注意差距:医疗准备时间线分析和出院延误的定性审查。

Madeleine Nowak, Matthew Bye, Amanda Rogers
{"title":"注意差距:医疗准备时间线分析和出院延误的定性审查。","authors":"Madeleine Nowak, Matthew Bye, Amanda Rogers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Efficient discharges lead to decreased length of stay and improved hospital flow. An efficient discharge requires timely recognition of medical readiness for discharge (MRD) and effective preparation. The objective of this study was to better understand pediatric hospital medicine discharges by (1) analyzing the time of MRD and discharge throughout the day, (2) assessing the time from MRD to discharge, and (3) categorizing commonly identified discharge delays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of pediatric hospital medicine patients with the diagnoses of asthma, \"brief resolved unexplained event,\" hyperbilirubinemia, or \"rule out sepsis neonates\" was completed. MRD was determined by reviewing the patient's chart for completion of diagnosis-specific discharge criteria. MRD was compared to the time of discharge order and discharge. Delayed discharges were reviewed further to identify reasons for the delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred discharge events were analyzed - 25 from each of the 4 selected diagnoses. MRD occurred throughout the day (33% morning, 43% afternoon, 14% evening, and 10% night). The median time from MRD to discharge was 1.7 hours (0.5 hours from MRD to discharge order and 0.9 hours from order to discharge), with the longest MRD to discharge time in asthma patients. Forty percent of patients had a delayed discharge, and identified reasons for delays were further categorized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRD occurred throughout the day, suggesting the MRD to discharge time may be an informative metric of discharge efficiency. Next steps include developing forward-facing electronic health record alerts noting MRD for improved tracking and real-time communication and targeted interventions to address reasons for discharge delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"124 2","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the Gap: Analysis of the Timeline of Medical Readiness and Qualitative Review of Discharge Delays.\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Nowak, Matthew Bye, Amanda Rogers\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Efficient discharges lead to decreased length of stay and improved hospital flow. An efficient discharge requires timely recognition of medical readiness for discharge (MRD) and effective preparation. The objective of this study was to better understand pediatric hospital medicine discharges by (1) analyzing the time of MRD and discharge throughout the day, (2) assessing the time from MRD to discharge, and (3) categorizing commonly identified discharge delays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of pediatric hospital medicine patients with the diagnoses of asthma, \\\"brief resolved unexplained event,\\\" hyperbilirubinemia, or \\\"rule out sepsis neonates\\\" was completed. MRD was determined by reviewing the patient's chart for completion of diagnosis-specific discharge criteria. MRD was compared to the time of discharge order and discharge. Delayed discharges were reviewed further to identify reasons for the delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred discharge events were analyzed - 25 from each of the 4 selected diagnoses. MRD occurred throughout the day (33% morning, 43% afternoon, 14% evening, and 10% night). The median time from MRD to discharge was 1.7 hours (0.5 hours from MRD to discharge order and 0.9 hours from order to discharge), with the longest MRD to discharge time in asthma patients. Forty percent of patients had a delayed discharge, and identified reasons for delays were further categorized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRD occurred throughout the day, suggesting the MRD to discharge time may be an informative metric of discharge efficiency. Next steps include developing forward-facing electronic health record alerts noting MRD for improved tracking and real-time communication and targeted interventions to address reasons for discharge delays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin\",\"volume\":\"124 2\",\"pages\":\"96-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:有效的出院减少了住院时间,提高了医院的流量。有效的出院需要及时识别医疗准备出院(MRD)和有效的准备。本研究的目的是通过(1)分析全天MRD和出院的时间,(2)评估MRD到出院的时间,(3)对常见的出院延误进行分类,更好地了解儿科医院的药物出院情况。方法:对诊断为哮喘、“短暂解决不明原因事件”、高胆红素血症或“排除新生儿败血症”的儿科医院内科患者进行回顾性图表复习。MRD是通过检查患者的病历来确定的,以完成诊断特定的出院标准。将MRD与出院顺序和出院时间进行比较。对延迟放行进行进一步审查,以确定延迟的原因。结果:分析了100例出院事件,4种诊断各25例。MRD发生在全天(上午33%,下午43%,晚上14%,晚上10%)。MRD至出院的中位时间为1.7小时(从MRD至出院令为0.5小时,从出院令至出院令为0.9小时),其中哮喘患者MRD至出院时间最长。40%的患者延迟出院,并确定延迟的原因进一步分类。结论:MRD全天发生,表明MRD与出院时间可能是出院效率的信息指标。接下来的步骤包括开发面向前方的电子健康记录警报,指出MRD,以改进跟踪和实时通信,以及有针对性的干预措施,以解决出院延误的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the Gap: Analysis of the Timeline of Medical Readiness and Qualitative Review of Discharge Delays.

Introduction: Efficient discharges lead to decreased length of stay and improved hospital flow. An efficient discharge requires timely recognition of medical readiness for discharge (MRD) and effective preparation. The objective of this study was to better understand pediatric hospital medicine discharges by (1) analyzing the time of MRD and discharge throughout the day, (2) assessing the time from MRD to discharge, and (3) categorizing commonly identified discharge delays.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of pediatric hospital medicine patients with the diagnoses of asthma, "brief resolved unexplained event," hyperbilirubinemia, or "rule out sepsis neonates" was completed. MRD was determined by reviewing the patient's chart for completion of diagnosis-specific discharge criteria. MRD was compared to the time of discharge order and discharge. Delayed discharges were reviewed further to identify reasons for the delay.

Results: One hundred discharge events were analyzed - 25 from each of the 4 selected diagnoses. MRD occurred throughout the day (33% morning, 43% afternoon, 14% evening, and 10% night). The median time from MRD to discharge was 1.7 hours (0.5 hours from MRD to discharge order and 0.9 hours from order to discharge), with the longest MRD to discharge time in asthma patients. Forty percent of patients had a delayed discharge, and identified reasons for delays were further categorized.

Conclusions: MRD occurred throughout the day, suggesting the MRD to discharge time may be an informative metric of discharge efficiency. Next steps include developing forward-facing electronic health record alerts noting MRD for improved tracking and real-time communication and targeted interventions to address reasons for discharge delays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信