辅助肝动脉输注化疗与经动脉化疗栓塞预防肝癌术后早期复发的比较。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-07-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S510814
Yangshuo Xia, Wu Wen, Yangyu Liao, Yingxiao Cai, Renhua Wan
{"title":"辅助肝动脉输注化疗与经动脉化疗栓塞预防肝癌术后早期复发的比较。","authors":"Yangshuo Xia, Wu Wen, Yangyu Liao, Yingxiao Cai, Renhua Wan","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S510814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>HCC exhibits a high postoperative recurrence rate, with early recurrence (≤2 years) accounting for 70% of cases, predominantly associated with high-risk recurrence factors. Common adjuvant therapies for HCC include postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC) and postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE). This study evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of PA-HAIC versus PA-TACE in preventing early recurrence among HCC patients with postoperative high-risk recurrence factors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 170 HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors following surgical resection (2018-2023), divided into PA-HAIC (n=23) and PA-TACE (n=147) groups. To mitigate potential biases and adjust for baseline characteristics, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Survival analyses for two primary endpoints, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were then conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Adverse event (AE) rates and severity were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-PSM analysis revealed significantly superior RFS rates in the PA-HAIC group versus PA-TACE at 6,12,and 24 months (100%, 95.7%, 95.7% vs 91.3%, 73.9%, 65.2%;p=0.0085). Multivariable Cox regression identified PA-HAIC (HR=0.20, 95% CI:0.02-0.71;p=0.020) and intact tumor capsule (HR=0.02, 95% CI:0.00-0.41;p=0.011) as independent protective factors for RFS, while vascular tumor thrombus (HR=28.02, 95% CI:2.07-378.81;p=0.012) emerged as a risk factor. Subgroup analyses identified age ≥50 years, solitary tumors, BCLC-A stage, absence of MVI, intact capsule, and no vascular thrombus as low-risk factors for early recurrence. Safety profiles showed no significant between-group differences in AE incidence or severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors after surgical resection, PA-HAIC demonstrated significantly prolonged RFS compared to PA-TACE, with a favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"1425-1439"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Preventing Early Recurrence After Surgical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Yangshuo Xia, Wu Wen, Yangyu Liao, Yingxiao Cai, Renhua Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JHC.S510814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>HCC exhibits a high postoperative recurrence rate, with early recurrence (≤2 years) accounting for 70% of cases, predominantly associated with high-risk recurrence factors. Common adjuvant therapies for HCC include postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC) and postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE). This study evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of PA-HAIC versus PA-TACE in preventing early recurrence among HCC patients with postoperative high-risk recurrence factors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 170 HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors following surgical resection (2018-2023), divided into PA-HAIC (n=23) and PA-TACE (n=147) groups. To mitigate potential biases and adjust for baseline characteristics, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Survival analyses for two primary endpoints, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were then conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Adverse event (AE) rates and severity were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-PSM analysis revealed significantly superior RFS rates in the PA-HAIC group versus PA-TACE at 6,12,and 24 months (100%, 95.7%, 95.7% vs 91.3%, 73.9%, 65.2%;p=0.0085). Multivariable Cox regression identified PA-HAIC (HR=0.20, 95% CI:0.02-0.71;p=0.020) and intact tumor capsule (HR=0.02, 95% CI:0.00-0.41;p=0.011) as independent protective factors for RFS, while vascular tumor thrombus (HR=28.02, 95% CI:2.07-378.81;p=0.012) emerged as a risk factor. Subgroup analyses identified age ≥50 years, solitary tumors, BCLC-A stage, absence of MVI, intact capsule, and no vascular thrombus as low-risk factors for early recurrence. Safety profiles showed no significant between-group differences in AE incidence or severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors after surgical resection, PA-HAIC demonstrated significantly prolonged RFS compared to PA-TACE, with a favorable safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1425-1439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S510814\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S510814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:HCC术后复发率高,早期复发率(≤2年)占70%,主要与高危复发因素相关。HCC常见的辅助治疗包括术后辅助肝动脉输注化疗(PA-HAIC)和术后辅助经动脉化疗栓塞(PA-TACE)。本研究评估了PA-HAIC与PA-TACE在预防术后高危复发因素的HCC患者早期复发中的比较疗效和安全性。患者和方法:回顾性分析170例手术切除后具有高危复发因素的HCC患者(2018-2023年),分为PA-HAIC组(n=23)和PA-TACE组(n=147)。为了减轻潜在的偏差和调整基线特征,进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)。然后使用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险回归对无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)这两个主要终点进行生存分析。比较不良事件(AE)发生率和严重程度。结果:psm后分析显示,PA-HAIC组在6、12和24个月的RFS率显著优于PA-TACE组(100%、95.7%、95.7% vs 91.3%、73.9%、65.2%;p=0.0085)。多变量Cox回归发现PA-HAIC (HR=0.20, 95% CI:0.02 ~ 0.71, p=0.020)和完整的肿瘤包膜(HR=0.02, 95% CI:0.00 ~ 0.41, p=0.011)是RFS的独立保护因素,而血管肿瘤血栓(HR=28.02, 95% CI:2.07 ~ 378.81, p=0.012)是RFS的危险因素。亚组分析发现,年龄≥50岁、孤立性肿瘤、BCLC-A分期、MVI缺失、囊膜完整、无血管血栓是早期复发的低危险因素。安全性资料显示,两组间AE的发生率或严重程度无显著差异。结论:在手术切除后有高危复发因素的HCC患者中,与PA-TACE相比,PA-HAIC可显著延长RFS,且具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Preventing Early Recurrence After Surgical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Preventing Early Recurrence After Surgical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Preventing Early Recurrence After Surgical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Preventing Early Recurrence After Surgical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Purpose: HCC exhibits a high postoperative recurrence rate, with early recurrence (≤2 years) accounting for 70% of cases, predominantly associated with high-risk recurrence factors. Common adjuvant therapies for HCC include postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC) and postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE). This study evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of PA-HAIC versus PA-TACE in preventing early recurrence among HCC patients with postoperative high-risk recurrence factors.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis included 170 HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors following surgical resection (2018-2023), divided into PA-HAIC (n=23) and PA-TACE (n=147) groups. To mitigate potential biases and adjust for baseline characteristics, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Survival analyses for two primary endpoints, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were then conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Adverse event (AE) rates and severity were compared.

Results: Post-PSM analysis revealed significantly superior RFS rates in the PA-HAIC group versus PA-TACE at 6,12,and 24 months (100%, 95.7%, 95.7% vs 91.3%, 73.9%, 65.2%;p=0.0085). Multivariable Cox regression identified PA-HAIC (HR=0.20, 95% CI:0.02-0.71;p=0.020) and intact tumor capsule (HR=0.02, 95% CI:0.00-0.41;p=0.011) as independent protective factors for RFS, while vascular tumor thrombus (HR=28.02, 95% CI:2.07-378.81;p=0.012) emerged as a risk factor. Subgroup analyses identified age ≥50 years, solitary tumors, BCLC-A stage, absence of MVI, intact capsule, and no vascular thrombus as low-risk factors for early recurrence. Safety profiles showed no significant between-group differences in AE incidence or severity.

Conclusion: Among HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors after surgical resection, PA-HAIC demonstrated significantly prolonged RFS compared to PA-TACE, with a favorable safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信