{"title":"高能静态超声联合干罐治疗对斜方肌筋膜触发点患者疼痛和功能结局的影响:一项比较研究","authors":"Nassab Toufayli , Hussein Ziab , Behrouz Attarbashi Moghadam , Siamak Bashardoust Tajali","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a widespread musculoskeletal disorder often associated with trapezius myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), resulting to chronic neck pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. While high-power static ultrasound (HPSU) and dry cupping therapy (DC) have shown efficacy as standalone treatments, their combined effects remain unexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the combined effect of HPSU and DC compared to DC alone and standard medical care (SMC) in improving pain, range of motion (ROM), functional capacity, and disability in patients with chronic neck pain due to trapezius MTrPs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-blind randomized clinical trial included 45 patients aged 25–50 years with persistent neck pain (≥3 months) and 5–10 active trapezius MTrPs. Participants were randomized into three groups: (A) HPSU + DC + SMC, (B) DC + SMC, and (C) SMC alone. Interventions consisted of eight sessions over four weeks. Pain (VAS), ROM, functional capacity (Functional Capacity Evaluation), and disability (Neck Disability Index) were assessed at baseline, after the fourth session, and post-intervention. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc tests and effect size interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All groups showed significant improvements in pain, ROM, and disability over time (p < 0.05). DC-based interventions (groups A and B) demonstrated better outcomes compared to SMC alone, particularly in ROM (e.g., η<sup>2</sup> = 0.63 for cervical extension). However, no significant differences has been detected between HPSU + DC and DC-alone groups, indicating that HPSU did not provide additional benefits when combined with DC. Functional capacity improvements were significant in DC-based groups but limited in the SMC group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dry cupping therapy alone improves pain, ROM, functional capacity, and disability in patients with trapezius MTrPs. The addition of HPSU does not enhance therapeutic outcomes, underscoring the sufficiency of DC as a standalone treatment. These findings offer practical guidance for clinicians by emphasizing resource-efficient and accessible interventions for managing chronic neck pain. Future research should optimize cupping parameters and explore the effects of combined modalities in diverse populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 789-796"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of high-power static ultrasound combined with dry cupping therapy on pain and functional outcomes in patients with trapezius myofascial trigger points: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Nassab Toufayli , Hussein Ziab , Behrouz Attarbashi Moghadam , Siamak Bashardoust Tajali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a widespread musculoskeletal disorder often associated with trapezius myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), resulting to chronic neck pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. While high-power static ultrasound (HPSU) and dry cupping therapy (DC) have shown efficacy as standalone treatments, their combined effects remain unexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the combined effect of HPSU and DC compared to DC alone and standard medical care (SMC) in improving pain, range of motion (ROM), functional capacity, and disability in patients with chronic neck pain due to trapezius MTrPs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-blind randomized clinical trial included 45 patients aged 25–50 years with persistent neck pain (≥3 months) and 5–10 active trapezius MTrPs. Participants were randomized into three groups: (A) HPSU + DC + SMC, (B) DC + SMC, and (C) SMC alone. Interventions consisted of eight sessions over four weeks. Pain (VAS), ROM, functional capacity (Functional Capacity Evaluation), and disability (Neck Disability Index) were assessed at baseline, after the fourth session, and post-intervention. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc tests and effect size interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All groups showed significant improvements in pain, ROM, and disability over time (p < 0.05). DC-based interventions (groups A and B) demonstrated better outcomes compared to SMC alone, particularly in ROM (e.g., η<sup>2</sup> = 0.63 for cervical extension). However, no significant differences has been detected between HPSU + DC and DC-alone groups, indicating that HPSU did not provide additional benefits when combined with DC. Functional capacity improvements were significant in DC-based groups but limited in the SMC group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dry cupping therapy alone improves pain, ROM, functional capacity, and disability in patients with trapezius MTrPs. The addition of HPSU does not enhance therapeutic outcomes, underscoring the sufficiency of DC as a standalone treatment. These findings offer practical guidance for clinicians by emphasizing resource-efficient and accessible interventions for managing chronic neck pain. Future research should optimize cupping parameters and explore the effects of combined modalities in diverse populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 789-796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是一种广泛存在的肌肉骨骼疾病,常与斜方肌肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)相关,可导致慢性颈部疼痛、残疾和生活质量下降。虽然高功率静态超声(HPSU)和干拔罐疗法(DC)作为单独治疗已经显示出疗效,但它们的联合效果仍未被探索。目的本研究旨在评价HPSU和DC联合治疗在改善斜方肌MTrPs引起的慢性颈部疼痛患者的疼痛、活动范围、功能能力和残疾方面的效果,并与单独DC和标准医疗护理(SMC)进行比较。方法该单盲随机临床试验纳入45例25-50岁持续性颈部疼痛(≥3个月)和5-10例活动斜方肌MTrPs患者。参与者随机分为三组:(A) HPSU + DC + SMC, (B) DC + SMC和(C)单独SMC。干预措施包括为期四周的八次会议。疼痛(VAS)、ROM、功能能力(功能能力评估)和残疾(颈部残疾指数)分别在基线、第四次治疗后和干预后进行评估。统计分析包括重复测量方差分析、事后检验和效应量解释。结果随着时间的推移,所有组在疼痛、ROM和残疾方面均有显著改善(p <;0.05)。以dc为基础的干预(A组和B组)显示出与单独SMC相比更好的结果,特别是在ROM方面(例如,颈椎伸展的η2 = 0.63)。然而,在HPSU + DC组和单独DC组之间没有发现显着差异,这表明HPSU与DC联合使用时没有提供额外的益处。功能能力的改善在dc基础组是显著的,但在SMC组是有限的。结论单纯干罐治疗可改善斜方肌MTrPs患者的疼痛、活动度、功能能力和残疾。添加HPSU不能提高治疗效果,强调DC作为单独治疗的充分性。这些发现通过强调资源效率和可获得的干预措施来管理慢性颈部疼痛,为临床医生提供了实用的指导。未来的研究应优化拔火罐参数,探索不同人群的联合治疗效果。
Effects of high-power static ultrasound combined with dry cupping therapy on pain and functional outcomes in patients with trapezius myofascial trigger points: A comparative study
Background
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a widespread musculoskeletal disorder often associated with trapezius myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), resulting to chronic neck pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. While high-power static ultrasound (HPSU) and dry cupping therapy (DC) have shown efficacy as standalone treatments, their combined effects remain unexplored.
Objective
This study aims to evaluate the combined effect of HPSU and DC compared to DC alone and standard medical care (SMC) in improving pain, range of motion (ROM), functional capacity, and disability in patients with chronic neck pain due to trapezius MTrPs.
Methods
This single-blind randomized clinical trial included 45 patients aged 25–50 years with persistent neck pain (≥3 months) and 5–10 active trapezius MTrPs. Participants were randomized into three groups: (A) HPSU + DC + SMC, (B) DC + SMC, and (C) SMC alone. Interventions consisted of eight sessions over four weeks. Pain (VAS), ROM, functional capacity (Functional Capacity Evaluation), and disability (Neck Disability Index) were assessed at baseline, after the fourth session, and post-intervention. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc tests and effect size interpretation.
Results
All groups showed significant improvements in pain, ROM, and disability over time (p < 0.05). DC-based interventions (groups A and B) demonstrated better outcomes compared to SMC alone, particularly in ROM (e.g., η2 = 0.63 for cervical extension). However, no significant differences has been detected between HPSU + DC and DC-alone groups, indicating that HPSU did not provide additional benefits when combined with DC. Functional capacity improvements were significant in DC-based groups but limited in the SMC group.
Conclusion
Dry cupping therapy alone improves pain, ROM, functional capacity, and disability in patients with trapezius MTrPs. The addition of HPSU does not enhance therapeutic outcomes, underscoring the sufficiency of DC as a standalone treatment. These findings offer practical guidance for clinicians by emphasizing resource-efficient and accessible interventions for managing chronic neck pain. Future research should optimize cupping parameters and explore the effects of combined modalities in diverse populations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina