Katelyn E Rudisill, Meera M Dhodapkar, Philip P Ratnasamy, Seongho Jeong, Jonathan N Grauer
{"title":"在过去的十年里,在急诊科就诊的患者中,相对于局部脊柱MRI,全脊柱MRI的应用越来越多。","authors":"Katelyn E Rudisill, Meera M Dhodapkar, Philip P Ratnasamy, Seongho Jeong, Jonathan N Grauer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spine MRI is increasingly considered for patients presenting through the emergency department (ED). It was hypothesized that more MRIs are being obtained of the entire spine (relative to localized regions) over time, and there are inconsistencies in this practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were abstracted from the 2010 to 2021 M151Ortho PearlDiver national, multi-insurance, administrative data set. Patients who received spine MRI within 7 days of presenting through the ED were categorized as having had localized MRI (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, cervical and thoracic, or thoracic and lumbar) or total spine (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar). Patient characteristics were compared between these categories with multivariable analyses. Furthermore, the rate of follow-up MRI within 14 days of initial MRI was assessed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 275,999 patients identified as undergoing spine MRI, 93.25% were localized MRI and 6.75% were total spine MRI. Over a decade, total spine MRIs increased from 4.85% in 2010 to 12.38% in 2021 (P < 0.0001). Independent predictive factors for receiving a total spine MRI included indication (trauma, infection, neoplasm with odds ratio [OR], 1.30 relative to degenerative), patient factors (younger age [OR, 1.47 per decade], male sex [OR, 1.21], higher comorbidity [OR, 1.38]), and nonclinical factors (region of the country West [OR, 1.32 relative to South] and insurance plan (Medicaid OR, 1.23 and Medicare OR, 1.10 relative to commercial; P < 0.0001 for each except 0.0005 for Medicare). Follow-up MRIs within 14 days were more likely for total spine MRI than for the localized MRI group (7.28% vs. 5.26%, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>For patients presenting through the ED, total spine MRIs represent a small but growing minority of spine MRI scans obtained. The nonclinical factors associated with this decision and mildly increased need for follow-up scans after total relative to localized MRI suggest room for greater consistency of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growing Utilization of Total Spine MRI Relative to Localized Spine MRI for Patients Presenting Through Emergency Departments Over the Past Decade.\",\"authors\":\"Katelyn E Rudisill, Meera M Dhodapkar, Philip P Ratnasamy, Seongho Jeong, Jonathan N Grauer\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spine MRI is increasingly considered for patients presenting through the emergency department (ED). It was hypothesized that more MRIs are being obtained of the entire spine (relative to localized regions) over time, and there are inconsistencies in this practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were abstracted from the 2010 to 2021 M151Ortho PearlDiver national, multi-insurance, administrative data set. Patients who received spine MRI within 7 days of presenting through the ED were categorized as having had localized MRI (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, cervical and thoracic, or thoracic and lumbar) or total spine (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar). Patient characteristics were compared between these categories with multivariable analyses. Furthermore, the rate of follow-up MRI within 14 days of initial MRI was assessed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 275,999 patients identified as undergoing spine MRI, 93.25% were localized MRI and 6.75% were total spine MRI. Over a decade, total spine MRIs increased from 4.85% in 2010 to 12.38% in 2021 (P < 0.0001). Independent predictive factors for receiving a total spine MRI included indication (trauma, infection, neoplasm with odds ratio [OR], 1.30 relative to degenerative), patient factors (younger age [OR, 1.47 per decade], male sex [OR, 1.21], higher comorbidity [OR, 1.38]), and nonclinical factors (region of the country West [OR, 1.32 relative to South] and insurance plan (Medicaid OR, 1.23 and Medicare OR, 1.10 relative to commercial; P < 0.0001 for each except 0.0005 for Medicare). Follow-up MRIs within 14 days were more likely for total spine MRI than for the localized MRI group (7.28% vs. 5.26%, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>For patients presenting through the ED, total spine MRIs represent a small but growing minority of spine MRI scans obtained. The nonclinical factors associated with this decision and mildly increased need for follow-up scans after total relative to localized MRI suggest room for greater consistency of practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:脊柱MRI越来越多地被认为是通过急诊科(ED)就诊的患者。据推测,随着时间的推移,整个脊柱(相对于局部区域)的mri越来越多,但这种做法存在不一致之处。方法:数据提取自2010 - 2021年M151Ortho PearlDiver全国、多保险、行政数据集。通过急诊就诊后7天内接受脊柱MRI检查的患者被分类为局部MRI检查(颈椎、胸椎、腰椎、颈椎和胸椎或胸椎和腰椎)或全脊柱(颈椎、胸椎和腰椎)。用多变量分析比较这些类别的患者特征。此外,评估和比较首次MRI后14天内的随访MRI率。结果:275,999例脊柱MRI患者中,93.25%为局部MRI, 6.75%为全脊柱MRI。十年来,脊柱总mri从2010年的4.85%上升到2021年的12.38% (P < 0.0001)。接受全脊柱MRI检查的独立预测因素包括适应症(创伤、感染、肿瘤,优势比[OR],相对于退行性疾病为1.30)、患者因素(年龄较小[OR,每十年1.47]、男性[OR, 1.21]、较高的合并症[OR, 1.38])和非临床因素(西部地区[OR,相对于南部1.32]和保险计划(医疗补助OR, 1.23和医疗保险OR,相对于商业OR 1.10;除医疗保险P < 0.0005外,其他均< 0.0001)。14天内随访MRI的可能性,全脊柱MRI组高于局部MRI组(7.28% vs. 5.26%, P < 0.0001)。讨论:对于通过急诊科就诊的患者,全脊柱MRI只占脊柱MRI扫描的一小部分,但在不断增长。与这一决定相关的非临床因素,以及相对于局部MRI,全面随访扫描的需求略有增加,表明有更大的一致性实践空间。
Growing Utilization of Total Spine MRI Relative to Localized Spine MRI for Patients Presenting Through Emergency Departments Over the Past Decade.
Background: Spine MRI is increasingly considered for patients presenting through the emergency department (ED). It was hypothesized that more MRIs are being obtained of the entire spine (relative to localized regions) over time, and there are inconsistencies in this practice.
Methods: Data were abstracted from the 2010 to 2021 M151Ortho PearlDiver national, multi-insurance, administrative data set. Patients who received spine MRI within 7 days of presenting through the ED were categorized as having had localized MRI (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, cervical and thoracic, or thoracic and lumbar) or total spine (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar). Patient characteristics were compared between these categories with multivariable analyses. Furthermore, the rate of follow-up MRI within 14 days of initial MRI was assessed and compared.
Results: Of the 275,999 patients identified as undergoing spine MRI, 93.25% were localized MRI and 6.75% were total spine MRI. Over a decade, total spine MRIs increased from 4.85% in 2010 to 12.38% in 2021 (P < 0.0001). Independent predictive factors for receiving a total spine MRI included indication (trauma, infection, neoplasm with odds ratio [OR], 1.30 relative to degenerative), patient factors (younger age [OR, 1.47 per decade], male sex [OR, 1.21], higher comorbidity [OR, 1.38]), and nonclinical factors (region of the country West [OR, 1.32 relative to South] and insurance plan (Medicaid OR, 1.23 and Medicare OR, 1.10 relative to commercial; P < 0.0001 for each except 0.0005 for Medicare). Follow-up MRIs within 14 days were more likely for total spine MRI than for the localized MRI group (7.28% vs. 5.26%, P < 0.0001).
Discussion: For patients presenting through the ED, total spine MRIs represent a small but growing minority of spine MRI scans obtained. The nonclinical factors associated with this decision and mildly increased need for follow-up scans after total relative to localized MRI suggest room for greater consistency of practice.