基于kv锥束CT图像的乳腺癌体积调制电弧治疗剂量计算方案的评价。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amine El Outmani, M Zerfaoui, I Hattal, Y Oulhouq, K Bahhous, A Rrhioua, D Bakari, M Hamal, A Moussa
{"title":"基于kv锥束CT图像的乳腺癌体积调制电弧治疗剂量计算方案的评价。","authors":"Amine El Outmani, M Zerfaoui, I Hattal, Y Oulhouq, K Bahhous, A Rrhioua, D Bakari, M Hamal, A Moussa","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01592-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of treatment centers currently use Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as an effective method of patient repositioning, opening up the prospect of using it in treatment plans calculation. The purpose of this task is to investigate the feasibility of utilizing kV-CBCT images as a potential alternative to CT scans for generating treatment plans during radiation therapy. The images are taken by the imaging system installed on a linear accelerator and implemented in a Treatment Planning System (TPS). This imaging system opens the possibility to proceed to dose calculation using a calibration curve that establishes a link between voxel attenuation in Hounsfield Units (HU) and electron densities relative to water (RED). Furthermore, a comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatment plans on this imaging modality was done to the Computed Tomography (CT) imaging system using the CIRS phantom. The comparison is also performed the images of 10 patients with right breast cancer. VMAT plans from the two modalities were compared in terms of target coverage, normal tissue sparing, dose distribution parameters, and monitor units (MUs). Then, the gamma index test is employed by using the PTW Verisoft to compare the TPS calculated dose distribution for the two modalities. It is also used to compare the measured dose distribution performed by the Portal Dosimetry. Regarding the volume-dose parameters of the PTV and the Organs at risk (OARs), no differences were found between the VMAT plans of the two imaging modalities, CT and CBCT. Additionally, the gamma analysis results of the patients VMAT plans for 1%-1 mm, 2%-2 mm, 3%-3 mm, 4%-4 mm and 5%-5 mm showed that more than 84%, 90%, 92%, 94%, and 96%, respectively, of the points agreed upon between Eclipse calculated and measured dose distributions for the CT and CBCT VMAT plans. The good dosimetric agreement (gamma index reaches more than 92% for 3%-3 mm) between breast VMAT plans based on CT and CBCT images renders the latter an appealing verification tool and a substitute for CT images, if needed, for dose calculation. CBCT images are an effective option for direct dose calculation or to do adaptive radiotherapy in the case of a breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1389-1398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy dose calculation plans based on kV-cone beam CT images for the breast cancer treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Amine El Outmani, M Zerfaoui, I Hattal, Y Oulhouq, K Bahhous, A Rrhioua, D Bakari, M Hamal, A Moussa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-025-01592-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The majority of treatment centers currently use Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as an effective method of patient repositioning, opening up the prospect of using it in treatment plans calculation. The purpose of this task is to investigate the feasibility of utilizing kV-CBCT images as a potential alternative to CT scans for generating treatment plans during radiation therapy. The images are taken by the imaging system installed on a linear accelerator and implemented in a Treatment Planning System (TPS). This imaging system opens the possibility to proceed to dose calculation using a calibration curve that establishes a link between voxel attenuation in Hounsfield Units (HU) and electron densities relative to water (RED). Furthermore, a comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatment plans on this imaging modality was done to the Computed Tomography (CT) imaging system using the CIRS phantom. The comparison is also performed the images of 10 patients with right breast cancer. VMAT plans from the two modalities were compared in terms of target coverage, normal tissue sparing, dose distribution parameters, and monitor units (MUs). Then, the gamma index test is employed by using the PTW Verisoft to compare the TPS calculated dose distribution for the two modalities. It is also used to compare the measured dose distribution performed by the Portal Dosimetry. Regarding the volume-dose parameters of the PTV and the Organs at risk (OARs), no differences were found between the VMAT plans of the two imaging modalities, CT and CBCT. Additionally, the gamma analysis results of the patients VMAT plans for 1%-1 mm, 2%-2 mm, 3%-3 mm, 4%-4 mm and 5%-5 mm showed that more than 84%, 90%, 92%, 94%, and 96%, respectively, of the points agreed upon between Eclipse calculated and measured dose distributions for the CT and CBCT VMAT plans. The good dosimetric agreement (gamma index reaches more than 92% for 3%-3 mm) between breast VMAT plans based on CT and CBCT images renders the latter an appealing verification tool and a substitute for CT images, if needed, for dose calculation. CBCT images are an effective option for direct dose calculation or to do adaptive radiotherapy in the case of a breast cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1389-1398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01592-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01592-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前大多数治疗中心都使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)作为患者重新定位的有效方法,这为其在治疗方案计算中的应用开辟了前景。这项任务的目的是研究利用kV-CBCT图像作为CT扫描的潜在替代方案,在放射治疗期间生成治疗计划的可行性。图像由安装在直线加速器上的成像系统拍摄,并在治疗计划系统(TPS)中实施。该成像系统开启了使用校准曲线进行剂量计算的可能性,该曲线在Hounsfield单位(HU)的体素衰减和相对于水的电子密度(RED)之间建立了联系。此外,在使用CIRS幻影的计算机断层扫描(CT)成像系统上,对这种成像方式的体积调制电弧疗法(VMAT)治疗方案进行了比较。并对10例右侧乳腺癌患者的影像进行了比较。两种模式的VMAT计划在靶覆盖率、正常组织保留、剂量分布参数和监测单位(MUs)方面进行了比较。然后,使用PTW Verisoft进行伽马指数检验,比较两种模式的TPS计算剂量分布。它也用于比较门脉剂量法测定的剂量分布。关于PTV和危险器官(OARs)的体积剂量参数,CT和CBCT两种成像方式的VMAT方案之间没有差异。此外,患者VMAT计划的1%-1 mm、2%-2 mm、3%-3 mm、4%-4 mm和5%-5 mm的伽玛分析结果显示,CT和CBCT VMAT计划的Eclipse计算剂量分布与测量剂量分布之间的一致性分别超过84%、90%、92%、94%和96%。基于CT和CBCT图像的乳腺VMAT方案之间良好的剂量学一致性(在3%- 3mm范围内伽马指数达到92%以上)使后者成为一种有吸引力的验证工具,如果需要,可以替代CT图像进行剂量计算。在乳腺癌病例中,CBCT图像是直接剂量计算或适应性放疗的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy dose calculation plans based on kV-cone beam CT images for the breast cancer treatment.

The majority of treatment centers currently use Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as an effective method of patient repositioning, opening up the prospect of using it in treatment plans calculation. The purpose of this task is to investigate the feasibility of utilizing kV-CBCT images as a potential alternative to CT scans for generating treatment plans during radiation therapy. The images are taken by the imaging system installed on a linear accelerator and implemented in a Treatment Planning System (TPS). This imaging system opens the possibility to proceed to dose calculation using a calibration curve that establishes a link between voxel attenuation in Hounsfield Units (HU) and electron densities relative to water (RED). Furthermore, a comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatment plans on this imaging modality was done to the Computed Tomography (CT) imaging system using the CIRS phantom. The comparison is also performed the images of 10 patients with right breast cancer. VMAT plans from the two modalities were compared in terms of target coverage, normal tissue sparing, dose distribution parameters, and monitor units (MUs). Then, the gamma index test is employed by using the PTW Verisoft to compare the TPS calculated dose distribution for the two modalities. It is also used to compare the measured dose distribution performed by the Portal Dosimetry. Regarding the volume-dose parameters of the PTV and the Organs at risk (OARs), no differences were found between the VMAT plans of the two imaging modalities, CT and CBCT. Additionally, the gamma analysis results of the patients VMAT plans for 1%-1 mm, 2%-2 mm, 3%-3 mm, 4%-4 mm and 5%-5 mm showed that more than 84%, 90%, 92%, 94%, and 96%, respectively, of the points agreed upon between Eclipse calculated and measured dose distributions for the CT and CBCT VMAT plans. The good dosimetric agreement (gamma index reaches more than 92% for 3%-3 mm) between breast VMAT plans based on CT and CBCT images renders the latter an appealing verification tool and a substitute for CT images, if needed, for dose calculation. CBCT images are an effective option for direct dose calculation or to do adaptive radiotherapy in the case of a breast cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信