输血后皮肤血流量的增加与危重病人器官功能的改善有关

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Elaine Cavalcante dos Santos, Péter Bakos, Diego Orbegozo, Hassane Njimi, Zoé Demailly, Jacques Creteur, Jean-Louis Vincent, Fabio Silvio Taccone
{"title":"输血后皮肤血流量的增加与危重病人器官功能的改善有关","authors":"Elaine Cavalcante dos Santos,&nbsp;Péter Bakos,&nbsp;Diego Orbegozo,&nbsp;Hassane Njimi,&nbsp;Zoé Demailly,&nbsp;Jacques Creteur,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Vincent,&nbsp;Fabio Silvio Taccone","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) are administered to critically ill patients to enhance tissue oxygen delivery. We investigated whether an increase in skin blood flow (SBF), a proxy for tissue perfusion, after RBCT was associated with improved organ function in non-bleeding intensive care unit (ICU) patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort included 175 adult ICU patients without acute bleeding who received a RBCT. Finger SBF was measured at basal temperature (SBF<sub>BT</sub>) using skin laser Doppler before and one hour post-RBCT: patients with a ≥ 20 % increase in SBF<sub>BT</sub> were classified as SBF responders. Patients were also classified as having high (&gt;73 PU) or low (≤73 PU) baseline SBF<sub>BT</sub>, based on the optimal pre-transfusion SBF<sub>BT</sub> threshold for predicting SBF response. Patients with a ≥ 1 point reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within 24 h post-RBCT were classified as “SOFA responders”. The primary outcome was the association between SBF responder status and SOFA responder status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 175 patients, 103 (58.9 %) improved SOFA. There was a trend of more SBF responders in the SOFA responders than in the SOFA non-responders group (51/103 [49.5 %] vs. 26/72 [36.1 %]); <em>p</em> = 0.08), respectively. SBF responder status (<em>n</em> = 77, 44 %) independently predicted a decreased SOFA score post-RBCT (OR 2.64, 95 %CI 1.25–5.41, <em>p</em> = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An increase in SBF<sub>BT</sub> after RBCT was independently associated with a reduction of 1 point in SOFA score within 24 h after RBCT. These findings highlight the potential role of RBCT in improving tissue perfusion and organ function in acute illness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 155204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An increase in skin blood flow after red blood cell transfusion is associated with an improvement in organ function in critically ill patients\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Cavalcante dos Santos,&nbsp;Péter Bakos,&nbsp;Diego Orbegozo,&nbsp;Hassane Njimi,&nbsp;Zoé Demailly,&nbsp;Jacques Creteur,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Vincent,&nbsp;Fabio Silvio Taccone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) are administered to critically ill patients to enhance tissue oxygen delivery. We investigated whether an increase in skin blood flow (SBF), a proxy for tissue perfusion, after RBCT was associated with improved organ function in non-bleeding intensive care unit (ICU) patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort included 175 adult ICU patients without acute bleeding who received a RBCT. Finger SBF was measured at basal temperature (SBF<sub>BT</sub>) using skin laser Doppler before and one hour post-RBCT: patients with a ≥ 20 % increase in SBF<sub>BT</sub> were classified as SBF responders. Patients were also classified as having high (&gt;73 PU) or low (≤73 PU) baseline SBF<sub>BT</sub>, based on the optimal pre-transfusion SBF<sub>BT</sub> threshold for predicting SBF response. Patients with a ≥ 1 point reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within 24 h post-RBCT were classified as “SOFA responders”. The primary outcome was the association between SBF responder status and SOFA responder status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 175 patients, 103 (58.9 %) improved SOFA. There was a trend of more SBF responders in the SOFA responders than in the SOFA non-responders group (51/103 [49.5 %] vs. 26/72 [36.1 %]); <em>p</em> = 0.08), respectively. SBF responder status (<em>n</em> = 77, 44 %) independently predicted a decreased SOFA score post-RBCT (OR 2.64, 95 %CI 1.25–5.41, <em>p</em> = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An increase in SBF<sub>BT</sub> after RBCT was independently associated with a reduction of 1 point in SOFA score within 24 h after RBCT. These findings highlight the potential role of RBCT in improving tissue perfusion and organ function in acute illness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 155204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125001911\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125001911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

红细胞输注(RBCTs)用于危重患者以增强组织氧输送。我们研究了非出血重症监护病房(ICU)患者在RBCT后皮肤血流量(SBF)的增加是否与器官功能改善有关,SBF是组织灌注的一个指标。方法对175例接受RBCT检查的无急性出血的成年ICU患者进行前瞻性队列分析。在rbct前和rbct后1小时,使用皮肤激光多普勒测量手指SBF的基础温度(SBFBT): SBFBT升高≥20%的患者被分类为SBF应答者。根据预测SBF反应的最佳输血前SBFBT阈值,将患者分为高(73 PU)或低(≤73 PU)基线SBFBT。rbct后24小时内顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分降低≥1分的患者被归类为SOFA应答者。主要结局是SBF应答者状态和SOFA应答者状态之间的关联。结果175例患者中,SOFA改善103例(58.9%)。SOFA应答组的SBF应答者多于SOFA无应答组(51/103[49.5%]比26/72 [36.1%]);P = 0.08)。SBF反应状态(n = 77, 44%)独立预测rbct后SOFA评分下降(OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.25-5.41, p = 0.01)。结论RBCT后SBFBT升高与术后24 h SOFA评分降低1分独立相关。这些发现强调了RBCT在改善急性疾病组织灌注和器官功能方面的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An increase in skin blood flow after red blood cell transfusion is associated with an improvement in organ function in critically ill patients

Introduction

Red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) are administered to critically ill patients to enhance tissue oxygen delivery. We investigated whether an increase in skin blood flow (SBF), a proxy for tissue perfusion, after RBCT was associated with improved organ function in non-bleeding intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods

This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort included 175 adult ICU patients without acute bleeding who received a RBCT. Finger SBF was measured at basal temperature (SBFBT) using skin laser Doppler before and one hour post-RBCT: patients with a ≥ 20 % increase in SBFBT were classified as SBF responders. Patients were also classified as having high (>73 PU) or low (≤73 PU) baseline SBFBT, based on the optimal pre-transfusion SBFBT threshold for predicting SBF response. Patients with a ≥ 1 point reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within 24 h post-RBCT were classified as “SOFA responders”. The primary outcome was the association between SBF responder status and SOFA responder status.

Results

Of 175 patients, 103 (58.9 %) improved SOFA. There was a trend of more SBF responders in the SOFA responders than in the SOFA non-responders group (51/103 [49.5 %] vs. 26/72 [36.1 %]); p = 0.08), respectively. SBF responder status (n = 77, 44 %) independently predicted a decreased SOFA score post-RBCT (OR 2.64, 95 %CI 1.25–5.41, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

An increase in SBFBT after RBCT was independently associated with a reduction of 1 point in SOFA score within 24 h after RBCT. These findings highlight the potential role of RBCT in improving tissue perfusion and organ function in acute illness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信