在接受抗vegf治疗的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中持续与间歇使用泪液代用品:TREDIA研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Héloïse Torres-Villaros, Audrey Giocanti-Aurégan, Serge Doan, Emilie Agard, Jérémy Billant, Nathalie Arbousoff, Benjamin Matagrin, Inès Fenniri, Corinne Dot
{"title":"在接受抗vegf治疗的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中持续与间歇使用泪液代用品:TREDIA研究","authors":"Héloïse Torres-Villaros, Audrey Giocanti-Aurégan, Serge Doan, Emilie Agard, Jérémy Billant, Nathalie Arbousoff, Benjamin Matagrin, Inès Fenniri, Corinne Dot","doi":"10.1007/s40123-025-01201-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this prospective randomized bicenter study was to compare the effects of continuous versus intermittent use of tear substitutes on the ocular surface and dry eye symptoms in patients receiving repeated and frequent intravitreal injections (IVIs) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with nAMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for more than 1 year at 4-8-week intervals were included. The intermittent treatment group received standard 1.5% povidone artificial tears for three days after each IVI, while the continuous treatment group received an ophthalmic lubricant emulsion with 0.18% sodium hyaluronate four times a day throughout the study. The primary endpoint was the mean change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score between baseline and the day of the fourth IVI. Secondary endpoints included the Schirmer test score, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Oxford staining score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients with mean age of 83.1 ± 6.0 years who had previously received a mean number of 28.5 ± 20.3 IVIs were included. The mean OSDI score change from baseline was -6.6 ± 13.5 points in the continuous treatment group versus +0.6 ± 13.7 points in the intermittent treatment group (p = 0.04). No significant differences in Schirmer test score, TBUT, and Oxford score were found between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous use of tear substitutes in patients with nAMD receiving repeated and frequent IVIs could be beneficial in improving dry eye symptoms, as shown by a significant improvement in OSDI scores in our study, despite no substantial changes in other ocular surface metrics.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06174181.</p>","PeriodicalId":19623,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous versus Intermittent Use of Tear Substitutes in Patients Treated with Anti-VEGF for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The TREDIA Study.\",\"authors\":\"Héloïse Torres-Villaros, Audrey Giocanti-Aurégan, Serge Doan, Emilie Agard, Jérémy Billant, Nathalie Arbousoff, Benjamin Matagrin, Inès Fenniri, Corinne Dot\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40123-025-01201-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this prospective randomized bicenter study was to compare the effects of continuous versus intermittent use of tear substitutes on the ocular surface and dry eye symptoms in patients receiving repeated and frequent intravitreal injections (IVIs) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with nAMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for more than 1 year at 4-8-week intervals were included. The intermittent treatment group received standard 1.5% povidone artificial tears for three days after each IVI, while the continuous treatment group received an ophthalmic lubricant emulsion with 0.18% sodium hyaluronate four times a day throughout the study. The primary endpoint was the mean change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score between baseline and the day of the fourth IVI. Secondary endpoints included the Schirmer test score, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Oxford staining score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients with mean age of 83.1 ± 6.0 years who had previously received a mean number of 28.5 ± 20.3 IVIs were included. The mean OSDI score change from baseline was -6.6 ± 13.5 points in the continuous treatment group versus +0.6 ± 13.7 points in the intermittent treatment group (p = 0.04). No significant differences in Schirmer test score, TBUT, and Oxford score were found between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous use of tear substitutes in patients with nAMD receiving repeated and frequent IVIs could be beneficial in improving dry eye symptoms, as shown by a significant improvement in OSDI scores in our study, despite no substantial changes in other ocular surface metrics.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06174181.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01201-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01201-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这项前瞻性随机双中心研究的目的是比较连续和间歇使用泪液代用品对接受反复和频繁玻璃体内注射(IVIs)治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)患者眼表和干眼症状的影响。方法:纳入接受抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗1年以上的nAMD患者,每隔4-8周进行一次治疗。间歇治疗组在每次IVI后给予标准1.5%聚维酮人工泪液3天,而连续治疗组在整个研究过程中每天给予含0.18%透明质酸钠的眼润滑乳液4次。主要终点是眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分从基线到第四次IVI当天的平均变化。次要终点包括Schirmer测试评分、泪液破裂时间(TBUT)和牛津染色评分。结果:纳入65例患者,平均年龄83.1±6.0岁,既往平均静脉注射次数28.5±20.3次。连续治疗组OSDI评分较基线平均变化为-6.6±13.5分,间歇治疗组为+0.6±13.7分(p = 0.04)。两组间Schirmer测试、TBUT、Oxford评分均无显著差异。结论:在接受反复和频繁静脉注射的nAMD患者中,持续使用泪液代用品可能有利于改善干眼症状,正如我们的研究中OSDI评分的显著改善所显示的那样,尽管其他眼表指标没有实质性变化。试验注册号:NCT06174181。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous versus Intermittent Use of Tear Substitutes in Patients Treated with Anti-VEGF for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The TREDIA Study.

Introduction: The aim of this prospective randomized bicenter study was to compare the effects of continuous versus intermittent use of tear substitutes on the ocular surface and dry eye symptoms in patients receiving repeated and frequent intravitreal injections (IVIs) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods: Patients with nAMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for more than 1 year at 4-8-week intervals were included. The intermittent treatment group received standard 1.5% povidone artificial tears for three days after each IVI, while the continuous treatment group received an ophthalmic lubricant emulsion with 0.18% sodium hyaluronate four times a day throughout the study. The primary endpoint was the mean change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score between baseline and the day of the fourth IVI. Secondary endpoints included the Schirmer test score, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Oxford staining score.

Results: Sixty-five patients with mean age of 83.1 ± 6.0 years who had previously received a mean number of 28.5 ± 20.3 IVIs were included. The mean OSDI score change from baseline was -6.6 ± 13.5 points in the continuous treatment group versus +0.6 ± 13.7 points in the intermittent treatment group (p = 0.04). No significant differences in Schirmer test score, TBUT, and Oxford score were found between the groups.

Conclusions: Continuous use of tear substitutes in patients with nAMD receiving repeated and frequent IVIs could be beneficial in improving dry eye symptoms, as shown by a significant improvement in OSDI scores in our study, despite no substantial changes in other ocular surface metrics.

Trial registration number: NCT06174181.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ophthalmology and Therapy OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Ophthalmology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from preclinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of ophthalmological therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Ophthalmology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of ophthalmic therapies. Open Access All articles published by Ophthalmology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Ophthalmology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Ophthalmology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信