{"title":"当女性杀人:塞尔维亚女性杀人案件的性别比较分析","authors":"Veljko Turanjanin","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines female-perpetrated homicide in Serbia through a comparative gender lens, based on 172 judicially finalized homicide cases, including a subset involving female offenders. It analyses sociodemographic characteristics, legal processing, and sentencing outcomes for both women and men, with special attention to intimate partner homicides (IPH). Findings show that female perpetrators are typically middle-aged, unemployed, and socioeconomically marginalized, often acting in contexts of prolonged abuse and psychological distress. Their violence tends to be situational and reactive. In contrast, male offenders exhibit broader age ranges, higher recidivism, and coercive motives rooted in jealousy and possessive control. Judicial responses differ markedly by gender. Courts more often cite mitigating factors for women—such as diminished mental capacity, lack of prior convictions, and caregiving roles—while men face harsher assessments based on criminal history and excessive force. These patterns reflect implicit gendered assumptions in judicial reasoning about culpability and risk. By situating these findings within comparative criminology and gender studies, the article contributes to research on lethal violence and calls for context-sensitive legal frameworks. It also underscores the need for harmonized, gender-disaggregated data on femicide and gender-based homicide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 103171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When women kill: A comparative gender analysis of female-perpetrated homicide in Serbia\",\"authors\":\"Veljko Turanjanin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article examines female-perpetrated homicide in Serbia through a comparative gender lens, based on 172 judicially finalized homicide cases, including a subset involving female offenders. It analyses sociodemographic characteristics, legal processing, and sentencing outcomes for both women and men, with special attention to intimate partner homicides (IPH). Findings show that female perpetrators are typically middle-aged, unemployed, and socioeconomically marginalized, often acting in contexts of prolonged abuse and psychological distress. Their violence tends to be situational and reactive. In contrast, male offenders exhibit broader age ranges, higher recidivism, and coercive motives rooted in jealousy and possessive control. Judicial responses differ markedly by gender. Courts more often cite mitigating factors for women—such as diminished mental capacity, lack of prior convictions, and caregiving roles—while men face harsher assessments based on criminal history and excessive force. These patterns reflect implicit gendered assumptions in judicial reasoning about culpability and risk. By situating these findings within comparative criminology and gender studies, the article contributes to research on lethal violence and calls for context-sensitive legal frameworks. It also underscores the need for harmonized, gender-disaggregated data on femicide and gender-based homicide.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525001207\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525001207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
When women kill: A comparative gender analysis of female-perpetrated homicide in Serbia
This article examines female-perpetrated homicide in Serbia through a comparative gender lens, based on 172 judicially finalized homicide cases, including a subset involving female offenders. It analyses sociodemographic characteristics, legal processing, and sentencing outcomes for both women and men, with special attention to intimate partner homicides (IPH). Findings show that female perpetrators are typically middle-aged, unemployed, and socioeconomically marginalized, often acting in contexts of prolonged abuse and psychological distress. Their violence tends to be situational and reactive. In contrast, male offenders exhibit broader age ranges, higher recidivism, and coercive motives rooted in jealousy and possessive control. Judicial responses differ markedly by gender. Courts more often cite mitigating factors for women—such as diminished mental capacity, lack of prior convictions, and caregiving roles—while men face harsher assessments based on criminal history and excessive force. These patterns reflect implicit gendered assumptions in judicial reasoning about culpability and risk. By situating these findings within comparative criminology and gender studies, the article contributes to research on lethal violence and calls for context-sensitive legal frameworks. It also underscores the need for harmonized, gender-disaggregated data on femicide and gender-based homicide.
期刊介绍:
Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.