为什么我们要容忍博彩业的活动?

Future healthcare journal Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100267
May Ci van Schalkwyk, Rebecca Cassidy
{"title":"为什么我们要容忍博彩业的活动?","authors":"May Ci van Schalkwyk, Rebecca Cassidy","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explains how gambling policy in the UK perpetuates exceptionalism by, among other things, promoting a way of understanding the drivers of gambling harm that is highly favourable to the interests of the industry and its political allies. It argues that this exceptionalism should come to an end, that completely transformative ways of thinking about this industry are possible, and considers what that would mean for gambling legislation and research. This is achieved by taking the reader on a reflective journey that involves stepping back and critiquing the taken for granted by posing a set of thought-provoking rhetorical questions. In order to support the case against exceptionalism, the article makes illuminating comparisons between gambling and other industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"12 2","pages":"100267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do we tolerate the activities of the gambling industry?\",\"authors\":\"May Ci van Schalkwyk, Rebecca Cassidy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article explains how gambling policy in the UK perpetuates exceptionalism by, among other things, promoting a way of understanding the drivers of gambling harm that is highly favourable to the interests of the industry and its political allies. It argues that this exceptionalism should come to an end, that completely transformative ways of thinking about this industry are possible, and considers what that would mean for gambling legislation and research. This is achieved by taking the reader on a reflective journey that involves stepping back and critiquing the taken for granted by posing a set of thought-provoking rhetorical questions. In order to support the case against exceptionalism, the article makes illuminating comparisons between gambling and other industries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future healthcare journal\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"100267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future healthcare journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文解释了英国的赌博政策如何通过推广一种理解赌博危害的驱动因素的方式来延续例外主义,这对该行业及其政治盟友的利益非常有利。它认为这种例外主义应该结束,完全改变对这个行业的思考方式是可能的,并考虑了这对赌博立法和研究的意义。这是通过将读者带入一段反思之旅来实现的,其中包括退后一步,通过提出一系列发人深省的修辞问题来批评想当然的东西。为了支持反对例外论的观点,文章对博彩业和其他行业进行了富有启发性的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why do we tolerate the activities of the gambling industry?

This article explains how gambling policy in the UK perpetuates exceptionalism by, among other things, promoting a way of understanding the drivers of gambling harm that is highly favourable to the interests of the industry and its political allies. It argues that this exceptionalism should come to an end, that completely transformative ways of thinking about this industry are possible, and considers what that would mean for gambling legislation and research. This is achieved by taking the reader on a reflective journey that involves stepping back and critiquing the taken for granted by posing a set of thought-provoking rhetorical questions. In order to support the case against exceptionalism, the article makes illuminating comparisons between gambling and other industries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信