庆祝多元性:如何将包容性研究结构性和有意义地嵌入与深度智力和多重残疾人士相关的研究实践中

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Wietske Verhagen, Annet ten Brug, Aly Waninge, Annette van der Putten
{"title":"庆祝多元性:如何将包容性研究结构性和有意义地嵌入与深度智力和多重残疾人士相关的研究实践中","authors":"Wietske Verhagen,&nbsp;Annet ten Brug,&nbsp;Aly Waninge,&nbsp;Annette van der Putten","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the last decades, developments concerning “inclusive research” gave rise to a growing valuation of and need for the participation of people with experiential expertise in research practices. Knowledge related to inclusive research on people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. The aim of this study is to (1) explore how inclusive research can be structurally and meaningfully embedded in the research practice related to people with PIMD by including the experiential expertise of different stakeholders and (2) start an ongoing dialogue on this topic. Responsive evaluation, a qualitative, participatory research approach, served as the methodological frame for this study. Insight into practical and ethical questions concerning the inclusion of people with experiential expertise in research practices related to people with PIMD was obtained by a brief literature review and exploratory interviews with seven stakeholders. Additionally, six in-depth interviews with various stakeholders explored the possible answers to these questions. Finally, a focus group consisting of seven stakeholders discussed insights that lacked consensus and sparked discussion. The results were arranged in four topics: “what”: defining the used concepts; “why”: the utility and aim of the involvement of stakeholders; “who”: competences needed to participate in research; and “how”: the way participation could be organized within the research practices related to people with PIMD. There is no “one size fits all” solution of embedding inclusive research in research practices related to people with PIMD. In order to be fruitful and meaningful for everyone involved, the context and the various perspectives of all stakeholders within a research project should be taken into account. Making room for plurality, changeability, and an ongoing dialogue between all involved is hereby essential.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Celebrating Plurality: How to Embed Inclusive Research Structurally and Meaningfully in Research Practice Related to People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Wietske Verhagen,&nbsp;Annet ten Brug,&nbsp;Aly Waninge,&nbsp;Annette van der Putten\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jppi.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the last decades, developments concerning “inclusive research” gave rise to a growing valuation of and need for the participation of people with experiential expertise in research practices. Knowledge related to inclusive research on people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. The aim of this study is to (1) explore how inclusive research can be structurally and meaningfully embedded in the research practice related to people with PIMD by including the experiential expertise of different stakeholders and (2) start an ongoing dialogue on this topic. Responsive evaluation, a qualitative, participatory research approach, served as the methodological frame for this study. Insight into practical and ethical questions concerning the inclusion of people with experiential expertise in research practices related to people with PIMD was obtained by a brief literature review and exploratory interviews with seven stakeholders. Additionally, six in-depth interviews with various stakeholders explored the possible answers to these questions. Finally, a focus group consisting of seven stakeholders discussed insights that lacked consensus and sparked discussion. The results were arranged in four topics: “what”: defining the used concepts; “why”: the utility and aim of the involvement of stakeholders; “who”: competences needed to participate in research; and “how”: the way participation could be organized within the research practices related to people with PIMD. There is no “one size fits all” solution of embedding inclusive research in research practices related to people with PIMD. In order to be fruitful and meaningful for everyone involved, the context and the various perspectives of all stakeholders within a research project should be taken into account. Making room for plurality, changeability, and an ongoing dialogue between all involved is hereby essential.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.70018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,关于“包容性研究”的发展使人们越来越重视和需要具有经验专长的人参与研究实践。关于深度智力和多重残疾(PIMD)的包容性研究的相关知识很少。本研究的目的是:(1)探索包容性研究如何通过包括不同利益相关者的经验专长,在与PIMD患者相关的研究实践中进行结构性和有意义地嵌入;(2)就这一主题展开持续的对话。响应性评价是一种定性的、参与性的研究方法,是本研究的方法框架。通过简要的文献回顾和对七个利益相关者的探索性访谈,我们深入了解了有关将具有经验专长的人纳入与PIMD患者相关的研究实践的实践和伦理问题。此外,对不同利益相关者进行了六次深入访谈,探讨了这些问题的可能答案。最后,由七个利益相关者组成的焦点小组讨论了缺乏共识的见解,并引发了讨论。结果分为四个主题:“什么”:定义使用的概念;“为什么”:利益相关者参与的效用和目的;“谁”:参与研究所需的能力;以及“如何”:在与PIMD患者相关的研究实践中组织参与的方式。在与PIMD患者相关的研究实践中嵌入包容性研究并没有“一刀切”的解决方案。为了对每个参与的人都有成果和意义,研究项目中所有利益相关者的背景和各种观点都应该考虑在内。因此,为多样性、可变性和所有相关方之间的持续对话留出空间至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Celebrating Plurality: How to Embed Inclusive Research Structurally and Meaningfully in Research Practice Related to People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities

In the last decades, developments concerning “inclusive research” gave rise to a growing valuation of and need for the participation of people with experiential expertise in research practices. Knowledge related to inclusive research on people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. The aim of this study is to (1) explore how inclusive research can be structurally and meaningfully embedded in the research practice related to people with PIMD by including the experiential expertise of different stakeholders and (2) start an ongoing dialogue on this topic. Responsive evaluation, a qualitative, participatory research approach, served as the methodological frame for this study. Insight into practical and ethical questions concerning the inclusion of people with experiential expertise in research practices related to people with PIMD was obtained by a brief literature review and exploratory interviews with seven stakeholders. Additionally, six in-depth interviews with various stakeholders explored the possible answers to these questions. Finally, a focus group consisting of seven stakeholders discussed insights that lacked consensus and sparked discussion. The results were arranged in four topics: “what”: defining the used concepts; “why”: the utility and aim of the involvement of stakeholders; “who”: competences needed to participate in research; and “how”: the way participation could be organized within the research practices related to people with PIMD. There is no “one size fits all” solution of embedding inclusive research in research practices related to people with PIMD. In order to be fruitful and meaningful for everyone involved, the context and the various perspectives of all stakeholders within a research project should be taken into account. Making room for plurality, changeability, and an ongoing dialogue between all involved is hereby essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信