“难啃的硬骨头”:标准不一致是南非豪登省公立医院卫生信息系统数据互操作性的障碍。

Oxford open digital health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/oodh/oqaf013
Kabelo Given Chuma
{"title":"“难啃的硬骨头”:标准不一致是南非豪登省公立医院卫生信息系统数据互操作性的障碍。","authors":"Kabelo Given Chuma","doi":"10.1093/oodh/oqaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standards are pivotal in achieving significant levels of data interoperability in the healthcare industry. However, inconsistent data standards and ambiguous guidelines stifle data interoperability in healthcare. Public sector hospitals in South Africa, particularly in Gauteng Province, face challenges in attaining data interoperability due to discrepancies in standards. This study investigates inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. A convergent parallel mixed methods research design was adopted, using an online questionnaire with 144 clinical and administrative personnel and semi-structured interviews with 16 managers. A multi-level sampling was used to select participants possessing the necessary expertise and experience in data interoperability and health information systems. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS for descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed using the ATLAS.ti. The results indicated that hospitals in Gauteng adhere to multiple, conflicting standards, complicating data interoperability. Key factors contributing to this issue included legacy health systems, disparate systems, insufficient knowledge and awareness, weak regulations, and limited stakeholder collaboration. Furthermore, there was a notable lack of compliance with interoperability standards among hospitals. The study underscores the pressing need for coordinated efforts from policymakers, regulatory bodies, and health stakeholders to establish and enforce policies and standardized frameworks mandating uniform standards for interoperability. In conclusion, the cohesive implementation of uniform standards for data interoperability requires a holistic approach, incorporating clear policies, ongoing compliance monitoring, stakeholder collaboration, and continuous training to ensure the efficient exchange of healthcare data.</p>","PeriodicalId":520498,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open digital health","volume":"3 ","pages":"oqaf013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'A tough nut to crack': inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Kabelo Given Chuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oodh/oqaf013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Standards are pivotal in achieving significant levels of data interoperability in the healthcare industry. However, inconsistent data standards and ambiguous guidelines stifle data interoperability in healthcare. Public sector hospitals in South Africa, particularly in Gauteng Province, face challenges in attaining data interoperability due to discrepancies in standards. This study investigates inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. A convergent parallel mixed methods research design was adopted, using an online questionnaire with 144 clinical and administrative personnel and semi-structured interviews with 16 managers. A multi-level sampling was used to select participants possessing the necessary expertise and experience in data interoperability and health information systems. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS for descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed using the ATLAS.ti. The results indicated that hospitals in Gauteng adhere to multiple, conflicting standards, complicating data interoperability. Key factors contributing to this issue included legacy health systems, disparate systems, insufficient knowledge and awareness, weak regulations, and limited stakeholder collaboration. Furthermore, there was a notable lack of compliance with interoperability standards among hospitals. The study underscores the pressing need for coordinated efforts from policymakers, regulatory bodies, and health stakeholders to establish and enforce policies and standardized frameworks mandating uniform standards for interoperability. In conclusion, the cohesive implementation of uniform standards for data interoperability requires a holistic approach, incorporating clear policies, ongoing compliance monitoring, stakeholder collaboration, and continuous training to ensure the efficient exchange of healthcare data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford open digital health\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"oqaf013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279051/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford open digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oodh/oqaf013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oodh/oqaf013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医疗保健行业中,标准对于实现重要级别的数据互操作性至关重要。然而,不一致的数据标准和模糊的指导方针阻碍了医疗保健中的数据互操作性。由于标准差异,南非,特别是豪登省的公立医院在实现数据互操作性方面面临挑战。本研究调查了不一致的标准是阻碍南非豪登省公立医院卫生信息系统数据互操作性的障碍。采用趋同平行混合方法研究设计,对144名临床和行政人员进行在线问卷调查,对16名管理人员进行半结构化访谈。采用多层次抽样方法选择在数据互操作性和卫生信息系统方面具有必要专业知识和经验的参与者。定量数据采用SPSS进行描述性统计,定性数据采用ATLAS.ti进行专题分析。结果表明,豪登省的医院坚持多种相互冲突的标准,使数据互操作性复杂化。造成这一问题的关键因素包括遗留的卫生系统、不同的系统、知识和意识不足、法规薄弱以及利益攸关方合作有限。此外,医院之间明显缺乏对互操作性标准的遵守。该研究强调,迫切需要决策者、监管机构和卫生利益攸关方协调努力,建立和执行规定互操作性统一标准的政策和标准化框架。总之,数据互操作性统一标准的统一实现需要一种整体方法,包括明确的政策、持续的合规性监控、利益相关方协作和持续培训,以确保医疗保健数据的有效交换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

'A tough nut to crack': inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa.

'A tough nut to crack': inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa.

'A tough nut to crack': inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa.

'A tough nut to crack': inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa.

Standards are pivotal in achieving significant levels of data interoperability in the healthcare industry. However, inconsistent data standards and ambiguous guidelines stifle data interoperability in healthcare. Public sector hospitals in South Africa, particularly in Gauteng Province, face challenges in attaining data interoperability due to discrepancies in standards. This study investigates inconsistent standards as roadblocks to data interoperability of health information systems in public hospitals in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. A convergent parallel mixed methods research design was adopted, using an online questionnaire with 144 clinical and administrative personnel and semi-structured interviews with 16 managers. A multi-level sampling was used to select participants possessing the necessary expertise and experience in data interoperability and health information systems. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS for descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed using the ATLAS.ti. The results indicated that hospitals in Gauteng adhere to multiple, conflicting standards, complicating data interoperability. Key factors contributing to this issue included legacy health systems, disparate systems, insufficient knowledge and awareness, weak regulations, and limited stakeholder collaboration. Furthermore, there was a notable lack of compliance with interoperability standards among hospitals. The study underscores the pressing need for coordinated efforts from policymakers, regulatory bodies, and health stakeholders to establish and enforce policies and standardized frameworks mandating uniform standards for interoperability. In conclusion, the cohesive implementation of uniform standards for data interoperability requires a holistic approach, incorporating clear policies, ongoing compliance monitoring, stakeholder collaboration, and continuous training to ensure the efficient exchange of healthcare data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信