Kali N. Whitaker , John Perkins , Katherine R. Bowlin , Brandon M. Fross , Karla Garcia , Richard Jaimes , Sarah Maknojia , Damien D. Guerrero , Dylan A. Hunter , Qiliang He
{"title":"区域标志(色带)对空间导航性别差异的影响:方向感的调节作用","authors":"Kali N. Whitaker , John Perkins , Katherine R. Bowlin , Brandon M. Fross , Karla Garcia , Richard Jaimes , Sarah Maknojia , Damien D. Guerrero , Dylan A. Hunter , Qiliang He","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While research has extensively examined how global and local landmarks influence sex differences in spatial navigation, the effects of regional landmarks—visual features that demarcate different sections within complex environments (like color zones in hospitals)—remain unexplored. These landmarks provide general location information but offer neither the precise positional information of local landmarks nor the orientational information of global landmarks. We investigate how regional landmarks affect sex differences in navigation and subsequent decision-making, examining whether these effects are moderated by self-reported sense of direction (SOD). Participants (N = 84) completed wayfinding tasks of varied difficulty in virtual environments with or without regional landmarks, followed by value-based decision-making tasks that depends on the learning outcome of the previous wayfinding tasks. We find that regional landmarks' effects on sex differences are moderated by SOD. In route-learning tasks with regional landmarks present, low-SOD men outperformed low-SOD women, whereas high-SOD women performed equally or better than high-SOD men. In task that required cognitive mapping, the SOD effect disappeared; women performed comparably to men with regional landmarks present but performed significantly worse without them. Additionally, when controlling for the consistency in basing decision-making on previous experiences, high-SOD women were more risk-taking with regional landmarks. These findings help reconcile mixed results in the literature on sex differences in landmark utilization and decision-making, and highlight the importance of considering the interaction between environmental factors and spatial ability in understanding the sex differences in spatial navigation. Our results also have practical implications for designing navigational aids in complex buildings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102688"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of regional landmarks (color zones) on sex differences in spatial navigation: The moderating role of sense of direction\",\"authors\":\"Kali N. Whitaker , John Perkins , Katherine R. Bowlin , Brandon M. Fross , Karla Garcia , Richard Jaimes , Sarah Maknojia , Damien D. Guerrero , Dylan A. Hunter , Qiliang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While research has extensively examined how global and local landmarks influence sex differences in spatial navigation, the effects of regional landmarks—visual features that demarcate different sections within complex environments (like color zones in hospitals)—remain unexplored. These landmarks provide general location information but offer neither the precise positional information of local landmarks nor the orientational information of global landmarks. We investigate how regional landmarks affect sex differences in navigation and subsequent decision-making, examining whether these effects are moderated by self-reported sense of direction (SOD). Participants (N = 84) completed wayfinding tasks of varied difficulty in virtual environments with or without regional landmarks, followed by value-based decision-making tasks that depends on the learning outcome of the previous wayfinding tasks. We find that regional landmarks' effects on sex differences are moderated by SOD. In route-learning tasks with regional landmarks present, low-SOD men outperformed low-SOD women, whereas high-SOD women performed equally or better than high-SOD men. In task that required cognitive mapping, the SOD effect disappeared; women performed comparably to men with regional landmarks present but performed significantly worse without them. Additionally, when controlling for the consistency in basing decision-making on previous experiences, high-SOD women were more risk-taking with regional landmarks. These findings help reconcile mixed results in the literature on sex differences in landmark utilization and decision-making, and highlight the importance of considering the interaction between environmental factors and spatial ability in understanding the sex differences in spatial navigation. Our results also have practical implications for designing navigational aids in complex buildings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001719\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001719","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The influence of regional landmarks (color zones) on sex differences in spatial navigation: The moderating role of sense of direction
While research has extensively examined how global and local landmarks influence sex differences in spatial navigation, the effects of regional landmarks—visual features that demarcate different sections within complex environments (like color zones in hospitals)—remain unexplored. These landmarks provide general location information but offer neither the precise positional information of local landmarks nor the orientational information of global landmarks. We investigate how regional landmarks affect sex differences in navigation and subsequent decision-making, examining whether these effects are moderated by self-reported sense of direction (SOD). Participants (N = 84) completed wayfinding tasks of varied difficulty in virtual environments with or without regional landmarks, followed by value-based decision-making tasks that depends on the learning outcome of the previous wayfinding tasks. We find that regional landmarks' effects on sex differences are moderated by SOD. In route-learning tasks with regional landmarks present, low-SOD men outperformed low-SOD women, whereas high-SOD women performed equally or better than high-SOD men. In task that required cognitive mapping, the SOD effect disappeared; women performed comparably to men with regional landmarks present but performed significantly worse without them. Additionally, when controlling for the consistency in basing decision-making on previous experiences, high-SOD women were more risk-taking with regional landmarks. These findings help reconcile mixed results in the literature on sex differences in landmark utilization and decision-making, and highlight the importance of considering the interaction between environmental factors and spatial ability in understanding the sex differences in spatial navigation. Our results also have practical implications for designing navigational aids in complex buildings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space