在泰国心力衰竭和低钠血症患者的住院治疗中加入托伐普坦:预算影响分析

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-07-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S503735
Unchalee Permsuwan, Krit Leemasawat, Poukwan Arunmanakul
{"title":"在泰国心力衰竭和低钠血症患者的住院治疗中加入托伐普坦:预算影响分析","authors":"Unchalee Permsuwan, Krit Leemasawat, Poukwan Arunmanakul","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S503735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tolvaptan is used as an add-on therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with volume overload, particularly those with hyponatremia (HN), but its cost raises concern. This study aimed to estimate the budget impact of adding 30 mg of tolvaptan to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone in hospitalized HF patients with HN in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A budget impact analysis (BIA) model was developed in accordance with Thai Health Technology Assessment guidelines from the payer's perspective. Epidemiological data on HF in Thailand were used to estimate the target population. Clinical effectiveness data were derived from the EVEREST trial. Cost components included tolvaptan acquisition and HF-related hospitalization costs. Cost data were sourced from the National Health Security Office. The net budget impact (NBI) was calculated as the difference in total budget between standard care with tolvaptan and standard care alone. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of key variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total budget without tolvaptan was 201 million THB (5,802,973 USD), increasing to 221 million THB (6,365,607 USD) with tolvaptan, resulting in an NBI of 19.5 million THB (562,634 USD) or 1117 THB (32 USD) per member. Despite higher drug costs, tolvaptan use reduced hospitalization costs (4.2 million USD vs 5.8 million USD) due to fewer HF hospitalization days and length of stay reduction. A lower tolvaptan dose, reduced HN risk, or a daily cost reduction of at least 25.5% could result in a negative NBI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although tolvaptan reduced hospital length of stay, its use at 30 mg daily still led to a positive NBI. These findings are relevant for Thailand and similar healthcare systems considering tolvaptan adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"485-494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adding Tolvaptan in the Inpatient Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure and Hyponatremia: Budget Impact Analysis in Thailand.\",\"authors\":\"Unchalee Permsuwan, Krit Leemasawat, Poukwan Arunmanakul\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEOR.S503735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tolvaptan is used as an add-on therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with volume overload, particularly those with hyponatremia (HN), but its cost raises concern. This study aimed to estimate the budget impact of adding 30 mg of tolvaptan to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone in hospitalized HF patients with HN in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A budget impact analysis (BIA) model was developed in accordance with Thai Health Technology Assessment guidelines from the payer's perspective. Epidemiological data on HF in Thailand were used to estimate the target population. Clinical effectiveness data were derived from the EVEREST trial. Cost components included tolvaptan acquisition and HF-related hospitalization costs. Cost data were sourced from the National Health Security Office. The net budget impact (NBI) was calculated as the difference in total budget between standard care with tolvaptan and standard care alone. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of key variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total budget without tolvaptan was 201 million THB (5,802,973 USD), increasing to 221 million THB (6,365,607 USD) with tolvaptan, resulting in an NBI of 19.5 million THB (562,634 USD) or 1117 THB (32 USD) per member. Despite higher drug costs, tolvaptan use reduced hospitalization costs (4.2 million USD vs 5.8 million USD) due to fewer HF hospitalization days and length of stay reduction. A lower tolvaptan dose, reduced HN risk, or a daily cost reduction of at least 25.5% could result in a negative NBI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although tolvaptan reduced hospital length of stay, its use at 30 mg daily still led to a positive NBI. These findings are relevant for Thailand and similar healthcare systems considering tolvaptan adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"485-494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S503735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S503735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:托伐普坦被用作容量过载的心力衰竭(HF)患者的附加治疗,特别是低钠血症(HN)患者,但其成本引起了关注。本研究旨在评估泰国住院HF合并HN患者在标准治疗中添加30mg托伐普坦与单独标准治疗的预算影响。方法:根据泰国卫生技术评估指南,从支付方角度建立预算影响分析(BIA)模型。利用泰国心衰的流行病学数据来估计目标人群。临床疗效数据来源于EVEREST试验。费用组成部分包括购买托伐普坦和hf相关住院费用。费用数据来自国家卫生安全办公室。净预算影响(NBI)计算为标准治疗加托伐普坦和单独标准治疗的总预算之差。采用确定性敏感性分析探讨关键变量的影响。结果:不使用托伐普坦的总预算为2.01亿泰铢(5802973美元),使用托伐普坦的总预算增加到2.21亿泰铢(6365607美元),导致NBI为1950万泰铢(562634美元)或每位成员1117泰铢(32美元)。尽管药物成本较高,但使用托伐普坦减少了住院费用(420万美元对580万美元),原因是心衰住院天数减少,住院时间缩短。降低托伐普坦剂量、降低HN风险或每日费用降低至少25.5%可能导致NBI阴性。结论:尽管托伐普坦缩短了住院时间,但每日使用30mg仍可导致NBI阳性。这些发现对泰国和类似的考虑采用托伐普坦的医疗保健系统具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adding Tolvaptan in the Inpatient Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure and Hyponatremia: Budget Impact Analysis in Thailand.

Adding Tolvaptan in the Inpatient Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure and Hyponatremia: Budget Impact Analysis in Thailand.

Adding Tolvaptan in the Inpatient Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure and Hyponatremia: Budget Impact Analysis in Thailand.

Adding Tolvaptan in the Inpatient Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure and Hyponatremia: Budget Impact Analysis in Thailand.

Objective: Tolvaptan is used as an add-on therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with volume overload, particularly those with hyponatremia (HN), but its cost raises concern. This study aimed to estimate the budget impact of adding 30 mg of tolvaptan to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone in hospitalized HF patients with HN in Thailand.

Methods: A budget impact analysis (BIA) model was developed in accordance with Thai Health Technology Assessment guidelines from the payer's perspective. Epidemiological data on HF in Thailand were used to estimate the target population. Clinical effectiveness data were derived from the EVEREST trial. Cost components included tolvaptan acquisition and HF-related hospitalization costs. Cost data were sourced from the National Health Security Office. The net budget impact (NBI) was calculated as the difference in total budget between standard care with tolvaptan and standard care alone. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of key variables.

Results: The total budget without tolvaptan was 201 million THB (5,802,973 USD), increasing to 221 million THB (6,365,607 USD) with tolvaptan, resulting in an NBI of 19.5 million THB (562,634 USD) or 1117 THB (32 USD) per member. Despite higher drug costs, tolvaptan use reduced hospitalization costs (4.2 million USD vs 5.8 million USD) due to fewer HF hospitalization days and length of stay reduction. A lower tolvaptan dose, reduced HN risk, or a daily cost reduction of at least 25.5% could result in a negative NBI.

Conclusion: Although tolvaptan reduced hospital length of stay, its use at 30 mg daily still led to a positive NBI. These findings are relevant for Thailand and similar healthcare systems considering tolvaptan adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信