{"title":"EGFR-TKI失败后egfr -突变型NSCLC化疗免疫疗法批准前后的实际治疗结果:一项日本队列研究","authors":"Kenji Morimoto, Tadaaki Yamada, Naoki Furuya, Hisashi Tanaka, Akihiro Yoshimura, Tomohiro Oba, Makoto Hibino, Takahito Fukuda, Yasuhiro Goto, Akira Nakao, Shinsuke Ogusu, Yuta Okazaki, Taishi Harada, Takayo Ota, Ken Masubuchi, Koji Mikami, Tae Hata, Shoki Matsumoto, Ryoichi Honda, Koji Date, Yusuke Chihara, Koichi Takayama","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02837-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, chemoimmunotherapy was approved as treatment for advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, in December 2018. However, the impact of its approval on real-world clinical outcomes among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess that impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received platinum-based cancer therapy after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at 20 institutions in Japan from January 2017 to July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 120 (27.2%) patients before the chemoimmunotherapy approval and 321 (72.8%) after. Overall, no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were observed between the pre- and post-approval groups (p = 0.72 and p = 0.89, respectively). In the subgroup with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%, the post-approval group had a significantly longer PFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.048) than the pre-approval group. In contrast, in the PD-L1 < 50% cohort, no significant differences in the PFS (p = 0.54) or OS (p = 0.75) were noted between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The approval of chemoimmunotherapy did not affect treatment outcomes among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received platinum-based therapy after EGFR-TKIs. However, patients with high levels of PD-L1 expression had improved outcomes post-approval, suggesting potential benefits in this subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1963-1971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment outcomes before and after chemoimmunotherapy approval in EGFR-mutant NSCLC after EGFR-TKI failure: a Japanese cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Morimoto, Tadaaki Yamada, Naoki Furuya, Hisashi Tanaka, Akihiro Yoshimura, Tomohiro Oba, Makoto Hibino, Takahito Fukuda, Yasuhiro Goto, Akira Nakao, Shinsuke Ogusu, Yuta Okazaki, Taishi Harada, Takayo Ota, Ken Masubuchi, Koji Mikami, Tae Hata, Shoki Matsumoto, Ryoichi Honda, Koji Date, Yusuke Chihara, Koichi Takayama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02837-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, chemoimmunotherapy was approved as treatment for advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, in December 2018. However, the impact of its approval on real-world clinical outcomes among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess that impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received platinum-based cancer therapy after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at 20 institutions in Japan from January 2017 to July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 120 (27.2%) patients before the chemoimmunotherapy approval and 321 (72.8%) after. Overall, no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were observed between the pre- and post-approval groups (p = 0.72 and p = 0.89, respectively). In the subgroup with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%, the post-approval group had a significantly longer PFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.048) than the pre-approval group. In contrast, in the PD-L1 < 50% cohort, no significant differences in the PFS (p = 0.54) or OS (p = 0.75) were noted between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The approval of chemoimmunotherapy did not affect treatment outcomes among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received platinum-based therapy after EGFR-TKIs. However, patients with high levels of PD-L1 expression had improved outcomes post-approval, suggesting potential benefits in this subgroup.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1963-1971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02837-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02837-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world treatment outcomes before and after chemoimmunotherapy approval in EGFR-mutant NSCLC after EGFR-TKI failure: a Japanese cohort study.
Background: In Japan, chemoimmunotherapy was approved as treatment for advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, in December 2018. However, the impact of its approval on real-world clinical outcomes among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess that impact.
Methods: We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received platinum-based cancer therapy after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at 20 institutions in Japan from January 2017 to July 2022.
Results: We evaluated 120 (27.2%) patients before the chemoimmunotherapy approval and 321 (72.8%) after. Overall, no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were observed between the pre- and post-approval groups (p = 0.72 and p = 0.89, respectively). In the subgroup with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%, the post-approval group had a significantly longer PFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.048) than the pre-approval group. In contrast, in the PD-L1 < 50% cohort, no significant differences in the PFS (p = 0.54) or OS (p = 0.75) were noted between the groups.
Conclusions: The approval of chemoimmunotherapy did not affect treatment outcomes among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received platinum-based therapy after EGFR-TKIs. However, patients with high levels of PD-L1 expression had improved outcomes post-approval, suggesting potential benefits in this subgroup.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.