{"title":"农业火灾的决定因素:聚合博弈方法","authors":"Wilfredo L. Maldonado, Jessica A. Barbosa","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The effects of deforestation caused by land fires used by farmers (especially smallholders) are twofold. From the individual (farmer) perspective, these burnings contribute to land preparation and improve fertility. On the other hand, at an aggregate level, these practices harm air and water quality, degrade the environment and as a consequence negatively impact land productivity. In this work, we present an aggregative game framework that incorporates these effects, enabling us to analyse how variations in fire costs and the number of farmers—key determinants of agricultural fires—affect the total deforested area. We also demonstrate the pervasive cross-effect of fines imposed on a farmer (or group of farmers) on the burning decisions of others. Additionally, we prove the existence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between fines applied for land fires and total sector production, which allows us to identify an optimal fine value that maximises total output. Finally, using data from Brazilian research institutes, we test the sign and magnitude of the impacts of these determinants on aggregate deforestation in Brazil's Legal Amazon for the period 2008–2021.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 3","pages":"556-565"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Agricultural Fires: An Aggregative Games Approach\",\"authors\":\"Wilfredo L. Maldonado, Jessica A. Barbosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8489.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The effects of deforestation caused by land fires used by farmers (especially smallholders) are twofold. From the individual (farmer) perspective, these burnings contribute to land preparation and improve fertility. On the other hand, at an aggregate level, these practices harm air and water quality, degrade the environment and as a consequence negatively impact land productivity. In this work, we present an aggregative game framework that incorporates these effects, enabling us to analyse how variations in fire costs and the number of farmers—key determinants of agricultural fires—affect the total deforested area. We also demonstrate the pervasive cross-effect of fines imposed on a farmer (or group of farmers) on the burning decisions of others. Additionally, we prove the existence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between fines applied for land fires and total sector production, which allows us to identify an optimal fine value that maximises total output. Finally, using data from Brazilian research institutes, we test the sign and magnitude of the impacts of these determinants on aggregate deforestation in Brazil's Legal Amazon for the period 2008–2021.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics\",\"volume\":\"69 3\",\"pages\":\"556-565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determinants of Agricultural Fires: An Aggregative Games Approach
The effects of deforestation caused by land fires used by farmers (especially smallholders) are twofold. From the individual (farmer) perspective, these burnings contribute to land preparation and improve fertility. On the other hand, at an aggregate level, these practices harm air and water quality, degrade the environment and as a consequence negatively impact land productivity. In this work, we present an aggregative game framework that incorporates these effects, enabling us to analyse how variations in fire costs and the number of farmers—key determinants of agricultural fires—affect the total deforested area. We also demonstrate the pervasive cross-effect of fines imposed on a farmer (or group of farmers) on the burning decisions of others. Additionally, we prove the existence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between fines applied for land fires and total sector production, which allows us to identify an optimal fine value that maximises total output. Finally, using data from Brazilian research institutes, we test the sign and magnitude of the impacts of these determinants on aggregate deforestation in Brazil's Legal Amazon for the period 2008–2021.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals.
Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives:
-To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers.
-In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.