{"title":"Fe-M双金属位催化剂氧还原反应机理研究","authors":"Can Deng and Chaofang Deng","doi":"10.1039/D5CP01857A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Introducing transition metals adjacent to the Fe site in Fe–N–C single-atom catalysts to construct double-atom catalysts (DACs) presents a promising strategy for enhancing the performance of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). However, the understanding of the catalytic mechanisms of DACs remains controversial, thereby hindering the rational design of ideal DACs. In this work, we constructed seven iron–metal–nitrogen–carbon catalysts (denoted as Fe–M@NC, M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) to gain in-depth insights into the catalytic mechanisms. We found that Fe–Fe@NC and Fe–Co@NC exhibit superior ORR activity compared to the other constructed catalysts, featuring higher limiting potentials of 1.081 V and 0.888 V, respectively. Detailed reaction mechanism analysis revealed that in the absence of potential effects, the ORR on these two catalysts follows the dissociative pathway. By contrast, when the potential was considered, they catalyze the ORR <em>via</em> the associative mechanism. This discrepancy arises because O<small><sub>2</sub></small> adsorption energy weakens under uniform potential conditions, which is unfavorable for direct cleavage of the O<img>O bond. Therefore, it manifests as the associate mechanism. Under this mechanism, the limiting potentials of these DACs are both around 0.9 V, consistent with the experimental results. Additionally, the adsorption energies of other ORR intermediates also exhibit nonlinear dependence on the electrode potential. This study demonstrates the advantages of Fe–Fe@NC and Fe–Co@NC catalysts in the ORR and emphasizes the critical role of potential effects in understanding catalyst reaction mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":99,"journal":{"name":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","volume":" 34","pages":" 17829-17838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic insights into Fe–M dual-metal-site catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction†\",\"authors\":\"Can Deng and Chaofang Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5CP01857A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Introducing transition metals adjacent to the Fe site in Fe–N–C single-atom catalysts to construct double-atom catalysts (DACs) presents a promising strategy for enhancing the performance of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). However, the understanding of the catalytic mechanisms of DACs remains controversial, thereby hindering the rational design of ideal DACs. In this work, we constructed seven iron–metal–nitrogen–carbon catalysts (denoted as Fe–M@NC, M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) to gain in-depth insights into the catalytic mechanisms. We found that Fe–Fe@NC and Fe–Co@NC exhibit superior ORR activity compared to the other constructed catalysts, featuring higher limiting potentials of 1.081 V and 0.888 V, respectively. Detailed reaction mechanism analysis revealed that in the absence of potential effects, the ORR on these two catalysts follows the dissociative pathway. By contrast, when the potential was considered, they catalyze the ORR <em>via</em> the associative mechanism. This discrepancy arises because O<small><sub>2</sub></small> adsorption energy weakens under uniform potential conditions, which is unfavorable for direct cleavage of the O<img>O bond. Therefore, it manifests as the associate mechanism. Under this mechanism, the limiting potentials of these DACs are both around 0.9 V, consistent with the experimental results. Additionally, the adsorption energies of other ORR intermediates also exhibit nonlinear dependence on the electrode potential. This study demonstrates the advantages of Fe–Fe@NC and Fe–Co@NC catalysts in the ORR and emphasizes the critical role of potential effects in understanding catalyst reaction mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":99,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":\" 34\",\"pages\":\" 17829-17838\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cp/d5cp01857a\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cp/d5cp01857a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在Fe- n - c单原子催化剂的Fe位点附近引入过渡金属来构建双原子催化剂(DACs)是提高氧还原反应(ORR)性能的一种很有前途的策略。然而,对DACs的催化机理的理解仍然存在争议,从而阻碍了理想DACs的合理设计。在这项工作中,我们构建了七种铁-金属-氮-碳催化剂(注意Fe-M@NC, M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn),以深入了解催化机理。我们发现Fe-Fe@NC和Fe-Co@NC与其他构建的催化剂相比,表现出更好的ORR活性,其极限电位分别为1.081 V和0.888 V。详细的反应机理分析表明,在没有潜在效应的情况下,ORR对这两种催化剂的作用遵循解离途径。当考虑电位时,它们通过联想机制催化ORR。这种差异的产生是由于在等电位条件下O2吸附能减弱,不利于O=O键的直接裂解。因此,它表现为关联机制。在此机制下,这些dac的极限电位都在0.9 V左右,与实验结果一致。此外,其他ORR中间体的吸附能也与电极电位呈非线性关系。本研究证明了Fe-Fe@NC和Fe-Co@NC催化剂在ORR中的优势,并强调了潜在效应在理解催化剂活性和反应机理方面的关键作用。
Mechanistic insights into Fe–M dual-metal-site catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction†
Introducing transition metals adjacent to the Fe site in Fe–N–C single-atom catalysts to construct double-atom catalysts (DACs) presents a promising strategy for enhancing the performance of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). However, the understanding of the catalytic mechanisms of DACs remains controversial, thereby hindering the rational design of ideal DACs. In this work, we constructed seven iron–metal–nitrogen–carbon catalysts (denoted as Fe–M@NC, M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) to gain in-depth insights into the catalytic mechanisms. We found that Fe–Fe@NC and Fe–Co@NC exhibit superior ORR activity compared to the other constructed catalysts, featuring higher limiting potentials of 1.081 V and 0.888 V, respectively. Detailed reaction mechanism analysis revealed that in the absence of potential effects, the ORR on these two catalysts follows the dissociative pathway. By contrast, when the potential was considered, they catalyze the ORR via the associative mechanism. This discrepancy arises because O2 adsorption energy weakens under uniform potential conditions, which is unfavorable for direct cleavage of the OO bond. Therefore, it manifests as the associate mechanism. Under this mechanism, the limiting potentials of these DACs are both around 0.9 V, consistent with the experimental results. Additionally, the adsorption energies of other ORR intermediates also exhibit nonlinear dependence on the electrode potential. This study demonstrates the advantages of Fe–Fe@NC and Fe–Co@NC catalysts in the ORR and emphasizes the critical role of potential effects in understanding catalyst reaction mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions.
The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.