滑动电弧等离子体先导反应器的性能与集成的碳床和再循环的升级二氧化碳转化†

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Robbe Bryssinck, Gregory James Smith, Colin O'Modhrain, Tom Van Assche, Georgi Trenchev and Annemie Bogaerts
{"title":"滑动电弧等离子体先导反应器的性能与集成的碳床和再循环的升级二氧化碳转化†","authors":"Robbe Bryssinck, Gregory James Smith, Colin O'Modhrain, Tom Van Assche, Georgi Trenchev and Annemie Bogaerts","doi":"10.1039/D5RE00190K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this work, we investigated the performance of a multi-reactor gliding arc plasmatron (MRGAP) pilot reactor with an integrated carbon bed and recirculation. Experimentally, we varied the following parameters: carbon bed position, total flow rate, recirculation and a semi-continuous feeding system. The optimum operating conditions were found to be with the carbon bed located closest to the reactor outlets (35 mm) at a flow rate of 50 L min<small><sup>−1</sup></small> with a semi-continuous carbon feed. Under these conditions, we obtain a maximum CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion of 20%, corresponding to a conversion rate of 1068 g h<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and a CO concentration of 33 vol% at the outlet. The plug-power based energy cost (EC) for these optimum conditions was 5.8 MWh t<small><sub>CO</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small> (1.2 MJ mol<small><sub>CO<small><sub>2</sub></small></sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small>). When implementing a gas recirculation stage, the CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion increases from 10.3% to 12.7%, but the EC rises from 10.9 MWh t<small><sub>CO</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small> to 13.7 MWh t<small><sub>CO</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small>. To complement the experimental work, we also developed a 2D model of the post-plasma chamber, coupled to a simple model for the plasma reactor. The model enables further insights into the effect of the carbon bed position and temperature on the performance, and confirms that when the carbon bed is positioned closer to the inlets, the performance increases. Both experimental and modelling results indicate that the integration of a carbon bed into an industrial scale plasma reactor is viable and can improve both the CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion and energy metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":101,"journal":{"name":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","volume":" 8","pages":" 1910-1923"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of a gliding arc plasmatron pilot reactor with an integrated carbon bed and recirculation for upscaled CO2 conversion†\",\"authors\":\"Robbe Bryssinck, Gregory James Smith, Colin O'Modhrain, Tom Van Assche, Georgi Trenchev and Annemie Bogaerts\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5RE00190K\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In this work, we investigated the performance of a multi-reactor gliding arc plasmatron (MRGAP) pilot reactor with an integrated carbon bed and recirculation. Experimentally, we varied the following parameters: carbon bed position, total flow rate, recirculation and a semi-continuous feeding system. The optimum operating conditions were found to be with the carbon bed located closest to the reactor outlets (35 mm) at a flow rate of 50 L min<small><sup>−1</sup></small> with a semi-continuous carbon feed. Under these conditions, we obtain a maximum CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion of 20%, corresponding to a conversion rate of 1068 g h<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and a CO concentration of 33 vol% at the outlet. The plug-power based energy cost (EC) for these optimum conditions was 5.8 MWh t<small><sub>CO</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small> (1.2 MJ mol<small><sub>CO<small><sub>2</sub></small></sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small>). When implementing a gas recirculation stage, the CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion increases from 10.3% to 12.7%, but the EC rises from 10.9 MWh t<small><sub>CO</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small> to 13.7 MWh t<small><sub>CO</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small>. To complement the experimental work, we also developed a 2D model of the post-plasma chamber, coupled to a simple model for the plasma reactor. The model enables further insights into the effect of the carbon bed position and temperature on the performance, and confirms that when the carbon bed is positioned closer to the inlets, the performance increases. Both experimental and modelling results indicate that the integration of a carbon bed into an industrial scale plasma reactor is viable and can improve both the CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion and energy metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\" 1910-1923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/re/d5re00190k\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/re/d5re00190k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们研究了具有集成碳床和再循环的多反应堆滑动电弧等离子体(MRGAP)中试反应堆的性能。实验中,我们改变了以下参数:碳床位置、总流量、再循环和半连续进料系统。最佳操作条件是碳床位于离反应器出口最近的位置(35 mm),流量为50 L min - 1,半连续进料。在此条件下,我们得到的最大CO2转化率为20%,对应的转化率为1068 g h−1,出口CO浓度为33 vol%。在这些最佳条件下,基于plug-power的能量成本(EC)为5.8 MWh tCO−1 (1.2 MJ molCO2−1)。当实施气体再循环级时,CO2转化率从10.3%增加到12.7%,而EC从10.9 MWh tCO−1增加到13.7 MWh tCO−1。为了补充实验工作,我们还开发了一个后等离子腔的二维模型,并与等离子体反应器的简单模型相结合。该模型可以进一步了解碳床位置和温度对性能的影响,并证实当碳床靠近进口时,性能会提高。实验和模型结果都表明,将碳床集成到工业规模的等离子体反应器中是可行的,并且可以提高CO2转化率和能量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance of a gliding arc plasmatron pilot reactor with an integrated carbon bed and recirculation for upscaled CO2 conversion†

Performance of a gliding arc plasmatron pilot reactor with an integrated carbon bed and recirculation for upscaled CO2 conversion†

In this work, we investigated the performance of a multi-reactor gliding arc plasmatron (MRGAP) pilot reactor with an integrated carbon bed and recirculation. Experimentally, we varied the following parameters: carbon bed position, total flow rate, recirculation and a semi-continuous feeding system. The optimum operating conditions were found to be with the carbon bed located closest to the reactor outlets (35 mm) at a flow rate of 50 L min−1 with a semi-continuous carbon feed. Under these conditions, we obtain a maximum CO2 conversion of 20%, corresponding to a conversion rate of 1068 g h−1 and a CO concentration of 33 vol% at the outlet. The plug-power based energy cost (EC) for these optimum conditions was 5.8 MWh tCO−1 (1.2 MJ molCO2−1). When implementing a gas recirculation stage, the CO2 conversion increases from 10.3% to 12.7%, but the EC rises from 10.9 MWh tCO−1 to 13.7 MWh tCO−1. To complement the experimental work, we also developed a 2D model of the post-plasma chamber, coupled to a simple model for the plasma reactor. The model enables further insights into the effect of the carbon bed position and temperature on the performance, and confirms that when the carbon bed is positioned closer to the inlets, the performance increases. Both experimental and modelling results indicate that the integration of a carbon bed into an industrial scale plasma reactor is viable and can improve both the CO2 conversion and energy metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Chemistry-Chemistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a new journal reporting cutting edge research into all aspects of making molecules for the benefit of fundamental research, applied processes and wider society. From fundamental, molecular-level chemistry to large scale chemical production, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering brings together communities of chemists and chemical engineers working to ensure the crucial role of reaction chemistry in today’s world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信