糖尿病技术和治疗方法获取和使用的差异:叙述性回顾。

IF 10.2 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ananta Addala,Mcking I Amedari,Lauren E Figg,Osagie Ebekozien
{"title":"糖尿病技术和治疗方法获取和使用的差异:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Ananta Addala,Mcking I Amedari,Lauren E Figg,Osagie Ebekozien","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06494-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This narrative review applies neo-materialist theory to examine disparities in diabetes care across four domains: clinical trials, diabetes technology, immunotherapies and adjuvant digital technologies. Although systemic marginalisation can occur in many forms (e.g. based on ability, language, sex, gender or age), this review focuses on marginalisation based on race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status, as these are the key areas supported by the current evidence base. Under-representation of minoritised groups in clinical trials of diabetes interventions may limit the generalisability of the data generated. Contributing factors to under-representation include historical mistrust, exclusionary criteria and lack of cultural competence in research. Potential solutions to these disparities include revising trial protocols, engaging community partners and improving recruitment strategies; however, studies examining these solutions are limited. Disparities in access to diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitoring and artificial pancreas systems, appear to be influenced by intersectional factors including race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and insurance coverage. Despite awareness of these disparities, gaps in technology use persist because the causal pathways that determine these disparities are complex. Solutions are likely to involve education, improved access and policy reforms to address social and structural determinants of health. Disparities in access to immunotherapies, particularly in type 1 diabetes, may stem in part from under-representation of minoritised groups in research. Strategies to address these disparities include ensuring equitable access and performing inclusive data collection on social determinants of health. The digital divide in diabetes care is a key barrier to adjuvant digital technology use, with unequal access to smartphones, broadband and telemedicine. Bridging this gap will require improved infrastructure, increased access to digital tools and targeted telemedicine interventions to enhance care in underserved populations. Addressing these disparities requires comprehensive multifaceted strategies that recognise the complexity of structural inequities, including policy changes, improved technology access and inclusive research practices.","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"673 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in access to and use of diabetes technologies and therapeutics: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Ananta Addala,Mcking I Amedari,Lauren E Figg,Osagie Ebekozien\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00125-025-06494-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This narrative review applies neo-materialist theory to examine disparities in diabetes care across four domains: clinical trials, diabetes technology, immunotherapies and adjuvant digital technologies. Although systemic marginalisation can occur in many forms (e.g. based on ability, language, sex, gender or age), this review focuses on marginalisation based on race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status, as these are the key areas supported by the current evidence base. Under-representation of minoritised groups in clinical trials of diabetes interventions may limit the generalisability of the data generated. Contributing factors to under-representation include historical mistrust, exclusionary criteria and lack of cultural competence in research. Potential solutions to these disparities include revising trial protocols, engaging community partners and improving recruitment strategies; however, studies examining these solutions are limited. Disparities in access to diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitoring and artificial pancreas systems, appear to be influenced by intersectional factors including race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and insurance coverage. Despite awareness of these disparities, gaps in technology use persist because the causal pathways that determine these disparities are complex. Solutions are likely to involve education, improved access and policy reforms to address social and structural determinants of health. Disparities in access to immunotherapies, particularly in type 1 diabetes, may stem in part from under-representation of minoritised groups in research. Strategies to address these disparities include ensuring equitable access and performing inclusive data collection on social determinants of health. The digital divide in diabetes care is a key barrier to adjuvant digital technology use, with unequal access to smartphones, broadband and telemedicine. Bridging this gap will require improved infrastructure, increased access to digital tools and targeted telemedicine interventions to enhance care in underserved populations. Addressing these disparities requires comprehensive multifaceted strategies that recognise the complexity of structural inequities, including policy changes, improved technology access and inclusive research practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetologia\",\"volume\":\"673 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06494-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06494-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用新唯物主义理论来考察糖尿病护理在四个领域的差异:临床试验、糖尿病技术、免疫疗法和辅助数字技术。尽管系统性边缘化可能以多种形式出现(例如基于能力、语言、性别、性别或年龄),但本综述侧重于基于种族、民族和社会经济地位的边缘化,因为这些是当前证据基础支持的关键领域。在糖尿病干预的临床试验中,少数群体的代表性不足可能会限制所产生数据的普遍性。造成代表性不足的因素包括历史上的不信任、排斥标准和研究中缺乏文化能力。解决这些差异的潜在办法包括修订试验方案、吸引社区合作伙伴和改进招募策略;然而,检验这些解决方案的研究是有限的。获得糖尿病技术的差异,如连续血糖监测和人工胰腺系统,似乎受到包括种族、民族、社会经济地位和保险范围在内的交叉因素的影响。尽管人们意识到了这些差异,但技术使用方面的差距仍然存在,因为决定这些差异的因果途径是复杂的。解决办法可能涉及教育、改善获得机会和政策改革,以解决健康的社会和结构决定因素。在获得免疫疗法方面的差异,特别是在1型糖尿病方面,可能部分源于研究中少数群体的代表性不足。解决这些差异的战略包括确保公平获取和开展关于健康的社会决定因素的包容性数据收集。糖尿病护理中的数字鸿沟是辅助数字技术使用的主要障碍,智能手机、宽带和远程医疗的获取不平等。弥合这一差距将需要改善基础设施,增加数字工具的使用,并有针对性地进行远程医疗干预,以加强对服务不足人群的护理。解决这些差异需要全面的多方面战略,认识到结构性不平等的复杂性,包括政策变化、改善技术获取和包容性研究实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in access to and use of diabetes technologies and therapeutics: a narrative review.
This narrative review applies neo-materialist theory to examine disparities in diabetes care across four domains: clinical trials, diabetes technology, immunotherapies and adjuvant digital technologies. Although systemic marginalisation can occur in many forms (e.g. based on ability, language, sex, gender or age), this review focuses on marginalisation based on race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status, as these are the key areas supported by the current evidence base. Under-representation of minoritised groups in clinical trials of diabetes interventions may limit the generalisability of the data generated. Contributing factors to under-representation include historical mistrust, exclusionary criteria and lack of cultural competence in research. Potential solutions to these disparities include revising trial protocols, engaging community partners and improving recruitment strategies; however, studies examining these solutions are limited. Disparities in access to diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitoring and artificial pancreas systems, appear to be influenced by intersectional factors including race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and insurance coverage. Despite awareness of these disparities, gaps in technology use persist because the causal pathways that determine these disparities are complex. Solutions are likely to involve education, improved access and policy reforms to address social and structural determinants of health. Disparities in access to immunotherapies, particularly in type 1 diabetes, may stem in part from under-representation of minoritised groups in research. Strategies to address these disparities include ensuring equitable access and performing inclusive data collection on social determinants of health. The digital divide in diabetes care is a key barrier to adjuvant digital technology use, with unequal access to smartphones, broadband and telemedicine. Bridging this gap will require improved infrastructure, increased access to digital tools and targeted telemedicine interventions to enhance care in underserved populations. Addressing these disparities requires comprehensive multifaceted strategies that recognise the complexity of structural inequities, including policy changes, improved technology access and inclusive research practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信