十二指肠肿瘤的当前处理。大SNADET的内镜治疗。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestion Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1159/000547461
Kurato Miyazaki, Naohisa Yahagi, Motohiko Kato
{"title":"十二指肠肿瘤的当前处理。大SNADET的内镜治疗。","authors":"Kurato Miyazaki, Naohisa Yahagi, Motohiko Kato","doi":"10.1159/000547461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) were previously considered rare. However, the widespread use of health checkup endoscopy, improvements in endoscopic imaging and heightened awareness of SNADETs among endoscopists have recently led to an increase in their detection rate. Particularly for large SNADETs, the possibility of including cancer must be considered, and thus, complete and reliable resection is essential. Although surgical resection has traditionally been the standard treatment, its high invasiveness has led to increased interest in less invasive endoscopic treatments. Nevertheless, due to the unique anatomical and physiological features of the duodenum, endoscopic treatment in the duodenum remains highly challenging and presents many technical difficulties.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive overview of current endoscopic treatment options for large SNADETs, including conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR), underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR), cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery, incorporating the latest clinical findings. While C-EMR, U-EMR, and CS-EMR are associated with lower technical difficulty and favorable safety, they tend to show lower en bloc resection rates and higher recurrence rates for large SNADETs when compared to ESD. In contrast, ESD offers higher en bloc resection rates but carries a greater risk of complications due to its technical complexity. To overcome these limitations, several techniques have been developed, such as the pocket-creation method, water pressure method, improved closure strategies for mucosal defects, and drainage with endoscopic nasobiliary and pancreatic drainage to prevent exposure to pancreatic juice and bile.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Multiple endoscopic strategies are available for the treatment of large SNADETs. However, due to the rarity of the disease and variation in institutional expertise, a standardized treatment strategy has not yet been established. Endoscopic treatment for large SNADETs is technically very challenging and carries a high risk. Therefore, careful consideration of the indication for each treatment method, along with a full understanding of their respective advantages and disadvantages, is essential. In recent years, the safety of endoscopic resection has been gradually improving due to various technical innovations and better management of adverse events, making ESD, which offers a high en bloc resection rate, an increasingly reasonable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Management of Duodenal Neoplasia: Endoscopic Treatment for Large Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Kurato Miyazaki, Naohisa Yahagi, Motohiko Kato\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) were previously considered rare. However, the widespread use of health checkup endoscopy, improvements in endoscopic imaging and heightened awareness of SNADETs among endoscopists have recently led to an increase in their detection rate. Particularly for large SNADETs, the possibility of including cancer must be considered, and thus, complete and reliable resection is essential. Although surgical resection has traditionally been the standard treatment, its high invasiveness has led to increased interest in less invasive endoscopic treatments. Nevertheless, due to the unique anatomical and physiological features of the duodenum, endoscopic treatment in the duodenum remains highly challenging and presents many technical difficulties.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive overview of current endoscopic treatment options for large SNADETs, including conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR), underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR), cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery, incorporating the latest clinical findings. While C-EMR, U-EMR, and CS-EMR are associated with lower technical difficulty and favorable safety, they tend to show lower en bloc resection rates and higher recurrence rates for large SNADETs when compared to ESD. In contrast, ESD offers higher en bloc resection rates but carries a greater risk of complications due to its technical complexity. To overcome these limitations, several techniques have been developed, such as the pocket-creation method, water pressure method, improved closure strategies for mucosal defects, and drainage with endoscopic nasobiliary and pancreatic drainage to prevent exposure to pancreatic juice and bile.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Multiple endoscopic strategies are available for the treatment of large SNADETs. However, due to the rarity of the disease and variation in institutional expertise, a standardized treatment strategy has not yet been established. Endoscopic treatment for large SNADETs is technically very challenging and carries a high risk. Therefore, careful consideration of the indication for each treatment method, along with a full understanding of their respective advantages and disadvantages, is essential. In recent years, the safety of endoscopic resection has been gradually improving due to various technical innovations and better management of adverse events, making ESD, which offers a high en bloc resection rate, an increasingly reasonable treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547461\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景浅表性非壶腹性十二指肠上皮肿瘤(SNADETs)以前被认为是罕见的。然而,健康检查内窥镜的广泛使用,内窥镜成像的改进以及内窥镜医师对snadet的认识的提高,最近导致其检出率增加。特别是对于大的snadet,必须考虑包括癌症的可能性,因此完全可靠的切除是必不可少的。虽然手术切除传统上是标准的治疗方法,但其高侵入性导致人们对微创内镜治疗的兴趣增加。然而,由于十二指肠独特的解剖和生理特征,十二指肠的内镜治疗仍然极具挑战性,存在许多技术困难。本文综述了目前大型snadet的内镜治疗方案,包括常规内镜粘膜切除术(C-EMR)、水下内镜粘膜切除术(U-EMR)、冷陷阱内镜粘膜切除术(CS-EMR)、内镜粘膜下剥离术(ESD)和腹腔镜-内镜合作手术(LECS),并结合最新临床发现。虽然C-EMR、U-EMR和CS-EMR具有较低的技术难度和良好的安全性,但与ESD相比,它们往往显示出较低的整体切除率和较高的复发率。相比之下,ESD提供了更高的整体切除率,但由于其技术复杂性,并发症的风险更大。为了克服这些限制,已经开发了几种技术,如口袋创造法,水压法,改进的粘膜缺陷闭合策略,以及内窥镜鼻胆管和胰腺引流以防止暴露胰液和胆汁。多种内镜策略可用于治疗大型snadet。然而,由于这种疾病的罕见性和机构专业知识的差异,尚未建立标准化的治疗策略。内窥镜治疗大型snadet在技术上非常具有挑战性,而且风险很高。因此,仔细考虑每种治疗方法的适应症,并充分了解其各自的优缺点是至关重要的。近年来,由于各种技术创新和不良事件管理的改善,内镜下切除术的安全性逐渐提高,使得具有高全切率的ESD成为越来越合理的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Management of Duodenal Neoplasia: Endoscopic Treatment for Large Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor.

Background: Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) were previously considered rare. However, the widespread use of health checkup endoscopy, improvements in endoscopic imaging and heightened awareness of SNADETs among endoscopists have recently led to an increase in their detection rate. Particularly for large SNADETs, the possibility of including cancer must be considered, and thus, complete and reliable resection is essential. Although surgical resection has traditionally been the standard treatment, its high invasiveness has led to increased interest in less invasive endoscopic treatments. Nevertheless, due to the unique anatomical and physiological features of the duodenum, endoscopic treatment in the duodenum remains highly challenging and presents many technical difficulties.

Summary: This review provides a comprehensive overview of current endoscopic treatment options for large SNADETs, including conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR), underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR), cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery, incorporating the latest clinical findings. While C-EMR, U-EMR, and CS-EMR are associated with lower technical difficulty and favorable safety, they tend to show lower en bloc resection rates and higher recurrence rates for large SNADETs when compared to ESD. In contrast, ESD offers higher en bloc resection rates but carries a greater risk of complications due to its technical complexity. To overcome these limitations, several techniques have been developed, such as the pocket-creation method, water pressure method, improved closure strategies for mucosal defects, and drainage with endoscopic nasobiliary and pancreatic drainage to prevent exposure to pancreatic juice and bile.

Key messages: Multiple endoscopic strategies are available for the treatment of large SNADETs. However, due to the rarity of the disease and variation in institutional expertise, a standardized treatment strategy has not yet been established. Endoscopic treatment for large SNADETs is technically very challenging and carries a high risk. Therefore, careful consideration of the indication for each treatment method, along with a full understanding of their respective advantages and disadvantages, is essential. In recent years, the safety of endoscopic resection has been gradually improving due to various technical innovations and better management of adverse events, making ESD, which offers a high en bloc resection rate, an increasingly reasonable treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信