分子靶向治疗加PD-(L)1伴或不伴TACE治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的有效性和安全性比较:一项回顾性研究。

IF 4.4 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
ImmunoTargets and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ITT.S495451
Jiangtao Liu, Yan Wang, Li Cui, Yan Nie, Chao Li, Wenle Tan, Ye Li, Yanhua Bai, Tao Wan, Bingyang Hu, Zhe Liu, Minggen Hu, Maoqiang Wang, Feng Duan
{"title":"分子靶向治疗加PD-(L)1伴或不伴TACE治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的有效性和安全性比较:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Jiangtao Liu, Yan Wang, Li Cui, Yan Nie, Chao Li, Wenle Tan, Ye Li, Yanhua Bai, Tao Wan, Bingyang Hu, Zhe Liu, Minggen Hu, Maoqiang Wang, Feng Duan","doi":"10.2147/ITT.S495451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of TACE combined with molecular targeted therapy (MTT) plus Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) antibodies versus MTT plus PD-(L)1 antibodies for HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from HCC patients who received either MTT plus PD-(L)1 (systemic therapy group) or TACE combined with MTT plus PD-(L)1 (combination therapy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the objective reaction rate (ORR) at the initial assessment post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included progressive free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and grade-3 or higher adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 222 HCC patients were included (109 in the systemic therapy group, 113 in the combination therapy group). Propensity score matching yielded 80 patients per group. The odds ratio for ORR in the combination therapy group was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.64-2.60; p=0.479). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher ORR for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL in the combination therapy group (OR=3.54, p=0.016). For patients without PVTT, the ORR odds were slightly higher with combination therapy (OR=5.33, p=0.068). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant differences in PFS (HR=0.68, p=0.131) or OS (HR=0.86, p=0.674) between the two groups. Higher baseline AFP (>200 ng/mL) was associated with worse PFS (HR=1.68, p=0.012) and OS (HR=2.33, p=0.021). Surgical resection improved PFS (HR=0.42, p<0.001) and OS (HR=0.31, p=0.004). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common in the combination therapy group (52% vs 15%, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant benefits were observed for combining TACE with MTT and PD-(L)1 in unresectable HCC patients. However, TACE may offer advantages for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL or without PVTT.</p>","PeriodicalId":30986,"journal":{"name":"ImmunoTargets and Therapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"761-771"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Molecular Targeted Therapy Plus PD-(L)1 with or without TACE in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiangtao Liu, Yan Wang, Li Cui, Yan Nie, Chao Li, Wenle Tan, Ye Li, Yanhua Bai, Tao Wan, Bingyang Hu, Zhe Liu, Minggen Hu, Maoqiang Wang, Feng Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ITT.S495451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of TACE combined with molecular targeted therapy (MTT) plus Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) antibodies versus MTT plus PD-(L)1 antibodies for HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from HCC patients who received either MTT plus PD-(L)1 (systemic therapy group) or TACE combined with MTT plus PD-(L)1 (combination therapy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the objective reaction rate (ORR) at the initial assessment post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included progressive free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and grade-3 or higher adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 222 HCC patients were included (109 in the systemic therapy group, 113 in the combination therapy group). Propensity score matching yielded 80 patients per group. The odds ratio for ORR in the combination therapy group was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.64-2.60; p=0.479). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher ORR for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL in the combination therapy group (OR=3.54, p=0.016). For patients without PVTT, the ORR odds were slightly higher with combination therapy (OR=5.33, p=0.068). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant differences in PFS (HR=0.68, p=0.131) or OS (HR=0.86, p=0.674) between the two groups. Higher baseline AFP (>200 ng/mL) was associated with worse PFS (HR=1.68, p=0.012) and OS (HR=2.33, p=0.021). Surgical resection improved PFS (HR=0.42, p<0.001) and OS (HR=0.31, p=0.004). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common in the combination therapy group (52% vs 15%, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant benefits were observed for combining TACE with MTT and PD-(L)1 in unresectable HCC patients. However, TACE may offer advantages for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL or without PVTT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ImmunoTargets and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"761-771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ImmunoTargets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S495451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ImmunoTargets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S495451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较TACE联合分子靶向治疗(MTT) +程序性死亡配体1 (PD-(L)1)抗体与MTT + PD-(L)1抗体治疗HCC患者的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析接受MTT + PD-(L)1(全身治疗组)或TACE联合MTT + PD-(L)1(联合治疗组)HCC患者的资料。主要结果是治疗开始后初始评估时的客观反应率(ORR)。次要结局包括进展自由生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和3级或以上不良事件。结果:共纳入222例HCC患者(全身治疗组109例,联合治疗组113例)。倾向评分匹配每组产生80例患者。联合治疗组ORR的优势比为1.29 (95% CI: 0.64-2.60;p = 0.479)。亚组分析显示,AFP≤200 ng/mL患者联合治疗组的ORR显著高于联合治疗组(OR=3.54, p=0.016)。对于无PVTT的患者,联合治疗的ORR几率略高(OR=5.33, p=0.068)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,两组患者PFS (HR=0.68, p=0.131)和OS (HR=0.86, p=0.674)差异无统计学意义。基线AFP (200 ng/mL)越高,PFS (HR=1.68, p=0.012)和OS (HR=2.33, p=0.021)越差。手术切除可改善PFS (HR=0.42, p)结论:TACE联合MTT和PD-(L)1治疗不可切除的HCC患者无明显疗效。然而,对于AFP≤200ng /mL或无PVTT的患者,TACE可能具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Molecular Targeted Therapy Plus PD-(L)1 with or without TACE in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Molecular Targeted Therapy Plus PD-(L)1 with or without TACE in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Molecular Targeted Therapy Plus PD-(L)1 with or without TACE in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Molecular Targeted Therapy Plus PD-(L)1 with or without TACE in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of TACE combined with molecular targeted therapy (MTT) plus Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) antibodies versus MTT plus PD-(L)1 antibodies for HCC patients.

Methods: Data from HCC patients who received either MTT plus PD-(L)1 (systemic therapy group) or TACE combined with MTT plus PD-(L)1 (combination therapy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the objective reaction rate (ORR) at the initial assessment post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included progressive free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and grade-3 or higher adverse events.

Results: A total of 222 HCC patients were included (109 in the systemic therapy group, 113 in the combination therapy group). Propensity score matching yielded 80 patients per group. The odds ratio for ORR in the combination therapy group was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.64-2.60; p=0.479). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher ORR for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL in the combination therapy group (OR=3.54, p=0.016). For patients without PVTT, the ORR odds were slightly higher with combination therapy (OR=5.33, p=0.068). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant differences in PFS (HR=0.68, p=0.131) or OS (HR=0.86, p=0.674) between the two groups. Higher baseline AFP (>200 ng/mL) was associated with worse PFS (HR=1.68, p=0.012) and OS (HR=2.33, p=0.021). Surgical resection improved PFS (HR=0.42, p<0.001) and OS (HR=0.31, p=0.004). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common in the combination therapy group (52% vs 15%, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: No significant benefits were observed for combining TACE with MTT and PD-(L)1 in unresectable HCC patients. However, TACE may offer advantages for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL or without PVTT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Immuno Targets and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on the immunological basis of diseases, potential targets for immune based therapy and treatment protocols employed to improve patient management. Basic immunology and physiology of the immune system in health, and disease will be also covered.In addition, the journal will focus on the impact of management programs and new therapeutic agents and protocols on patient perspectives such as quality of life, adherence and satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信