Michaela Orlitová , Bert Demeulenaere , Dieter Van Beersel , Dirk E. Van Raemdonck , Robin Vos , Laurens J. Ceulemans , Steffen Rex , Laurent Godinas , Tom Verbelen , Arne P. Neyrinck
{"title":"右心室机械支持作为肺移植的桥梁:当前实践的文献综述","authors":"Michaela Orlitová , Bert Demeulenaere , Dieter Van Beersel , Dirk E. Van Raemdonck , Robin Vos , Laurens J. Ceulemans , Steffen Rex , Laurent Godinas , Tom Verbelen , Arne P. Neyrinck","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) serves as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction/failure (RVD/RVF). Proper assessment and management of RV function in BTT patients are crucial for successful outcomes. However, there is a lack of consensus on standardized RV assessment strategies or optimal ECLS configurations. We aim to synthesize current evidence on RVD/RVF assessment and management in BTT patients requiring ECLS, providing a foundation to aid development of standardized clinical algorithms.</div><div>A scoping literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and grey literature was performed. Inclusion criteria comprised human studies reporting on RV assessment and/or management in BTT patients. Data on patient characteristics, RV assessment methods, and ECLS strategies were extracted. A total of 280 patients were identified. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) was the most common BTT indication (40.4%), followed by RVF (33.2%) and RVD (17.9%). Echocardiography (52.5%) and right heart catheterization (43.2%) were the primary RV assessment tools. However, reporting of specific parameters of RV assessment was inconsistent. Furthermore, we report important variability of practice in ECLS strategies: VV-ECMO (38.8%) was the most common ECLS strategy, followed by VA-ECMO (31.1%), VAV-ECMO (8.2%), and OxyRVAD (13.2%). Based on our findings, bridging strategies currently lack guidance. As BTT is often confronted with dynamic changes over time, respiratory and circulatory ECLS indications may be overlapping. Therefore, a personalized patient approach is needed. We recommend implementing institutional guidelines and international standards to systematically capture this practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right ventricular mechanical support as a bridge to lung transplantation: A literature review of current practices\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Orlitová , Bert Demeulenaere , Dieter Van Beersel , Dirk E. Van Raemdonck , Robin Vos , Laurens J. Ceulemans , Steffen Rex , Laurent Godinas , Tom Verbelen , Arne P. Neyrinck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) serves as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction/failure (RVD/RVF). Proper assessment and management of RV function in BTT patients are crucial for successful outcomes. However, there is a lack of consensus on standardized RV assessment strategies or optimal ECLS configurations. We aim to synthesize current evidence on RVD/RVF assessment and management in BTT patients requiring ECLS, providing a foundation to aid development of standardized clinical algorithms.</div><div>A scoping literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and grey literature was performed. Inclusion criteria comprised human studies reporting on RV assessment and/or management in BTT patients. Data on patient characteristics, RV assessment methods, and ECLS strategies were extracted. A total of 280 patients were identified. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) was the most common BTT indication (40.4%), followed by RVF (33.2%) and RVD (17.9%). Echocardiography (52.5%) and right heart catheterization (43.2%) were the primary RV assessment tools. However, reporting of specific parameters of RV assessment was inconsistent. Furthermore, we report important variability of practice in ECLS strategies: VV-ECMO (38.8%) was the most common ECLS strategy, followed by VA-ECMO (31.1%), VAV-ECMO (8.2%), and OxyRVAD (13.2%). Based on our findings, bridging strategies currently lack guidance. As BTT is often confronted with dynamic changes over time, respiratory and circulatory ECLS indications may be overlapping. Therefore, a personalized patient approach is needed. We recommend implementing institutional guidelines and international standards to systematically capture this practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JHLT Open\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JHLT Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
体外生命支持(ECLS)是急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)或右心室功能障碍/衰竭(RVD/RVF)患者肺移植(BTT)的桥梁。正确评估和管理BTT患者的右心室功能是成功治疗的关键。然而,对于标准化的RV评估策略或最佳ECLS配置缺乏共识。我们的目标是综合目前BTT患者需要ECLS的RVD/RVF评估和管理的证据,为帮助制定标准化的临床算法提供基础。对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和灰色文献进行了范围文献检索。纳入标准包括报告BTT患者RV评估和/或管理的人类研究。提取患者特征、RV评估方法和ECLS策略的数据。总共确定了280例患者。急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)是最常见的BTT适应症(40.4%),其次是裂谷热(33.2%)和RVD(17.9%)。超声心动图(52.5%)和右心导管(43.2%)是主要的RV评估工具。然而,RV评估的具体参数报道不一致。此外,我们报告了ECLS策略实践的重要变异性:VV-ECMO(38.8%)是最常见的ECLS策略,其次是VA-ECMO (31.1%), VAV-ECMO(8.2%)和OxyRVAD(13.2%)。基于我们的发现,桥接策略目前缺乏指导。由于BTT经常面临随时间的动态变化,呼吸和循环ECLS适应症可能重叠。因此,需要个性化的患者方法。我们建议实施机构准则和国际标准,以系统地捕捉这种做法。
Right ventricular mechanical support as a bridge to lung transplantation: A literature review of current practices
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) serves as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction/failure (RVD/RVF). Proper assessment and management of RV function in BTT patients are crucial for successful outcomes. However, there is a lack of consensus on standardized RV assessment strategies or optimal ECLS configurations. We aim to synthesize current evidence on RVD/RVF assessment and management in BTT patients requiring ECLS, providing a foundation to aid development of standardized clinical algorithms.
A scoping literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and grey literature was performed. Inclusion criteria comprised human studies reporting on RV assessment and/or management in BTT patients. Data on patient characteristics, RV assessment methods, and ECLS strategies were extracted. A total of 280 patients were identified. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) was the most common BTT indication (40.4%), followed by RVF (33.2%) and RVD (17.9%). Echocardiography (52.5%) and right heart catheterization (43.2%) were the primary RV assessment tools. However, reporting of specific parameters of RV assessment was inconsistent. Furthermore, we report important variability of practice in ECLS strategies: VV-ECMO (38.8%) was the most common ECLS strategy, followed by VA-ECMO (31.1%), VAV-ECMO (8.2%), and OxyRVAD (13.2%). Based on our findings, bridging strategies currently lack guidance. As BTT is often confronted with dynamic changes over time, respiratory and circulatory ECLS indications may be overlapping. Therefore, a personalized patient approach is needed. We recommend implementing institutional guidelines and international standards to systematically capture this practice.