Giacomo Nebbia, Sourav Kumar, Stephen Michael McNamara, Christopher Bridge, J. Peter Campbell, Michael F. Chiang, Naresh Mandava, Praveer Singh, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
{"title":"根据基础模型提取的影像特征对患者进行再识别","authors":"Giacomo Nebbia, Sourav Kumar, Stephen Michael McNamara, Christopher Bridge, J. Peter Campbell, Michael F. Chiang, Naresh Mandava, Praveer Singh, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01801-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Foundation models for medical imaging are a prominent research topic, but risks associated with the imaging features they can capture have not been explored. We aimed to assess whether imaging features from foundation models enable patient re-identification and to relate re-identification to demographic features prediction. Our data included Colour Fundus Photos (CFP), Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) b-scans, and chest x-rays and we reported re-identification rates of 40.3%, 46.3%, and 25.9%, respectively. We reported varying performance on demographic features prediction depending on re-identification status (e.g., AUC-ROC for gender from CFP is 82.1% for re-identified images vs. 76.8% for non-re-identified ones). When training a deep learning model on the re-identification task, we reported performance of 82.3%, 93.9%, and 63.7% at image level on our internal CFP, OCT, and chest x-ray data. We showed that imaging features extracted from foundation models in ophthalmology and radiology include information that can lead to patient re-identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-identification of patients from imaging features extracted by foundation models\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Nebbia, Sourav Kumar, Stephen Michael McNamara, Christopher Bridge, J. Peter Campbell, Michael F. Chiang, Naresh Mandava, Praveer Singh, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01801-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Foundation models for medical imaging are a prominent research topic, but risks associated with the imaging features they can capture have not been explored. We aimed to assess whether imaging features from foundation models enable patient re-identification and to relate re-identification to demographic features prediction. Our data included Colour Fundus Photos (CFP), Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) b-scans, and chest x-rays and we reported re-identification rates of 40.3%, 46.3%, and 25.9%, respectively. We reported varying performance on demographic features prediction depending on re-identification status (e.g., AUC-ROC for gender from CFP is 82.1% for re-identified images vs. 76.8% for non-re-identified ones). When training a deep learning model on the re-identification task, we reported performance of 82.3%, 93.9%, and 63.7% at image level on our internal CFP, OCT, and chest x-ray data. We showed that imaging features extracted from foundation models in ophthalmology and radiology include information that can lead to patient re-identification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01801-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01801-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Re-identification of patients from imaging features extracted by foundation models
Foundation models for medical imaging are a prominent research topic, but risks associated with the imaging features they can capture have not been explored. We aimed to assess whether imaging features from foundation models enable patient re-identification and to relate re-identification to demographic features prediction. Our data included Colour Fundus Photos (CFP), Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) b-scans, and chest x-rays and we reported re-identification rates of 40.3%, 46.3%, and 25.9%, respectively. We reported varying performance on demographic features prediction depending on re-identification status (e.g., AUC-ROC for gender from CFP is 82.1% for re-identified images vs. 76.8% for non-re-identified ones). When training a deep learning model on the re-identification task, we reported performance of 82.3%, 93.9%, and 63.7% at image level on our internal CFP, OCT, and chest x-ray data. We showed that imaging features extracted from foundation models in ophthalmology and radiology include information that can lead to patient re-identification.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.