血管外科学会和胸外科学会新分类对急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层的影响。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Yuki Ikeno, Akiko Tanaka, Michael J Troncone, Ezra Y Koh, Adrian Ramirez, Muhammad Arbaz Khan, Harleen Sandhu, Charles C Miller, Hazim J Safi, Anthony L Estrera
{"title":"血管外科学会和胸外科学会新分类对急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层的影响。","authors":"Yuki Ikeno, Akiko Tanaka, Michael J Troncone, Ezra Y Koh, Adrian Ramirez, Muhammad Arbaz Khan, Harleen Sandhu, Charles C Miller, Hazim J Safi, Anthony L Estrera","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.07.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Stanford classification categorizes aortic dissection based on ascending aortic involvement, whereas the newer Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS/STS) classification emphasizes tear location. Thus, traditional Stanford type A dissection may be an SVS/STS type A dissection or SVS/STS type B0 dissection. We evaluated the impact of SVS/STS classification on perioperative characteristics and outcomes after acute Stanford type A dissection repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 794 patients undergoing acute Stanford type A dissection repair between January 1999 and March 2025, excluding those with unidentified entry tears (SVS/STS type I). Perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between SVS/STS type A (n=632) and type B0 (n=162).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SVS/STS type B0 patients had lower rates of malperfusion and hypotension but larger arch, descending, and abdominal aortic diameters. Operative mortality was similar between groups (13.9% vs. 14.8%, P=0.778). Long-term survival did not differ significantly (10-year survival: 59.3% vs. 54.5%, P=0.277). However, freedom from distal aortic reintervention was significantly lower in the SVS/STS type B0 group (76.2% vs. 65.3% at 10 years, P=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SVS/STS classification identifies distinct subgroups within Stanford type A dissection. SVS/STS type B0 dissections present with more stable hemodynamics but larger aortic dimensions and higher distal reintervention rates. This classification provides valuable prognostic information for both early and late outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of new classification from the Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons on acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Ikeno, Akiko Tanaka, Michael J Troncone, Ezra Y Koh, Adrian Ramirez, Muhammad Arbaz Khan, Harleen Sandhu, Charles C Miller, Hazim J Safi, Anthony L Estrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.07.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Stanford classification categorizes aortic dissection based on ascending aortic involvement, whereas the newer Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS/STS) classification emphasizes tear location. Thus, traditional Stanford type A dissection may be an SVS/STS type A dissection or SVS/STS type B0 dissection. We evaluated the impact of SVS/STS classification on perioperative characteristics and outcomes after acute Stanford type A dissection repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 794 patients undergoing acute Stanford type A dissection repair between January 1999 and March 2025, excluding those with unidentified entry tears (SVS/STS type I). Perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between SVS/STS type A (n=632) and type B0 (n=162).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SVS/STS type B0 patients had lower rates of malperfusion and hypotension but larger arch, descending, and abdominal aortic diameters. Operative mortality was similar between groups (13.9% vs. 14.8%, P=0.778). Long-term survival did not differ significantly (10-year survival: 59.3% vs. 54.5%, P=0.277). However, freedom from distal aortic reintervention was significantly lower in the SVS/STS type B0 group (76.2% vs. 65.3% at 10 years, P=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SVS/STS classification identifies distinct subgroups within Stanford type A dissection. SVS/STS type B0 dissections present with more stable hemodynamics but larger aortic dimensions and higher distal reintervention rates. This classification provides valuable prognostic information for both early and late outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.07.023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.07.023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Stanford分类法根据升主动脉受累程度对主动脉夹层进行分类,而较新的血管外科学会/胸外科学会(SVS/STS)分类法强调撕裂位置。因此,传统的Stanford A型夹层可能是SVS/STS A型夹层或SVS/STS B0型夹层。我们评估SVS/STS分型对急性Stanford A型夹层修复术后围手术期特征和预后的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了1999年1月至2025年3月期间794例接受急性Stanford A型夹层修复的患者,不包括未识别的进入性撕裂(SVS/STS I型)。比较SVS/STS A型(n=632)和B0型(n=162)围手术期变量和结果。结果:SVS/STS B0型患者的灌注不良和低血压发生率较低,但弓、降主动脉和腹主动脉直径较大。两组手术死亡率相似(13.9% vs. 14.8%, P=0.778)。长期生存率无显著差异(10年生存率:59.3% vs. 54.5%, P=0.277)。然而,在SVS/STS B0型组中,远端主动脉再介入的自由度明显较低(10年时76.2%比65.3%,P=0.008)。结论:SVS/STS分类在Stanford A型夹层中确定了不同的亚群。SVS/STS B0型夹层血流动力学更稳定,但主动脉尺寸更大,远端再介入率更高。这种分类为早期和晚期预后提供了有价值的预后信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of new classification from the Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons on acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Objectives: The Stanford classification categorizes aortic dissection based on ascending aortic involvement, whereas the newer Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS/STS) classification emphasizes tear location. Thus, traditional Stanford type A dissection may be an SVS/STS type A dissection or SVS/STS type B0 dissection. We evaluated the impact of SVS/STS classification on perioperative characteristics and outcomes after acute Stanford type A dissection repair.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 794 patients undergoing acute Stanford type A dissection repair between January 1999 and March 2025, excluding those with unidentified entry tears (SVS/STS type I). Perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between SVS/STS type A (n=632) and type B0 (n=162).

Results: SVS/STS type B0 patients had lower rates of malperfusion and hypotension but larger arch, descending, and abdominal aortic diameters. Operative mortality was similar between groups (13.9% vs. 14.8%, P=0.778). Long-term survival did not differ significantly (10-year survival: 59.3% vs. 54.5%, P=0.277). However, freedom from distal aortic reintervention was significantly lower in the SVS/STS type B0 group (76.2% vs. 65.3% at 10 years, P=0.008).

Conclusion: The SVS/STS classification identifies distinct subgroups within Stanford type A dissection. SVS/STS type B0 dissections present with more stable hemodynamics but larger aortic dimensions and higher distal reintervention rates. This classification provides valuable prognostic information for both early and late outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信