Emeline Nogues, Ava Arends, Marina A G von Keyserlingk
{"title":"快速系统文献综述:生态研究中的相机陷阱取样:对野生动物福利的考虑。","authors":"Emeline Nogues, Ava Arends, Marina A G von Keyserlingk","doi":"10.1017/awf.2025.10014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of camera traps in wildlife conservation and ecological research is a popular method of data capture due in large part to the perceived low interference levels for the animals being studied. However, evidence exists that some species alter their behaviour when exposed to this technology. The primary aim of this study was to address whether researchers working with this technology in the ecology and forestry fields are making considerations for the possible impacts of cameras on animal behaviour. A secondary aim was to investigate how the use of this technology is framed in recent publications. In this rapid systematic literature review, we conducted a search on Web of Science and we identified 267 papers published in the last five years, in the fields of ecology and forestry, that met our inclusion criteria. We screened the studies for mentions of the impact of camera traps on the welfare of wildlife. Surprisingly, only 7.5% of the papers considered the possible animal welfare impacts of camera use on the wildlife species of interest in their study, with most comparing it to invasive methods and therefore framing this technology positively. We strongly encourage researchers working in this field to consider the impact of this technology on the specific species being studied. Whilst we recognise that the use of camera traps avoids direct handling of the animals, the short- and long-term effects of using this technology should not be ignored and should, at a minimum, be acknowledged in the limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520228,"journal":{"name":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","volume":"34 ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid systematic literature review: Camera trap sampling in ecological studies: Considerations of wildlife welfare.\",\"authors\":\"Emeline Nogues, Ava Arends, Marina A G von Keyserlingk\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/awf.2025.10014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of camera traps in wildlife conservation and ecological research is a popular method of data capture due in large part to the perceived low interference levels for the animals being studied. However, evidence exists that some species alter their behaviour when exposed to this technology. The primary aim of this study was to address whether researchers working with this technology in the ecology and forestry fields are making considerations for the possible impacts of cameras on animal behaviour. A secondary aim was to investigate how the use of this technology is framed in recent publications. In this rapid systematic literature review, we conducted a search on Web of Science and we identified 267 papers published in the last five years, in the fields of ecology and forestry, that met our inclusion criteria. We screened the studies for mentions of the impact of camera traps on the welfare of wildlife. Surprisingly, only 7.5% of the papers considered the possible animal welfare impacts of camera use on the wildlife species of interest in their study, with most comparing it to invasive methods and therefore framing this technology positively. We strongly encourage researchers working in this field to consider the impact of this technology on the specific species being studied. Whilst we recognise that the use of camera traps avoids direct handling of the animals, the short- and long-term effects of using this technology should not be ignored and should, at a minimum, be acknowledged in the limitations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"e44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2025.10014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2025.10014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在野生动物保护和生态研究中使用相机陷阱是一种流行的数据捕获方法,这在很大程度上是因为对被研究动物的干扰水平较低。然而,有证据表明,一些物种在接触到这种技术后会改变它们的行为。这项研究的主要目的是解决在生态学和林业领域使用这项技术的研究人员是否考虑到相机对动物行为的可能影响。第二个目的是调查这项技术的使用是如何在最近的出版物框架。在这个快速系统的文献综述中,我们在Web of Science上进行了搜索,并确定了过去五年在生态学和林业领域发表的267篇论文,符合我们的纳入标准。我们筛选了提到相机陷阱对野生动物福利影响的研究。令人惊讶的是,只有7.5%的论文考虑了相机对他们研究中感兴趣的野生动物物种可能产生的动物福利影响,大多数将其与侵入性方法进行比较,因此对这项技术进行了积极的评价。我们强烈鼓励在这一领域工作的研究人员考虑这项技术对正在研究的特定物种的影响。虽然我们认识到使用相机陷阱可以避免直接处理动物,但使用这项技术的短期和长期影响不应被忽视,至少应该承认其局限性。
Rapid systematic literature review: Camera trap sampling in ecological studies: Considerations of wildlife welfare.
The use of camera traps in wildlife conservation and ecological research is a popular method of data capture due in large part to the perceived low interference levels for the animals being studied. However, evidence exists that some species alter their behaviour when exposed to this technology. The primary aim of this study was to address whether researchers working with this technology in the ecology and forestry fields are making considerations for the possible impacts of cameras on animal behaviour. A secondary aim was to investigate how the use of this technology is framed in recent publications. In this rapid systematic literature review, we conducted a search on Web of Science and we identified 267 papers published in the last five years, in the fields of ecology and forestry, that met our inclusion criteria. We screened the studies for mentions of the impact of camera traps on the welfare of wildlife. Surprisingly, only 7.5% of the papers considered the possible animal welfare impacts of camera use on the wildlife species of interest in their study, with most comparing it to invasive methods and therefore framing this technology positively. We strongly encourage researchers working in this field to consider the impact of this technology on the specific species being studied. Whilst we recognise that the use of camera traps avoids direct handling of the animals, the short- and long-term effects of using this technology should not be ignored and should, at a minimum, be acknowledged in the limitations.