自动婴儿眼动追踪:一个系统的历史回顾

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Infancy Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1111/infa.70031
Pär Nyström, Andrea Nesa Ziavras, Tekle Makashvili, Amelia Juslin, Venla Lehtonen, Amanda Riis, Gustaf Gredebäck
{"title":"自动婴儿眼动追踪:一个系统的历史回顾","authors":"Pär Nyström,&nbsp;Andrea Nesa Ziavras,&nbsp;Tekle Makashvili,&nbsp;Amelia Juslin,&nbsp;Venla Lehtonen,&nbsp;Amanda Riis,&nbsp;Gustaf Gredebäck","doi":"10.1111/infa.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Automated eye tracking has emerged as a powerful method in psychology, and has special benefits when studying infant populations. The field has developed much during the last decades, and while there are numerous reviews on methodological aspects and specific research topics, a general overview of the state and trends of the field has been lacking. That lack leaves the field unguided on several important aspects such as WEIRDness, statistical power and replication issues, unexploited areas of research, and the current status of the field as a whole. We here conducted a systematic review of the complete peer-reviewed English literature on automated eye tracking with children during their first two years of life (793 articles), and extracted dates of publication, author and population geographic affiliation, keywords and sample sizes. The results show that automated eye tracking in infant research is increasingly used, and is accompanied by larger sample sizes, which together suggests improved accessibility. There is a focus on WEIRD populations, and a few broad research topics (methods, language and attention) and specific topics (autism, faces) are dominating the field. The current focus leaves many areas of research understudied, yielding a large potential for more infant eye tracking in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Infant Eye Tracking: A Systematic Historical Review\",\"authors\":\"Pär Nyström,&nbsp;Andrea Nesa Ziavras,&nbsp;Tekle Makashvili,&nbsp;Amelia Juslin,&nbsp;Venla Lehtonen,&nbsp;Amanda Riis,&nbsp;Gustaf Gredebäck\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/infa.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Automated eye tracking has emerged as a powerful method in psychology, and has special benefits when studying infant populations. The field has developed much during the last decades, and while there are numerous reviews on methodological aspects and specific research topics, a general overview of the state and trends of the field has been lacking. That lack leaves the field unguided on several important aspects such as WEIRDness, statistical power and replication issues, unexploited areas of research, and the current status of the field as a whole. We here conducted a systematic review of the complete peer-reviewed English literature on automated eye tracking with children during their first two years of life (793 articles), and extracted dates of publication, author and population geographic affiliation, keywords and sample sizes. The results show that automated eye tracking in infant research is increasingly used, and is accompanied by larger sample sizes, which together suggests improved accessibility. There is a focus on WEIRD populations, and a few broad research topics (methods, language and attention) and specific topics (autism, faces) are dominating the field. The current focus leaves many areas of research understudied, yielding a large potential for more infant eye tracking in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infancy\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.70031\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.70031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动眼动追踪已经成为心理学中一种强有力的方法,在研究婴儿群体时具有特殊的好处。在过去的几十年里,该领域已经发展了很多,虽然有许多关于方法方面和具体研究主题的评论,但对该领域的状态和趋势的总体概述一直缺乏。这种缺乏使得该领域在一些重要方面缺乏指导,如怪异性、统计能力和复制问题、未开发的研究领域以及该领域的整体现状。在这里,我们系统地回顾了同行评议的关于儿童两岁前自动眼动追踪的完整英文文献(793篇),并提取了出版日期、作者和人口地理关系、关键词和样本量。结果表明,自动眼动追踪在婴儿研究中的应用越来越多,并且伴随着更大的样本量,这些都表明了可访问性的提高。有一个重点是WEIRD人群,一些广泛的研究主题(方法,语言和注意力)和特定的主题(自闭症,面孔)在这个领域占据主导地位。目前的焦点使许多研究领域未得到充分研究,这为未来更多的婴儿眼动追踪提供了巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Automated Infant Eye Tracking: A Systematic Historical Review

Automated Infant Eye Tracking: A Systematic Historical Review

Automated eye tracking has emerged as a powerful method in psychology, and has special benefits when studying infant populations. The field has developed much during the last decades, and while there are numerous reviews on methodological aspects and specific research topics, a general overview of the state and trends of the field has been lacking. That lack leaves the field unguided on several important aspects such as WEIRDness, statistical power and replication issues, unexploited areas of research, and the current status of the field as a whole. We here conducted a systematic review of the complete peer-reviewed English literature on automated eye tracking with children during their first two years of life (793 articles), and extracted dates of publication, author and population geographic affiliation, keywords and sample sizes. The results show that automated eye tracking in infant research is increasingly used, and is accompanied by larger sample sizes, which together suggests improved accessibility. There is a focus on WEIRD populations, and a few broad research topics (methods, language and attention) and specific topics (autism, faces) are dominating the field. The current focus leaves many areas of research understudied, yielding a large potential for more infant eye tracking in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信