francesca Dalla Corte MD , Giampiero Dolci MD , NIcola Tamburini MD , Giovanni De Paoli MD , Francesco Murgolo MD , Emma Pedarzani MA , Arianna Andalò MD , Carlo Alberto Volta Professor (Professor) , Spadaro Savino Associate Professor, PhD
{"title":"早期高流量鼻氧对胸外科手术后膈功能和肺部并发症的影响:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Alberto Fogagnolo MD ,&nbsp;Salvatore Grasso (Professor) ,&nbsp;Martin Dres (Professor) ,&nbsp;Danila Azzolina Professor, PhD ,&nbsp;Francesca Dalla Corte MD ,&nbsp;Giampiero Dolci MD ,&nbsp;NIcola Tamburini MD ,&nbsp;Giovanni De Paoli MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Murgolo MD ,&nbsp;Emma Pedarzani MA ,&nbsp;Arianna Andalò MD ,&nbsp;Carlo Alberto Volta Professor (Professor) ,&nbsp;Spadaro Savino Associate Professor, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after thoracic surgery, particularly in patients that develop postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy decreases postoperative work of breathing and provides a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effect. As a result, it may decrease the occurrence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and PPCs after thoracic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomized to receive conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. In both groups, inspiratory oxygen fraction was titrated to reach a peripheral oxygen saturation of &gt;94 %. Diaphragmatic displacement (DD) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (TF%) were measured 2 and 24 h after surgery. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was identified by DD &lt;10 mm. PPCs occurring within 7 days after study enrollment were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 116 patients in the study. Postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction occurred in 17/58 patients (29 %) in the HFNC group compared to 21/58 (36 %) in the COT group (<em>p</em> = 0.55). The rate of PPCs was similar between the two groups: 32/58 (55 %) in the HFNC group and 37/58 (64 %) in the COT group (<em>p</em> = 0.449). Patients who developed postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction experienced fewer PPCs when treated with HFNC (20/37; 54 %) compared to COT (17/21; 81 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.037). A post hoc mixed-model analysis confirmed that HFNC reduced the risk of PPCs in patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction (OR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.02–0.83).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Early HFNC support does not decrease the rate of postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction rate or respiratory complications. In patients who develop postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, HFNC may play a role in mitigating the risk of PPCs.</div><div><strong>Clinical trial registration:</strong> <span><span>NCT05532033</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 111945"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of early high flow nasal oxygen on diaphragmatic function and pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Fogagnolo MD ,&nbsp;Salvatore Grasso (Professor) ,&nbsp;Martin Dres (Professor) ,&nbsp;Danila Azzolina Professor, PhD ,&nbsp;Francesca Dalla Corte MD ,&nbsp;Giampiero Dolci MD ,&nbsp;NIcola Tamburini MD ,&nbsp;Giovanni De Paoli MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Murgolo MD ,&nbsp;Emma Pedarzani MA ,&nbsp;Arianna Andalò MD ,&nbsp;Carlo Alberto Volta Professor (Professor) ,&nbsp;Spadaro Savino Associate Professor, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after thoracic surgery, particularly in patients that develop postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy decreases postoperative work of breathing and provides a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effect. As a result, it may decrease the occurrence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and PPCs after thoracic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomized to receive conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. In both groups, inspiratory oxygen fraction was titrated to reach a peripheral oxygen saturation of &gt;94 %. Diaphragmatic displacement (DD) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (TF%) were measured 2 and 24 h after surgery. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was identified by DD &lt;10 mm. PPCs occurring within 7 days after study enrollment were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 116 patients in the study. Postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction occurred in 17/58 patients (29 %) in the HFNC group compared to 21/58 (36 %) in the COT group (<em>p</em> = 0.55). The rate of PPCs was similar between the two groups: 32/58 (55 %) in the HFNC group and 37/58 (64 %) in the COT group (<em>p</em> = 0.449). Patients who developed postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction experienced fewer PPCs when treated with HFNC (20/37; 54 %) compared to COT (17/21; 81 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.037). A post hoc mixed-model analysis confirmed that HFNC reduced the risk of PPCs in patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction (OR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.02–0.83).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Early HFNC support does not decrease the rate of postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction rate or respiratory complications. In patients who develop postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, HFNC may play a role in mitigating the risk of PPCs.</div><div><strong>Clinical trial registration:</strong> <span><span>NCT05532033</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景术后肺部并发症(PPCs)是胸外科手术后常见的并发症,尤其是术后膈功能障碍的患者。高流量鼻插管(HFNC)氧疗减少了术后呼吸功,提供了正呼气末压(PEEP)效应。因此,它可以减少胸外科手术后膈功能障碍和PPCs的发生。方法采用单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。接受电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术的患者随机接受常规氧疗(COT)或高流量鼻插管氧疗。在两组中,吸入氧分数滴定达到外周血氧饱和度为94%。术后2、24 h测量膈位移(DD)和膈增厚分数(TF%)。膈功能障碍由DD <;10 mm确定。记录入组后7天内发生的PPCs。结果我们分析了116例患者。HFNC组术后膈功能障碍发生率为17/58 (29%),COT组为21/58 (36%)(p = 0.55)。两组PPCs发生率相似:HFNC组为32/58 (55%),COT组为37/58 (64%)(p = 0.449)。术后出现膈功能障碍的患者使用HFNC治疗后PPCs减少(20/37;54%),而COT (17/21;81%) (p = 0.037)。一项事后混合模型分析证实HFNC降低了膈功能障碍患者PPCs的风险(OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02-0.83)。结论早期HFNC支持并不能降低术后膈功能障碍率及呼吸并发症的发生率。对于术后出现膈功能障碍的患者,HFNC可能在减轻PPCs的风险中发挥作用。临床试验注册:NCT05532033
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of early high flow nasal oxygen on diaphragmatic function and pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery: A randomized clinical trial

Background

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after thoracic surgery, particularly in patients that develop postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy decreases postoperative work of breathing and provides a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effect. As a result, it may decrease the occurrence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and PPCs after thoracic surgery.

Methods

Single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomized to receive conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. In both groups, inspiratory oxygen fraction was titrated to reach a peripheral oxygen saturation of >94 %. Diaphragmatic displacement (DD) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (TF%) were measured 2 and 24 h after surgery. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was identified by DD <10 mm. PPCs occurring within 7 days after study enrollment were recorded.

Results

We analyzed 116 patients in the study. Postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction occurred in 17/58 patients (29 %) in the HFNC group compared to 21/58 (36 %) in the COT group (p = 0.55). The rate of PPCs was similar between the two groups: 32/58 (55 %) in the HFNC group and 37/58 (64 %) in the COT group (p = 0.449). Patients who developed postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction experienced fewer PPCs when treated with HFNC (20/37; 54 %) compared to COT (17/21; 81 %) (p = 0.037). A post hoc mixed-model analysis confirmed that HFNC reduced the risk of PPCs in patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction (OR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.02–0.83).

Conclusions

Early HFNC support does not decrease the rate of postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction rate or respiratory complications. In patients who develop postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, HFNC may play a role in mitigating the risk of PPCs.
Clinical trial registration: NCT05532033
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信