可视化分析中的耦合引导和进步性

IF 2.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
I. Pérez-Messina, M. Angelini, D. Ceneda, C. Tominski, S. Miksch
{"title":"可视化分析中的耦合引导和进步性","authors":"I. Pérez-Messina,&nbsp;M. Angelini,&nbsp;D. Ceneda,&nbsp;C. Tominski,&nbsp;S. Miksch","doi":"10.1111/cgf.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Data size and complexity in Visual Analytics (VA)pose significant challenges for VA systems andVA users. Two recent developments address these challenges: progressive VA (PVA) and guidance for VA (GVA). Both share the goal of supporting the analysis flow. PVA primarily considers the system perspective and incrementally generates partial results during long computations to avoid an unresponsive VA system. GVA is primarily concerned with the user perspective and strives to mitigate knowledge gaps during VA activities to prevent the analysis from stalling. Although PVA and GVA share the same goal, it has not yet been studied how PVA and GVA can join forces to achieve it. Our paper investigates this in detail. We structure our research around two questions: How can guidance enhance PVA and how can progressiveness enhance GVA? This leads to two main themes: Guidance for Progressiveness (G4P) and Progressiveness for Guidance (P4G). By exploring both themes, we arrive at a conceptual model of how progressiveness and guidance can work together. We illustrate the practical value of our theoretical considerations in two case studies ofG4P and P4G.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10687,"journal":{"name":"Computer Graphics Forum","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.70115","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupling Guidance and Progressiveness in Visual Analytics\",\"authors\":\"I. Pérez-Messina,&nbsp;M. Angelini,&nbsp;D. Ceneda,&nbsp;C. Tominski,&nbsp;S. Miksch\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cgf.70115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Data size and complexity in Visual Analytics (VA)pose significant challenges for VA systems andVA users. Two recent developments address these challenges: progressive VA (PVA) and guidance for VA (GVA). Both share the goal of supporting the analysis flow. PVA primarily considers the system perspective and incrementally generates partial results during long computations to avoid an unresponsive VA system. GVA is primarily concerned with the user perspective and strives to mitigate knowledge gaps during VA activities to prevent the analysis from stalling. Although PVA and GVA share the same goal, it has not yet been studied how PVA and GVA can join forces to achieve it. Our paper investigates this in detail. We structure our research around two questions: How can guidance enhance PVA and how can progressiveness enhance GVA? This leads to two main themes: Guidance for Progressiveness (G4P) and Progressiveness for Guidance (P4G). By exploring both themes, we arrive at a conceptual model of how progressiveness and guidance can work together. We illustrate the practical value of our theoretical considerations in two case studies ofG4P and P4G.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.70115\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.70115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Graphics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.70115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可视化分析(VA)中的数据大小和复杂性对VA系统和VA用户提出了重大挑战。最近的两个发展解决了这些挑战:渐进式VA (PVA)和指导式VA (GVA)。两者都有支持分析流的共同目标。PVA主要考虑系统的角度,并在长时间的计算中增量地生成部分结果,以避免无响应的VA系统。GVA主要关注用户视角,并努力减少VA活动期间的知识差距,以防止分析停滞。虽然PVA和GVA具有相同的目标,但尚未研究PVA和GVA如何联合起来实现这一目标。本文对此进行了详细的研究。我们围绕两个问题构建我们的研究:指导如何提高PVA和渐进式如何提高GVA?这导致了两个主要主题:进步性指导(G4P)和进步性指导(P4G)。通过探索这两个主题,我们得出了一个关于进步和指导如何协同工作的概念模型。我们在g4p和P4G的两个案例研究中说明了我们的理论考虑的实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Coupling Guidance and Progressiveness in Visual Analytics

Coupling Guidance and Progressiveness in Visual Analytics

Data size and complexity in Visual Analytics (VA)pose significant challenges for VA systems andVA users. Two recent developments address these challenges: progressive VA (PVA) and guidance for VA (GVA). Both share the goal of supporting the analysis flow. PVA primarily considers the system perspective and incrementally generates partial results during long computations to avoid an unresponsive VA system. GVA is primarily concerned with the user perspective and strives to mitigate knowledge gaps during VA activities to prevent the analysis from stalling. Although PVA and GVA share the same goal, it has not yet been studied how PVA and GVA can join forces to achieve it. Our paper investigates this in detail. We structure our research around two questions: How can guidance enhance PVA and how can progressiveness enhance GVA? This leads to two main themes: Guidance for Progressiveness (G4P) and Progressiveness for Guidance (P4G). By exploring both themes, we arrive at a conceptual model of how progressiveness and guidance can work together. We illustrate the practical value of our theoretical considerations in two case studies ofG4P and P4G.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Graphics Forum
Computer Graphics Forum 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Graphics Forum is the official journal of Eurographics, published in cooperation with Wiley-Blackwell, and is a unique, international source of information for computer graphics professionals interested in graphics developments worldwide. It is now one of the leading journals for researchers, developers and users of computer graphics in both commercial and academic environments. The journal reports on the latest developments in the field throughout the world and covers all aspects of the theory, practice and application of computer graphics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信